Technical advice for getting Bilsteins revalved

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hopeful
    replied
    Originally posted by JGood
    I was finally able to reach Koni.

    325iX Koni Sport, part # 8641-1144Sport
    500/650 comp/reb, Newtons @ 75mm/sec

    325i Koni Sport, part # 8641-1021Sport
    500/850 comp/reb, Newtons @ 75mm/sec

    So identical compression, softer rebound. Rebound is adjustable on these though, so I'm not sure if that would even matter. I'm sure you can get all the rebound you need if you max it out.

    I didn't bother asking about the Corrado Koni valving, because I can't think of any reason to use them instead of the iX Koni's.
    a BIG THANK YOU coming to you from 2024. I cannot beleive how difficult it is to find the information for shorter shocks for a platform as whored out as the e30.

    Leave a comment:


  • ngampleh
    replied
    what IX koni part number that you bought?
    is it 325iX Koni Sport, part # 8641-1144Sport
    where you bought + how much?

    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • JGood
    replied
    Also, I've had shocks bottom out before. When I was running Bilstein sports with H&R Sports and 15mm drop hats, it would bottom out. Switching to H&R Races actually made for a smoother ride.

    But what I was experiencing was bouncing, the car felt like it would just jump off the road if I hit a bump while cornering hard. It could be the bump stops, but it felt more like the coils just bouncing. I guess it's a little late to know for sure, I sold the Bilsteins already.

    Leave a comment:


  • JGood
    replied
    Nope, didn't cut the bump stops down. My car is different, so measuremenys won't help. I have ~1" spacers between the front subframe and the body, effectively raising the body in relation to the suspension.

    When I had the car about 3/4" higher, it felt about the same. I understand a full plot would tell the story better then a single reference point, but I'm guessing since that single point on the iX Bilsteins is about 1/2 the comp/reb as a normal Bilstein Sport, they are probably much softer overall.

    Leave a comment:


  • dsm2002
    replied
    'xactly. in my example a mere 15mm was the difference between horrible and mostly comfortable.

    Leave a comment:


  • nrubenstein
    replied
    You can, of course, cut down the bump stop in the iX Bilsteins. The difference is night and day in terms of ride quality.

    Edit: The thing to remember about that photo comparison is that the Bilstein has the bump stop installed (which is 3-4" long), while the Koni is bottoming out. The Koni has much less travel available in real life usage, while the Bilstein has significantly more potential. Cut an inch off the internal bump stop of the Bilstein and add a bump stop on to the Koni and you are even.
    Last edited by nrubenstein; 06-08-2013, 08:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dsm2002
    replied
    Originally posted by JGood
    Got the Koni 325iX shocks installed. What a difference! The car feels so much better. Way smoother ride, I'm guessing the softer Bilstein iX's were bottoming out on every bump, and the lack of rebound means it was bouncing around a lot too, which is now gone. With the Koni's, the car feels like it did before I shortened the struts, when I was just running 450 lb springs and stock-length Bilstein Sports. Very streetable and planted in corners over bumps.

    Here's some pics. In addition to the more appropriate valving, I also gained about 2-3" of suspension travel, and lost about 2" of unneeded droop. These are really the way to go with shortened struts, IMO.
    I like how you are chasing hard figures. Excellent! One issue is that figures at 52mm or 70mm is just a small part of the picture. The figures are just a couple of points on a plot and the shape of the plot lines is the critical issue.

    I'm wondering if the suspension simply hits the bump stops often. A few using the iXs have cut their bumps stops down. Did you cut yours?

    I had a similar occurrence, i.e. crashing on the bump stops, with an E30 with softer front springs and Bilstein HDs. I found that raising the suspension 15mm almost eliminated completely the harshness on the bump stops on hard bumps. The extra travel made the difference, something you have gained with the Konis.

    As a matter of interest, do you have ride height figures (preferably centre of wheel to fender lip vertically above) for the current setup?

    Originally posted by JGood

    Fully compressed. Probably 2-3" difference.

    This is the telling shot. As you say, extra suspension travel.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    sweet, glad that worked out for you!

    the more people that buy ix parts the better - it means the supply won't disappear because of lack of interest. :p

    Leave a comment:


  • JGood
    replied
    Got the Koni 325iX shocks installed. What a difference! The car feels so much better. Way smoother ride, I'm guessing the softer Bilstein iX's were bottoming out on every bump, and the lack of rebound means it was bouncing around a lot too, which is now gone. With the Koni's, the car feels like it did before I shortened the struts, when I was just running 450 lb springs and stock-length Bilstein Sports. Very streetable and planted in corners over bumps.

    Here's some pics. In addition to the more appropriate valving, I also gained about 2-3" of suspension travel, and lost about 2" of unneeded droop. These are really the way to go with shortened struts, IMO.


    Koni 325iX on top, Bilstein 325iX on bottom







    Fully compressed. Probably 2-3" difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • einstein57
    replied
    After talking to one of the bilstein techs for about a half hour we came up with a street/auto-x valving for my ix inserts. Unfortunately they have been sitting in the box for about a year now. I will be installing them this summer finally. When i spoke to the Koni reps about re-valving a set of ix inserts they said it would be $120 each plus parts. I would recommend purchasing the Konis from GC over re valving a set.

    Leave a comment:


  • JGood
    replied
    I was finally able to reach Koni.

    325iX Koni Sport, part # 8641-1144Sport
    500/650 comp/reb, Newtons @ 75mm/sec

    325i Koni Sport, part # 8641-1021Sport
    500/850 comp/reb, Newtons @ 75mm/sec

    So identical compression, softer rebound. Rebound is adjustable on these though, so I'm not sure if that would even matter. I'm sure you can get all the rebound you need if you max it out.

    I didn't bother asking about the Corrado Koni valving, because I can't think of any reason to use them instead of the iX Koni's.

    Leave a comment:


  • JGood
    replied
    Just got off the phone with Bilstein.

    325iX HD, part # 34-002513
    136/47 comp/reb

    325i Sport, part # 34-003350
    223/75 comp/reb

    He didn't want to give those numbers out, apparently they aren't supposed to, so I didn't bother prying into what the units / scale of the numbers are. But he did say that the iX HD's were considerably softer then the normal Sports, which confirms the info I posted earlier and what they feel like by hand.

    (EDIT: Those numbers are the same as the ones I posted earlier, just divided by ten... weird)


    I'm now on the hunt for Koni numbers. I want a confirmation that the iX Koni's will be valved about the same as the RWD e30 Koni's, in which case they are the obvious choice for a drop-in solution with shortened housings, and not having to deal with changing camber plate bearings, etc... like with the Corrado shocks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    I am running G60 Yellows at the moment and they seem to handle my 450# ERS okay, though the compression damping feels a bit soft. I have the rebound cranked to 2/2.5 turns to handle the stiff(ish) springs. The G60 inserts are very short--like 4" shorter than stock inserts--and do not have the same amount of stroke. You are going to need a spacer to put underneath them if you want to run them. My housings are shortened by 1-2" and I have spacers under the inserts. I do not have much droop travel, it's very evident when the car is on a lift. But if you don't have helper springs that can be a good thing.

    OTS Yellows will "work fine" for damping a 450# spring, but you may run into some headaches when implementing a frankensteined suspension together. For instance, I found out that when running 225/50r15 R888s, my tires hit the frame seam at the top of the wheel well before the bump stops bottom out. Ah, fun times. :p

    Leave a comment:


  • DRTSRFR
    replied
    OY...you guys read too much...;)

    The 1198sport does have more droop. The shaft of the the 1198 SPGC was exactly the same, it just had droop limiters added.

    The only thing 1198sports and 1198SPGC had in common was the body of the damper and the shaft itself. Sports are made in Kentucky, SPGCs are made in Holland.

    The 1198SPGCs were discontinued, and the 1547SPGC was introduced with some refinements, to eliminate confusion between the two.
    Last edited by DRTSRFR; 05-29-2013, 01:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    dunno. maybe it's cheaper and the Corrado inserts can handle higher rates. I ran mine with 600# springs for a long time though, 450# should be no sweat.

    you have to shorten the housings of course but I think that is the point.

    dimensionally they are the same other than length, no issues with different gland nut sizes etc. I ended up with some VW konis for a while and I had to change my strut bearings for camber plates because the VW inserts used 21mm nuts instead of 19mm and my socket wouldn't fit. I had to add spacers as they weren't the right diameter or length.

    Leave a comment:

Working...