Ground Control RSM vs. IE Billet RSM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hellabad
    replied
    Originally posted by submwar
    GROUND CONTROL RSM vs IE BILLET RSM


    How do these two COMPARE?
    Compare.

    To answer the original question:

    There are several differences, the most important I think is that the Ground Control RSM is made for an e30, and the IE seems to be "universal". The GC reinforcement bracket is for an e30, but the IE looks like it is for an e36. I can only guess, but it looks like an e36 part sold for an e30.

    Somebody mentioned TCK, but that is also universal, and has no reinforcement at all. Plus the bolts need access from the trunk, which nobody else requires anymore. As far as rubber vs urethane goes, any RSM is a good application for urethane. There is no twisting or rotation involved on an RSM, so the squeaking that comes from most urethane suspension bushings won't happen with any urethane RSM.

    Monoball rear shock mounts are just silly for anything that is not a full blown race car, and even then you need some expensive shocks to have difference, let alone feel the difference. Monoball RSM will --always-- make tons of noise.

    I have measured the deflection of a GC RSM on the dyno vs a monoball vs a rubber one, and the deflection is:

    Monoball: 0.0

    GC.0.007

    rubber (buna!) 0.120



    Ground Control for an e30



    Ireland Engineering


    Tc Kline
    Last edited by Hellabad; 08-22-2008, 02:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DSP74
    replied
    The TCK option has rubber bushings which is a plus IMO.

    In this instance rubber or spherical bearings are the best choices

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    neither

    TCK :p

    Leave a comment:


  • submwar
    started a topic Ground Control RSM vs. IE Billet RSM

    Ground Control RSM vs. IE Billet RSM

    GROUND CONTROL RSM vs IE BILLET RSM


    How do these two COMPARE?
Working...