If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Except Hankooks generally suck... In my experience at least. I had them on my 6 series and on my Alfa, I'd go with them only if Kumho were the only other choice.
Sounds to me like you haven’t driven on Hankook RS2 Z212s.
id still really like to see a 245 on the rear. that shit would look badass... anyone know of any pics floating around with it? i think alex runs that, but he has super pulled fenders. i think i will sort of give appearance a bit more favor over driveability, just a little.
Except Hankooks generally suck... In my experience at least. I had them on my 6 series and on my Alfa, I'd go with them only if Kumho were the only other choice.
I looked at the specs for the RT-615 and the 215/45/16 has almost a full inch more tread width than my Yokohama AVS ES100 225/50/16s. Needless to say, I will be getting RT-615s in that size when my Rotas arrive.
Also, in regards to replacing tire every 3 months, it's not likely... Even if you drive it daily. My ES100s have a 12 to 15,000 mile life expectancy with a tread wear of 280. I have had them on the car for over 11,000 miles now and I have still have about 70% tread left, so it really does depend on how you drive. The RT-615's tread wear is 200, so even for a daily driver, if you didn't abuse the tires, you probably would only replace them once a year.
I'm not saying I recommend buying the stickiest tire with a 200 tread wear rating for a daily driver, but for a car that is occasionally driven on the street and mostly used for "pleasure" driving, I'd get something a bit more radical than an all season Dunlop piece of shit with a tread wear rating of 400...
Still, for a street car, I'd lean towards a wider tire with more life expectancy anyhow.
Leave a comment: