Slammin's Range Rover (Pg 9)
Collapse
X
-
-
Why though? I am ~le confused.
BMW 6'ers arent the....torqueiest bunch of motors.....esp the 2.5/2.8
Though paired behind the proper trans and diff does matter I assume.Originally posted by TSI♫ Rust flecks are falling on my head...♫OEM+Comment
-
Lawl! We'll see. That's be badass. I was thinking there may, may be a way to slap my M60 in2derrr.1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5Comment
-
^^ That's a 2002+ though, isn't it?1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5Comment
-
Comment
-
Apparently 3rd Gen RRs are BMW e38/39s inside.
In 2002, the third-generation model was introduced which saw the model move further up-market. Planned and developed under BMW ownership the third generation was to share components and systems (electronics, core power units etc.) with the E38 7 Series. It was designed to accommodate BMW's M62 V8 engines for future models. The manual transmission was dropped entirely, leaving only the automatic transmission. The E38 7 Series electronics system were being phased out during the development of the third-generation Range Rover and being replaced with the electronics from the BMW E39 5 Series. The entertainment system (Radio Function, Navigation System, Television and Telecommunications systems, as well as the automotive computer bus system[9]) are identical with the BMW E39 5 Series. The third-generation model Range Rover can be upgraded with the newest BMW technologies.[10]1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5Comment
-
1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5Comment
-
-
Went and had a look at it. It's crazy rugged looking. Can't wait to get it. My friend wasn't home so I just gave it a good once over. Hopefully I'll see 'er run tomorrow.1974.5 Jensen Healey : 2003 330i/5Comment
-
I don't know if it will help but this is how my moms car looked at 240k
88 325is Five SpeedLachssilberComment



Comment