E30 e36 e46 M3 Shirt Designs, thoughts?

[agent]

How about you sit in timeout for the weekend and come back if/when you can have a discussion without resorting to name calling.

[LJ851]

OP ask asks for thoughts on "his" design.

Doesn't like r3v's thoughts, gets panties bunched.

lol

[ST1G]

How about you sit in timeout for the weekend and come back if/when you can have a discussion without resorting to name calling.

It looks like the Supreme Court has spoken

[slammin.e28]

It looks like the Supreme Court has spoken

Sacked!

[BobombETA]

Well this made for a nice little Friday at work.... I f5'd it a few times :)

[DEV0 E30]

1. Running a photoshop filter "artistic cutout" to give the photo a vectorized look looks terrible and doesn't mean these photos are suddenly a design. If you aren't going to put in the minimum effort to actually vectorize, you can't argue you've done shit to change the photo. You've barely distorted them. Sure, they'll likely be a little more distorted since I bet you don't have high enough resolution "designs" to actually print well on a shirt, but that doesn't even matter.

2. They aren't your photos, therefore I'd help alert the proper owners long before you were to sell the shirts. Where did you find the E46 by the way? I recognize all of the cars, but that one in particular reminds me of a recent photo.

3. You're attitude shows you aren't out to help the community and offer anything unique, you're looking for a few quick bucks. Plus, your "design" isn't even original, the free market shows much better options for something similar. But you won't get that far.

The only thing tying this images to the originals are the plates. If the artwork gets reEdited and the plates removed I'm free to do as I please because the piece can no longer be pinpointed to one original source. Simple as that.

Nope. I can still clearly tell you're stealing someone else's work, and doing very little to change it. If you get written, signed permission from the original owners then you can move forward if not, I'll gladly help the original owners write up a cease and desist order. You can't try to make profit from something you steal without consequences.

[QUKBMER]

The suspence was killing me to find out what was going to happen. lol

[ST1G]

The suspence was killing me to find out what was going to happen. lol

[QUKBMER]

I know.

[markseven]

"Photo copying text books to sell to students"

Sounds like what I'm doing...

"Oh what are you criticizing or commenting on?"

It clearly says on the title "thoughts?" Meaning, what are your comments or criticism about the design itself.

"Fair use doctrine does not apply of you are tying to make profit"

"Seems to me you're just trying to make money"

First, stop assuming. Two, Don't see a link to a selling thread of any kind.

Unethical behavior is not illegal.


Moral of the story is quoting irrelevant cases that have nothing to do with what I did is just ignorant plus I haven't broken the law yet.

It's like a rapper making a song with a sample and showing people and the people bitching about the song having a sample before he even tries to do anything with the song.



"When somebody talks in circles and you follow the words, it is you who gets dizzy."

With that said I'm done talking to your ignorant (by every sense of the word) ass.

P.S.

I'm a graphic design mayor and took full semester classes on copyright and law alone.

At least one of us wasn't talking out of his ass.

I wouldn't buy a shirt based on this obnoxious post alone.