i sorta like it. i think the E39 M5 is to bland looking.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mwerks breaking coverage on new M5
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by RobI thought they were talking about the weight differences between the E39 M5 and the new one.
either way i think its fucking ugly, I dont care how fast it is
Comment
-
Originally posted by CiLK WuRMYea, but since when has a truck load of power meant a good car?
Hell, CAR magazine in the UK rated the E39 M5 above the latest E55 AMG.
Comment
-
The E55 is rated at 470bhp though. Its also put through a torque converter.
It's also over 2 tonne (4087lbs)
I think the M5 (which should weigh under 3800lbs) will make similar horsepower (though not as much torque) and put it down better with a proper clutch (no pedal, but alot less driveline loss than a torque converter)
Now... if they make a V12 or V12 Twin Turbo E-series... its all over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChapelThe E55 is rated at 470bhp though. Its also put through a torque converter.
It's also over 2 tonne (4087lbs)
I think the M5 (which should weigh under 3800lbs) will make similar horsepower (though not as much torque) and put it down better with a proper clutch (no pedal, but alot less driveline loss than a torque converter)
Now... if they make a V12 or V12 Twin Turbo E-series... its all over.
under rated? ;)
Comment
-
I think we just need to wait and see when the M5 comes out and is compared to every other previous automobile ever made,
Even if the M5 is slower, it will handle better, and be better,,
for $15k more you can put a twin turbo system on the M5, nothing will be in front then
nothingGunni
@ Prodrive / Aston Martin Racing
Comment
Comment