Can you provide proof that Luke told you to chuck the box and that he'd send you another? What about when he told you to send it back on your dime? As it is, it's your word against his. Pics of the box will also help.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Has anybody been in contact with Luke (stereoinstaller1) recentley?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by rturbo 930 View PostCan you provide proof that Luke told you to chuck the box and that he'd send you another? What about when he told you to send it back on your dime? As it is, it's your word against his. Pics of the box will also help.
If you have that correspondence, then send that to Paypal, they should agree to the refund without returning.
Second I am not saying your son is off his rocker, but that is a bit nuts of destroying his own brand new amp, it would have made more sense if he destroyed the Luke box out of anger.
Third and while I still dont think you should pay for the return you can ship that thing back for less then $100. I have shipped Diff's that are way heavier for $80. I have also shipped entire sets of seats across the country for $125, if you have to send it back go to a different carrier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Staszek View PostSecond I am not saying your son is off his rocker, but that is a bit nuts of destroying his own brand new amp, it would have made more sense if he destroyed the Luke box out of anger.
Comment
-
I'm not the first Luke has done this to and I'm not the last. My son's anger issues are tied to losing his father, mostly. His father was helping him design this sound system when he abruptly passed, so this is a sore issue.
We only have Luke's verbal on 'pitching' the box. We do have written texts from Luke proving he accepted responsibility for sending the incorrect box. To charge a customer for such return at such expense is wrong.
So my question, before I sound too crazy, is this: would any of you pay $100+ dollars to box/ship an item back that was incorrectly sent to you? Why would you?
I'm not the first by far, nor am I going to be the last who gets the big ol' shaft from Luke. I counted 8 such threads on other boards. Perhaps we're all off our rockers.
Comment
-
Honestly if I had to spend $125 to get $375 back, I would still end up with $250 back in my pocket.
Not excusing what happened, as I agree return shipping should be covered.
But you had an option to get a chunk of your money back. Really, it was your only option without evidence of being told to toss the box. Now it looks like you are out of luck and just looking to share your story. You've done that.No E30 ClubOriginally posted by MrBurgundyAnyways, mustangs are gay and mini vans are faster than your car, you just have to deal with that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TimeMachinE30 View PostSon sounds like a snowflake. All these excuses for bad, childish, immature behavior. Wait until he experiences life, without mommy... he sounds like a ticking time bomb.
That is all.
If this was a normal occurrence before then I would say that's an issue, but this projected seems like a very father son thing so I can only imagine how many memories and emotions it would bring up.
We probably should just leave that part out of it and stick with the return facts.
As for the question if I would pay $100 to get $250 back, probably, but I would not think its right when its the company's fault.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Staszek View PostI am not going to excuse his actions, but I will say losing ones father at that age really does mess with you. My cousin lost his father at 16 and he was really bad for a while, a lot of acting out, his father was like a second father to me and the only thing that kept me in line is I was a bit older and more mature at the time.
If this was a normal occurrence before then I would say that's an issue, but this projected seems like a very father son thing so I can only imagine how many memories and emotions it would bring up.
We probably should just leave that part out of it and stick with the return facts.
As for the question if I would pay $100 to get $250 back, probably, but I would not think its right when its the company's fault.
Comment
-
if she were to sue him for the $100 in shipping, in a court of law they may take her sending the box back as acknowledging a "wrong doing" on her part, or a passive addmission of guilt. And lets just stop slinging shit and stick to the facts. it does nothing for those involved. Those involved should stop as well, the idea is to see evidence in support of claims and get to a resolution.
Comment
Comment