Franken Kar

[JGood]

Then why are you claiming without any evidence of ANY kind but a picture of what could be anybodys engine and your word?

And for you owning one of these 11k engines and not have a race team you own, sounds even more implossible.

also a 7mm valve stem is a production sized valve stem for a euro S50.
S50B32 and S54B32 use a 6mm valve stem for a good reason,
a 11k S42, S20 would never use a 7mm valve stem.

You can´t forget that the internet isn´t on the internet anymore,.
What you say HERE get´s out THERE.

I´m not even going to touch your "engineered" rear braces.

Euro-ownage


Nice my friend, very nice :pimp:

[TwoJ's]

SAE HP is:
Torque times RPM divided by 5252 always

Exactly. So at 5252 rpm, HP = torque * (5252/5252).


So what exactly do you mean? Still a bull shit .graph

[DCColegrove]

Then why are you claiming without any evidence of ANY kind but a picture of what could be anybodys engine and your word?

And for you owning one of these 11k engines and not have a race team you own, sounds even more implossible.

also a 7mm valve stem is a production sized valve stem for a euro S50.
S50B32 and S54B32 use a 6mm valve stem for a good reason,
a 11k S42, S20 would never use a 7mm valve stem.

You can´t forget that the internet isn´t on the internet anymore,.
What you say HERE get´s out THERE.

I´m not even going to touch your "engineered" rear braces.

Okay... If you say so.

[Optimator]

But you do pot bogus ass dyno graphs? That plot is not real.

Torque = horsepower @ 5252 rpm. Always.

Mr. TwoJs, that assumes that both vertical axes have the same range. They don't in this graph.

[gstuning]

Okay... If you say so.

At least somthing is sinking in.

[JGood]

busting out the loller truck for a lol thread

[DCColegrove]

Mr. TwoJs, that assumes that both vertical axes have the same range. They don't in this graph.

Can you explain it because I honestly don't get what the hell it means...

I had it because I was going to e-mail it to someone to interpret for me.

[DCColegrove]

At least somthing is sinking in.

I'll stand toe to toe with you on chassis braces though...

[TwoJ's]

Mr. TwoJs, that assumes that both vertical axes have the same range. They don't in this graph.

Ah hah. Correct you are. That is foreign to me.


STILL ISN'T A GRAph from an NA m20 though.

[Optimator]

So if you look at the data at 3660 rpm, you can see torque = 288 ft-lbs (or so). Multiply these numbers together, divide by 5252, and you get 200. At 3660 rpm you can see the power is right around 200 hp.

QEAD.

[DCColegrove]

So if you look at the data at 3660 rpm, you can see torque = 288 ft-lbs (or so). Multiply these numbers together, divide by 5252, and you get 200. At 3660 rpm you can see the power is right around 200 hp.

QEAD.

Thank you...

I have never seen a graph that looked like an x though... Can you explain a bit more?

[JGood]

Can you explain it because I honestly don't get what the hell it means...

I had it because I was going to e-mail it to someone to interpret for me.

I have never seen a graph that looked like an x though... Can you explain a bit more?

You can stop playing games and jump in any second now with your infinite wisdom...

[TwoJ's]

QEAD.

Did you mean QED? My set theory prof made us end proofs with QED; which is quod erat demonstrandum. I've never heard QEAD though.

[gstuning]

I'll stand toe to toe with you on chassis braces though...

I´m so assuming you took the chassis and BENT it in a bench and derived all your construction parameters from there.

i.e the bending stresses and how much angular movement there was with x amount of force to the shock towers and subframe and where thus able to find the the ideal bracing to stop the chassis from bending. Or did you just weld some stuff in a few times to make it stop bending?

There is a difference between imperical "engineering" (fiddling) and engineering (good old math)
I´m all for discussion , but only when people answer with discussion and not little remarks.

[Stephen]

Wow, i came back from a psych final and BOOM