Kadunza S54 ITB Adapter Plate Project

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • digger
    replied
    from what i found

    M50 manifold is 55x25 and M52 is 45 x 23 which means an equivalent diameter of

    39.75 and 34.25mm respectively

    Leave a comment:


  • pantelones
    replied
    Originally posted by digger
    lots of ITB kits avilable these days
    Indeed...

    I don't really care to investigate, but are these even close to being the right size for most s/m5x motors? I know that most of the ITB's for the m20 are wayyy to big and are not maximizing their efficiency. I have a feeling that you would need a pretty well built motor to effectively utilize the s54 ITB, and if you are spending that much $$$ you probably would rather buy an entire kit that is custom to your set up. It's a good idea, but there is more to a motor than just slapping some cool parts on it and saying FUCK YEAH! Since you're in this deep, proceed... :popcorn:

    Leave a comment:


  • CoreyZ
    replied
    The bottom end exploding at higher revs is a good one!

    We need more people experimenting with ATI dampers

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by 10Toes
    If they really wanted to make power they would avoid this setup all together and just get an S54.
    seriously where is the fun in that?

    lots of ITB kits avilable these days no excuses for not making big power from non S engines
    Last edited by digger; 04-08-2014, 01:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jalves619
    replied
    For someone running a standalone, will the vacuum "log" provide an adequate map signal? I wouldn't want to run alpha N because I intend to run FI as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyboyx
    replied
    Originally posted by 10Toes
    If they really wanted to make power they would avoid this setup all together and just get an S54.

    yes, there is that. however, some people already have s5x's in their car and don't want to spend another 5k+ to reswap. if this setup, a set of schricks, a 540i hfm, and a TRM tune can add 30-40+ hp, it will be a better option for me and perhaps a lot of others.

    i am actually amazed you were able to get the throttle position sensor to clear the vanos solenoid.

    as far as throttle linkage, can you just take parts off the stock single barrel throttle body and modify them a little?
    Last edited by flyboyx; 04-08-2014, 10:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dude8383
    replied
    Been watching your progress on FB. Needless to say I'm super happy to see that you guys are moving forward with this.

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    Sweet nice work

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertK
    replied
    Originally posted by 10Toes
    If they really wanted to make power they would avoid this setup all together and just get an S54.

    Leave a comment:


  • LJ851
    replied
    Originally posted by 10Toes
    If they really wanted to make power they would avoid this setup all together and just get an S54.


    Hee hee.

    Leave a comment:


  • 10Toes
    replied
    Originally posted by digger
    i recommend putting the adapter with a head and a runner on the flow bench, there are easy gains getting the transition and alignment between runner and head sorted.
    the difference between a good adapter and poor one is 10-15whp. i'm not familiar with the real estate you have and other practicalities but the longer the adapter the better the transition will be. it will also make the runner volume smaller which is good when you have big throttles
    If they really wanted to make power they would avoid this setup all together and just get an S54.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhaurimn
    replied
    wow....definitely interested to see how this pans out

    Leave a comment:


  • oliver.r
    replied
    if this was available for a m20 i would be inclined to swap one into the 2002

    Leave a comment:


  • JCarp90
    replied
    boop

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    in

    Leave a comment:

Working...