Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Its coming......Again!!!! God Damn Dems

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I'm Calling for the Country of Texiansas! y'all can have the rest of the country

    COUNTRY of TEXISIANSAS

    In case things get a little tough during the next few months we IN LOUISIANA, TEXAS , OKLAHOMA , & ARKANSAS have a plan.

    Maybe you don't know it, but LOUISIANA , TEXAS , OKLAHOMA , & ARKANSAS HAVE legal right to secede from the Union . (Reference the Texas/LOUISIANA-American Annexation Treaty of 1848.)

    US TEXISIANSANS love y'all Americans, but we'll probably have to take action since Barack Obama won the election and is now the President of the U.S.A. We'll miss ya'll though.

    Here is what can happen:

    1. Barack Hussein Obama, after becoming the President of the United States , begins to try and create a socialist country, then Texas , LOUISIANA , ARKANSAS , & OKLAHOMA announces that it is going to secede from the Union ..

    2. George W. Bush becomes the President of the Republic of TEXISIANSAS . You might think that he doesn't talk too pretty, but we haven't had another terrorist attack and the economy was fine until the effects of the Democrats lowering the qualifications for home loans came to roost.

    So what does TEXISIANSAS have to do to survive as a Republic?

    1. NASA is just south of Houston , Texas . We will control the space industry.

    2. We refine over 90% of the gasoline in the United States ..

    3. Defense Industry--we have over 65% of it. The term "Don't mess with THE SOUTH," will take on a whole new meaning.

    4. Oil - we can supply all the oil that the Republic of TEXISIANSAS will need for the next 300 years. What will the other states do? Gee, we don't know. Why not ask Obama?

    5. Natural Gas - again, we have all we need and it's too bad about those Northern States. John Kerry and Al Gore will just have to figure out a way to keep them warm...

    6. Computer Industry - we lead the nation in producing computer chips and communications equipment - small companies like Texas Instruments, Dell Computer, EDS, Raytheon, National Semiconductor, Motorola, Intel, AMD, Atmel, Applied Materials, Ball Misconduct, Dallas Semiconductor, Nortel, Alcatel, etc. The list goes on and on.

    7. Medical Care - We have the research centers for cancer research, the best burn centers and the top trauma units in the world, as well as other large health centers.

    8. We have enough colleges to keep educating and making smarter citizens: University of Texas , Texas A&M, Texas Tech, UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA , OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, UL-LAFAYETTE, UL-MONORE, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS , LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY , ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY ..

    9. We have an intelligent and energetic work force and it isn't restricted by a bunch of unions. Here in TEXISIANSAS, we are a Right to Work State and, therefore, it's every man and woman for themselves. We just go out and get the job done.. And if we don't like the way one company operates, we get a job somewhere else.

    10. We have essential control of the paper, plastics, and insurance industries, etc.

    11. In case of a foreign invasion, we have the TEXISIANSAS National Guard, the TEXISIANSAS Air National Guard, and several military bases. We don't have an Army, but since everybody down here has at least six rifles and a pile of ammo, we can raise an Army in 24 hours if we need one. If the situation really gets bad, we can always call the Department of Public Safety and ask them to send over the Texas Rangers.

    12. We are totally self-sufficient in beef, poultry, hogs, and several types of grain, fruit and vegetables, and let's not forget seafood from the Gulf. Also, everybody down here knows how to cook them so that they taste good. We don't need any food.

    13. FIVE of the ten largest cities in the United States , and THIRTY TWO of the 100 largest cities in the United States are located in TEXISIANSAS. And TEXISIANSAS also has more land than California , New York , New Jersey , Connecticut , Delaware , Hawaii , Massachusetts , Maryland , Rhode Island , and Vermont combined.

    14. Trade: FIVE of the ten largest ports in the United States are located in TEXISIANSAS

    15. We also manufacture cars down here, but we don't need to. You see, nothing rusts in TEXISIANSAS so our vehicles stay beautiful and run well for decades.

    This just names a few of the items that will keep the Republic of TEXISIANSAS in good shape. There isn't a thing out there that we need and don't have.

    Now to the rest of you folks in the United States under President Obama:

    Since you won't have the refineries to get gas for your cars, only President Obama will be able to drive around in his big 9 mpg SUV. The rest of the United States will have to walk or ride bikes.

    You won't have any TV as the Space Center in Houston will cut off satellite communications.

    You won't have any natural gas to heat your homes, but since Mr. Obama has predicted global warming, you will not need the gas as long as you survive the 2000 years it will take to get enough heat from Global Warming.

    In other words, the rest of ya'll in the USA are screwed!

    Signed, The People of TEXISIANSAS

    P.S. This is not a threatening letter - just a note to give you something to think about!

    Sleep well tonight 'cause the eyes of TEXISIANSAS are on YOU!!
    stephenbrody.com

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Anthrax View Post
      I thought Palin banned the r-word.
      Palin banning word "retard" is like black people banning word "n*gger"...
      Last edited by Aptyp; 02-22-2010, 07:44 PM.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by u3b3rg33k View Post
        What? No way. There's no water over there, and California is a lost cause.
        Uh there is a ton of water in OR/WA.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by 88driftIS View Post
          no cost to us... you have got to be kidding me. How ignorant are you? And if 11 trillion is such a little amount how about you pay for it, or your kids, or their kids?

          ANYONE can get health care in the US, all you have to do is show up at a emergency room and they have to take care of you. Yeah you'll owe them money, but never will you be turned down for legitimate issues. I work at a grocery store(full time student and thats all I can get) and I get sick of seeing people abusing the system.
          It's $1tril over 10 years. We spent more than twice that in 2009 alone.


          Emergency Departments are only required to stabilize you in life-threatening situations.
          Originally posted by Gruelius
          and i do not know what bugg brakes are.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by reelop19 View Post
            Tax dollars also pay for a board to discuss your healthcare. Board then says you're too old, expensive, not sick enough for healthcare.
            I hope you're not referring to the fabricated "death panel" scare tactic.

            The provision in the bill compensates providers to discuss end-of-life care with their patients. There is not one competent provider who does not agree with that.
            Originally posted by Gruelius
            and i do not know what bugg brakes are.

            Comment


              #36
              TexasTerp -
              cars beep boop

              Comment


                #37
                Oh fellas. Calm down. You're all so excitable that it makes good discussion impossible and engaging in such hyperbole does nothing to advance your position. Do any of you REALLY know our medical system well enough to toss around a blanket judgement on the bill? I sure as hell can't make that claim, and I'll also agree that I question the government's ability to do the same. From what I have read, there's a good bit I'd want to look into further and some parts I just don't understand. But even though there's certainly an argument to be made to take this piece-by-piece, my own personal lack of understanding isn't a good reason to say "toss it and start anew."

                I guess I agree with Ken in saying that if you don't believe healthcare is a right that we'll never agree. And it's likely safe to assume that you're anti big-government. I'm probably a bit financially conservative myself - I assume that we're all well-meaning people and that we draw the line in different places; where's yours? Should government not provide education, or transportation infrastructure? I can only imagine that you haven't had the misfortune of watching a loved one with real (and sometimes pre-existing) conditions have to jump through the hoops of how the system works. These people are not anecdotes.

                The "death panel" point is just ridiculous. It's a fear based talking point. Besides, if you look at the amount of money that goes into end of life care, it's pretty incredible. Nobody is suggesting that people should be talked into dying quicker, but really, look into it. 60 Minutes had a good bit on it a few months ago.

                Suggesting that those who are for socialized medicine want to eliminate all free markets and are interested in communism is anti-intellectual drivel. If you truly believe we don't have enough protection (maybe you're convinced you're taking part in it) against becoming Russia's failed past, then well, I don't know what to say. I'd hate to walk around feeling that Orwellian fear, so I guess I can empathize to a certain degree.

                To say that people will take worse care of themselves because they're "assured a B", I disagree there, too. I think it's safe to say that future financial consequences are the last thing on people's minds when they slam a 3rd burger down or light a cigarette.

                Tort reform: I agree it should be in there but the percentage of financial effect it would have is minimal. I agree with the across state lines thing, but I bet that's super complicated with state regulations and lobbyists and etc getting in the way.

                Thursday is gonna be exciting.

                Sorry for the tl;dr-ness of this.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Bill 84 318i View Post
                  Oh fellas. Calm down. You're all so excitable that it makes good discussion impossible and engaging in such hyperbole does nothing to advance your position. Do any of you REALLY know our medical system well enough to toss around a blanket judgement on the bill? I sure as hell can't make that claim, and I'll also agree that I question the government's ability to do the same. From what I have read, there's a good bit I'd want to look into further and some parts I just don't understand. But even though there's certainly an argument to be made to take this piece-by-piece, my own personal lack of understanding isn't a good reason to say "toss it and start anew."

                  I guess I agree with Ken in saying that if you don't believe healthcare is a right that we'll never agree. And it's likely safe to assume that you're anti big-government. I'm probably a bit financially conservative myself - I assume that we're all well-meaning people and that we draw the line in different places; where's yours? Should government not provide education, or transportation infrastructure? I can only imagine that you haven't had the misfortune of watching a loved one with real (and sometimes pre-existing) conditions have to jump through the hoops of how the system works. These people are not anecdotes.

                  The "death panel" point is just ridiculous. It's a fear based talking point. Besides, if you look at the amount of money that goes into end of life care, it's pretty incredible. Nobody is suggesting that people should be talked into dying quicker, but really, look into it. 60 Minutes had a good bit on it a few months ago.

                  Suggesting that those who are for socialized medicine want to eliminate all free markets and are interested in communism is anti-intellectual drivel. If you truly believe we don't have enough protection (maybe you're convinced you're taking part in it) against becoming Russia's failed past, then well, I don't know what to say. I'd hate to walk around feeling that Orwellian fear, so I guess I can empathize to a certain degree.

                  To say that people will take worse care of themselves because they're "assured a B", I disagree there, too. I think it's safe to say that future financial consequences are the last thing on people's minds when they slam a 3rd burger down or light a cigarette.

                  Tort reform: I agree it should be in there but the percentage of financial effect it would have is minimal. I agree with the across state lines thing, but I bet that's super complicated with state regulations and lobbyists and etc getting in the way.

                  Thursday is gonna be exciting.

                  Sorry for the tl;dr-ness of this.

                  Yes I do know enough about our system to know the healthcare bill as is needs to be scrapped.
                  That's not saying there aren't some good things in it which there are (although reading the whole thing just isn't going to happen for me). But the point here is they are trying to force this down our throats and there are things in that bill that the average American doesn't want.
                  This is where both sides suck cock. Neither really wants to work together to formulate a bill that will work. But that's a given since money and kick backs are the main concern for our politicians. Let alone saying whatever they have to to stay in office. Even as Obama has been doing.
                  Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                  "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

                  ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by TexasTerp View Post
                    2. George W. Bush becomes the President of the Republic of TEXISIANSAS . You might think that he doesn't talk too pretty, but we haven't had another terrorist attack and the economy was fine until the effects of the Democrats lowering the qualifications for home loans came to roost.



                    I seriously lol'd
                    Originally posted by accident
                    I have achieved the title of Douche of the month.
                    Discuss.
                    Originally posted by kronus
                    It was probably pissed off because it didn't want to pay taxes for poor people's healthcare.
                    1990 300ZX TT 5spd ($6,000)
                    1991 318i 4dr 5spd (DD)

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by reelop19 View Post
                      healthcare is given by the government via tax dollars. Tax dollars also pay for a board to discuss your healthcare. Board then says you're too old, expensive, not sick enough for healthcare.
                      That's how it is now. It is called private for-profit health insurance.

                      Like this:

                      Originally posted by reelop19 View Post
                      healthcare is given by the insurance companies via your insurance payments. Your insurance payments also pay for a board to discuss your healthcare. Board then says you're too old, expensive, not sick enough for healthcare.

                      S54B32 swap in progress. Status: Getting There

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by reelop19 View Post
                        http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100222/D9E19OD80.html

                        They're calling it a compromise between the White House and the Dems. Wait, didn't they say it was the Republicans who are thwarting all of this? This time they're proposal is way worse than the last one. Why do that? Probably to get some politicians to look at the old proposals in a positive light. I hate LIBS!!
                        i don't understand why more people don't see that it's in the ruling class's best interest to keep the american populace divided and fighting with each other. news flash, republicans: if you aren't in the top 0.5% of income earners, they don't give a shit about you, because you are not among the people who fill their campaign coffers.

                        they are not looking out for *your* best interests when they shift the tax burden from the ultra-wealthy to the lower- and middle-classes. don't think i'm following a party line here, either, because Obama has done neither anything he promised to do, nor one single thing that separates him in practice from the 8 years of Bush doctrine that preceded him. troop surge in afghanistan, without any clear mission statement? as far as i am concerned he is "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".

                        distracting us with issues like health care (which, btw, we could easily pay for if we weren't dumping trillions of dollars into a fatuous war in iraq), and whether or not gay couples should be able to marry, and all the other crap that glenn beck and keith olbermann argue about by proxy on TV every fucking day is exactly how they keep us from paying attention to how we are actually getting screwed.

                        congratulations OP- you are among the new generation of Lenin's Useful Idiots.
                        past:
                        1989 325is (learner shitbox)
                        1986 325e (turbo dorito)
                        1991 318ic (5-lug ITB)
                        1985 323i baur
                        current:
                        1995 M3 (suspension, 17x9/255-40, borla)

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by dk View Post
                          i don't understand why more people don't see that it's in the ruling class's best interest to keep the american populace divided and fighting with each other. news flash, republicans: if you aren't in the top 0.5% of income earners, they don't give a shit about you, because you are not among the people who fill their campaign coffers.

                          they are not looking out for *your* best interests when they shift the tax burden from the ultra-wealthy to the lower- and middle-classes. don't think i'm following a party line here, either, because Obama has done neither anything he promised to do, nor one single thing that separates him in practice from the 8 years of Bush doctrine that preceded him. troop surge in afghanistan, without any clear mission statement? as far as i am concerned he is "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".

                          distracting us with issues like health care (which, btw, we could easily pay for if we weren't dumping trillions of dollars into a fatuous war in iraq), and whether or not gay couples should be able to marry, and all the other crap that glenn beck and keith olbermann argue about by proxy on TV every fucking day is exactly how they keep us from paying attention to how we are actually getting screwed.

                          congratulations OP- you are among the new generation of Lenin's Useful Idiots.
                          Best post yet. It's called "manufacturing consent".

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Bill 84 318i View Post
                            Tort reform: I agree it should be in there but the percentage of financial effect it would have is minimal. I agree with the across state lines thing, but I bet that's super complicated with state regulations and lobbyists and etc getting in the way.
                            This is awesome. Gov't should take over healthcare because they've proven they can't run anything efficiently. But we can't open up insurance sales across state lines or handle tort reform because it's too hard.

                            Tort reform is easy. Putting a cap on monetary compensation for surgical/medical injuries.

                            I don't understand the litigious society we leave in.


                            Selling insurance across state lines? Also easy. Remove the law that says you can't do it.

                            It's not HARD, but the lobbyists don't want it to happen.

                            Look up how much more a health 28 year old male pays for insurance in NY or NJ, and look at how much I pay here in OK.
                            Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
                            Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries

                            www.gutenparts.com
                            One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X