I worked at Mistsibishi, Iv driven a new Evo computer tuned more gas more boost, and it is a helllllll of a ride. It really is. Such good acceleration, nice looking car. But I would still choose the M3 anyyy day.
The evo would get old quick i think, and theres not the most mods you can do really, its kinda of a boring car. As much as i was shaking after driving a couple evo's, M3 all day Bmw engineering over Chrysler/mitsubishi.
Evo X or m3?
Collapse
X
-
You have a fabric layer over the metal in the trunk of your e30.
I agree on the bumper though. Symmetry and usefulness is nice.Leave a comment:
-
lol, chill bro. I've never seen a CSL in person so I have to take his word for it. I don't see the point in putting cardboard over steel, honestly. You'd think one or the other would be sufficient. *shrug*
Still, I think the front bumper/valence looks stupid as hell. I get that they're trying to save weight, but I prefer foglights and brake vents to one oddly placed hole.
You are wrong, sir.Leave a comment:
-
OMFG the trunk floor is not made out of cardboard, there is a cardboard layer over the steel. You dont have to take EVERYTHING jeremy clarkson says literally.Leave a comment:
-
The CSL is stupid. If you're going to actually race the car, maybe it's alright, but if you plan on driving it anywhere on roads, it's stupid. No a/c, radio, fake trunk, etc.
gtfo
Also, Z4M > Z3M.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Trust me, if the e36 euro was available here I would have been all over that. But if the e36 euro was available here then the e46 csl would have been as well and I would pick the csl over any other BMW or mitsubishi any day of the week.Car and Driver just published their "Four Generations of M3" article. The E36 (Euro) was .09 second behind the E46 around Ascari, and just 1MPH behind in top speed. The E46 aint all that.
The new Lancer is bloated compared with the outgoing chassis.
Like someone else said, get a Z4 M Coupe.
Engine work FTW. Body kits FTL.Leave a comment:
-

Leave a comment: