Porsche 944's
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by george graves
Are you kidding me? That nerd doesn't even know how his dick works, let alone a car. -
Touche. I, for whatever reason, had it in my head that the C4 was transaxle. I don't know why. My old roommate even bought a T56 from a C4 for his Olds manual swap.
No one cares about those.
1988 Bronzitbeige Metallic 325e 2-door S50 turbo (OO=( )=OO)
2008 VW Rabbit
1991 Audi 200 20vtq WagonComment
-
944s and 928s are bad ass... Oddly enough, if you talk to the guys who own and drive these cars, most of them will tell you that the 928 is the more reliable option. They are actually really well done. Porsche's first try at a water cooled production V8 and they nailed it. It's too bad parts are stupid expensive or I'd own one.
BimmerTim - if you drove a late 70's or early 80's 911 back to back with the same vintage 928S, you'd probably change your mind. The 928S's were faster, handled better, and were better built...Last edited by euroshark; 02-04-2011, 08:44 AM.'88 528e /// '88 M5 /// '89 951 /// '98 E430 /// '02 M5Comment
-
I've never driven a 928, only an older, 78ish, 911. And some newer stuff.
One of my coworkers has a 356, but he won't let me drive it. When he pulls it out of winter storage, I'll continue to try though.
1988 Bronzitbeige Metallic 325e 2-door S50 turbo (OO=( )=OO)
2008 VW Rabbit
1991 Audi 200 20vtq WagonComment
-
I just don't see why so many people think that because a front engine Porsche isn't a true Porsche. I mean ya of course there most known for rear engine and thats whats most common but there front engine cars have been great. Alot of the older ones had problems with the dead wight of the rear engine making them want to spin out and hard to control and the front engines were a break through pretty much with the 50/50 wight distribution. And of course there front engines give use poor people a chance to own a Porsche :pComment
Comment