The start of my chess computer project!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gasturbine
    Banned
    • Sep 2012
    • 261

    #1

    The start of my chess computer project!

    HP DL740 Server w/8 Intel Dual Core Xeon Processors (total of 16 cores) @ 2.7Ghz ea. 20Gb RAM and a 76Gb SCSI hard drive. OS will be a cut down version of Windows Sever 2003.

    Chess engine will be Houdini 3.0 Pro, designed specifically for multiprocessor machines. Calculations put the number crunching monster at over 10,000 kN/s making an ELO of over 3100...over 300 points stronger than IMBs Deep Blue chess computer!



    It's name? Garry of course.



    More pix as the project proceeds.
    Last edited by Gasturbine; 12-06-2012, 07:02 AM.
  • Turf1600
    R3V OG
    • Nov 2006
    • 9815

    #2
    ...what does it do?
    "We praise or find fault, depending on which of the two provides more opportunity for our powers of judgement to shine."

    Comment

    • CarsSuck
      E30 Modder
      • Oct 2005
      • 968

      #3
      I think it beats other computers at chess.

      OP, what will Garry compete against?
      --Will

      Comment

      • lambo
        Captain Scene Points
        • Feb 2010
        • 10953

        #4
        Originally posted by CarsSuck
        OP, what will Garry compete against?
        Skynet

        Originally posted by SpasticDwarf;n6449866
        Honestly I built it just to have a place to sit and listen to Hotline Bling on repeat.

        Comment

        • gtdragon980
          E30 Mastermind
          • Jun 2008
          • 1808

          #5
          So pretty much, nothing should be able to beat this computer in chess, Human or computer?

          FREE BITCOINS!! http://qoinpro.com/71690d1639966bfbf223bf16538cec21
          Originally posted by scabzzzz
          I stand up, pull my dick out, and asked my gf to give me some noggin... Well, she starts laughing at me and I freaked out and ran off and locked myself in a bedroom.
          1989 325i - Project/weekend driver
          2002 325i - DD
          2005 Suzuki SV650 - Toy

          Comment

          • Gasturbine
            Banned
            • Sep 2012
            • 261

            #6
            Originally posted by CarsSuck
            I think it beats other computers at chess.

            OP, what will Garry compete against?
            Other computers, people, and installed chess engines.

            Its sort of exercise really. I work in a IT office and a lot of us play chess, so thought it would be a fun project, but its also useful for analysing your games, blunder checking, engine tourneys, and deep database searches.

            At full power under STC (40 moves in 2 hours) it will beat 99.999% of all chess players on the planet, but it can be dumbed down to your level for a fun game you might even win.

            Comment

            • Gasturbine
              Banned
              • Sep 2012
              • 261

              #7
              Originally posted by gtdragon980
              So pretty much, nothing should be able to beat this computer in chess, Human or computer?
              This hardware is about 4-5 years old...a newer platform with even faster processors/RAM would be a little stronger, but I dont know anybody willing to pay $5000 for a dedicated chess computer, so the short answer is yes...it will kick ass and take names!

              Comment

              • Gasturbine
                Banned
                • Sep 2012
                • 261

                #8
                One thing that may not be coming across in the pic is how big this thing is...

                It is 7" tall, 17" wide, 29" deep, and weighs 105 lbs. :mrgreen:

                Comment

                • iamsam
                  Advanced Member
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 172

                  #9
                  10,000 kilonewtons per second?? holy balls....

                  Comment

                  • Gasturbine
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2012
                    • 261

                    #10
                    Originally posted by iamcreepingdeath
                    10,000 kilonewtons per second?? holy balls....
                    No, thats "nodes" per second, or plys if you will.

                    Comment

                    • TwoJ's
                      R3V Elite
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 4908

                      #11
                      Originally posted by iamcreepingdeath
                      10,000 kilonewtons per second?? holy balls....
                      lol... yank?

                      Comment

                      • Pac1373
                        E30 Mastermind
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 1746

                        #12
                        Originally posted by lambo
                        Skynet
                        oh shi....

                        this is how it begins.
                        Originally Posted by ACMF74
                        i clicked on this cuz i saw p3nis

                        Comment

                        • iamsam
                          Advanced Member
                          • Jun 2008
                          • 172

                          #13
                          Originally posted by TwoJ's
                          lol... yank?
                          mechanical engineer.


                          and for the record, I knew that that's not what it meant. For one, force per time is not very commonly used, as it has no real common application. Nothing much really has a rate of force increase/decrease. I was just kidding that "kN/s" only means kilonewton per second, and nothing else.

                          Comment

                          • TwoJ's
                            R3V Elite
                            • Oct 2005
                            • 4908

                            #14
                            Originally posted by iamcreepingdeath
                            mechanical engineer.


                            and for the record, I knew that that's not what it meant. For one, force per time is not very commonly used, as it has no real common application. Nothing much really has a rate of force increase/decrease. I was just kidding that "kN/s" only means kilonewton per second, and nothing else.
                            Mechanical engineer too... that doesn't impress.

                            It is pretty clear what you meant, it is ok.

                            Comment

                            • downforce22
                              No R3VLimiter
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 3186

                              #15
                              Originally posted by CarsSuck
                              I think it beats other computers at chess.

                              OP, what will Garry compete against?
                              chatroulette
                              318iS Track Rat :nice: www.drive4corners.com
                              '86 325iX 3.1 Stroker Turbo '86 S38B36 325

                              No one makes this car anymore. The government won't allow them, normal people won't buy them. So it's up to us: the freaks, the weirdos, the informed. To buy them, to appreciate them, and most importantly, to drive them.

                              Comment

                              Working...