Front is -3, rear is -3.2
My e30's I run about the same.
Cars that look good Slammed/Stanced
Collapse
X
-
Fuck yeah suicide Lincolns. You get Mobsteel and Continental hashtagged in the same post and it'll make my dingle tingle.Leave a comment:
-
I don't really liked slammed cars, or Panthers, but put them together in Police Interceptor trim, and there's something great about it:
Also slab-sided stuff like MKIII continentals are the business on bags:
Leave a comment:
-
Also, I don't know anything about Hondas, but it seems like a light, FWD car like a Civic wouldn't need that much camber at the back (SE30 rear are at -2.5° or so?), but again, I don't know much about those chassis'.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Almost all cars looks better lowered/slammed within reason.
Way fewer truly look "good" that way.
(I appreciate everything in this thread so far, I'm talking about the kids who stance their grandmother's '90s or '00's <insert bottom-of-the-barrel-appliance-car here>, spray half the car with plastidip, post it up on stanceworks and assume everyone will worship them as a stance icon... but that's a story for another time)Leave a comment:
-
No more than 1.5* of camber?? LOL. My STC Civic has 3*. Function over form.Leave a comment:
-
I like low big body cars. As for e30's I prefer a compromise between lows and big tires.
Like Sebo's
Leave a comment:
-
-
Most 50's Caddys, 1965 Lincoln Continental. Never been a fan of the "Stance" scene, I love a good low-rider.Leave a comment:
-
Hmm... If I were going to slam a car, I'd probably choose an older luxury car, like an old Benz, or an old (50s/60s) pickup. And I'd use bags. Because fuck having to drive an inch off the ground 24/7.
Slamming a sports car or sports sedan is stupid IMO. Completely ruins the function of the car.
Last edited by rturbo 930; 01-31-2015, 11:48 AM.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: