So he had a radio collar on, unless otherwise noted in the rule book, that may NOT mean hes is also "protected" everywhere he goes..... Here in the USA we have lots of tagged and collared animals that are part of a "study" that are lawfully taken by hunters and fishermen, its what you do when that happens that is more important.... And with the information we have, is the biggest crux of the issue here and more than likely form the sounds of it WHY the outfitter and he guide have their asses in a sling. I have not read anything that specifically states anything more than what you just said, he has radio collar and was in a study, that still does not mean he god status if he leaves the preserve. And again it might be hard to see that collar under the mane of a FUCKING LION so that leave lots of room for a legitimate mistake to occur
Next if baiting is a legal practice and is in the rule books for this kind of hunt, then what are they going to dothat also does NOT mean this particular Lion was "targeted" just means he smelled dinner and went looking I mean baiting that close to a preserve "may be legal" again with out the rule book we dont know that its kinda sketchy on the ethics side of things for me..... With the info I have seen this is more of an ethical Vs legal mind exercise with out the rule book in front of us....
As for "shooting it with a gun" how else do you propose ending the injured animals suffering any faster, and I know in some cases when it comes to hunting DANGEROUS game in some places in Africa there are provisions for just such occasions when arrow fails to do the job and you have a wounded DANGEROUS animal running lose.
Next if baiting is a legal practice and is in the rule books for this kind of hunt, then what are they going to dothat also does NOT mean this particular Lion was "targeted" just means he smelled dinner and went looking I mean baiting that close to a preserve "may be legal" again with out the rule book we dont know that its kinda sketchy on the ethics side of things for me..... With the info I have seen this is more of an ethical Vs legal mind exercise with out the rule book in front of us....
As for "shooting it with a gun" how else do you propose ending the injured animals suffering any faster, and I know in some cases when it comes to hunting DANGEROUS game in some places in Africa there are provisions for just such occasions when arrow fails to do the job and you have a wounded DANGEROUS animal running lose.

Comment