the man in charge is still the man in charge.
he is commander in chief of the armed forces. taking out osama was his call and his game. dont discredit the man just because you dont like him. he calls the shots.
unless we are just going to start assuming the military does whatever it wants without the president. like bush was not responsible for entering iraq. nope. he was not. he didnt make that call. Gen. Franks decided he needed to get his action on and got that moving under his own power...
he is commander in chief of the armed forces. taking out osama was his call and his game. dont discredit the man just because you dont like him. he calls the shots.
unless we are just going to start assuming the military does whatever it wants without the president. like bush was not responsible for entering iraq. nope. he was not. he didnt make that call. Gen. Franks decided he needed to get his action on and got that moving under his own power...
Comment