to delve into detail, look at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...d?bill=h111-45
but, here's some more details beyond the summary.
applications for licenses:
(6) a certification by the applicant that the applicant will keep any firearm owned by the applicant safely stored and out of the possession of persons who have not attained 18 years of age;
and, most concerning to me:
which means, to the best I can read it, warrants and due process will no longer be required for federal authorities to search any place which is suspected of selling guns. And while this isn't an end-of-the-world clause, it opens the door for this to be used as legal cover for entering any place of business.
I believe from a Law class I took as a Senior in college that incriminating evidence found when not specifically searching for it is admissible in court. Meaning, they search the place during business hours- however those get defined- without a warrant and find some other documents or evidence during a thorough search of the premises which is now admissible evidence. Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong. I don't seriously believe it would work that way, but if true the possibility exists.
but, here's some more details beyond the summary.
applications for licenses:
(6) a certification by the applicant that the applicant will keep any firearm owned by the applicant safely stored and out of the possession of persons who have not attained 18 years of age;
and, most concerning to me:
SEC. 403. INSPECTIONS.
In order to ascertain compliance with this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the regulations and orders issued under this Act, the Attorney General may, during regular business hours, enter any place in which firearms or firearm products are manufactured, stored, or held, for distribution in commerce, and inspect those areas where the products are so manufactured, stored, or held.
In order to ascertain compliance with this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the regulations and orders issued under this Act, the Attorney General may, during regular business hours, enter any place in which firearms or firearm products are manufactured, stored, or held, for distribution in commerce, and inspect those areas where the products are so manufactured, stored, or held.
I believe from a Law class I took as a Senior in college that incriminating evidence found when not specifically searching for it is admissible in court. Meaning, they search the place during business hours- however those get defined- without a warrant and find some other documents or evidence during a thorough search of the premises which is now admissible evidence. Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong. I don't seriously believe it would work that way, but if true the possibility exists.
Comment