If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It proves that that earnings of the top 2% cant pay for all this spending, so we (the less than 250k earners) that were promised no tax increase, will see a raise in our taxes via a direct tax on income, or indirect by taxing business that supply necessary goods and services. One way or another more of our money will make it into the govt and be pissed away.
Thats what it proves god dammit you guys have thick skulls
Pinepig, thats awesome I wish I could get away with it where I live.
Originally posted by Fusion
If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville
The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
William Pitt-
The smoke and mirrors are entirely on the article's part. I see no reason the government should be able to pay off an entire, huge stimulus package after just one tax cycle. This is, after all, a loan, and as such, is paid back in a finite number of years whose number definitely exceeds 1.
Essentially, the only thing the article succeeds in doing is claiming that the US's rich make about as much in a year as the government spends.
^^^ dude.. that's the budget. It's how much he's going to spend this year. If we don't collect enough taxes, we'll have to borrow the money a la deficit spending, which he has promised to reverse.
Well, I don't think deficit spending has been looked down on much in the last couple of years, so it's allright, right?
In all seriousness, it's unrealistic to expect any sort of stimulus without spending money. While the current plan isn't instantly sustainable, it sets down a framework (via jobs, investment in technology, etc) that has the best chance of becoming sustainable in a reasonable time frame that I've seen since I've been old enough to care. You can't instantly reverse the current situation, but every little scrap of money thrown at it will help.
wait.. so let's spend money we don't have because we'll eventually make all that money back and more by spending this money now. Isn't that how we got in this in the first place?
wait.. so let's spend money we don't have because we'll eventually make all that money back and more by spending this money now. Isn't that how we got in this in the first place?
There's a difference between completely unsustainable and potentially sustainable. (call me an idealist, call Obama a shill, whatever, there's a difference.) What we did to get in this position was unsustainable, in that it provided no infrastructure for creating investment opportunities. (other than military contractors)
This plan is an attempt to bring back a sustainable infrastructure, in that the systems it creates and invests in provide a steady, positive return after an appropriate initial amount is paid.
^^^ dude.. that's the budget. It's how much he's going to spend this year. If we don't collect enough taxes, we'll have to borrow the money a la deficit spending, which he has promised to reverse.
Don't you know those big words confuse the Obamabots?
Keep it simple. Hope. Change. Rich. Tax.
They understand those words, but not the big ones like "balance" and "budget" nor do they understand those concepts.
Comment