Prop 8

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by Dozyproductions
    gays got their title while all of our freedoms have eroded.
    What? you'll have to explain your reasoning on this

    Leave a comment:


  • Cabriolet
    replied
    ugly chicks like meg griffin have no hope now

    Leave a comment:


  • Dozyproductions
    replied
    gays got their title while all of our freedoms have eroded.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Fuck Scalia forever and ever

    Leave a comment:


  • tjts1
    replied
    Oh great, now everyone is going to go out and marry a chihuahua this big!

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Bump, good to see this was finally settled by SCOTUS this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • ck_taft325is
    replied
    Kershaw has no capacity for reasoned or educated thought by his own admission via his post criticizing someone for no "abstract" thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • markseven
    replied
    Originally posted by Kershaw
    that is the most ridiculous statement i have read all night. (and i've been reading mrsleeve and joshh.)

    have you no capacity for abstract thought?
    In case you haven't figuered it out yet:

    "70 percent of African-Americans voted Yes on 8, as did 52 percent of Latinos and 49 percent of Asians"

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 Cabrio
    For those of you still supporting building a Mosque in the shadows of the Twin Towers, read this:

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...e-harm-th.html
    911 Mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf Blames Christians: "The US and the West must acknowledge the harm they have done to Muslims before terrorism can end"

    when reading the context it does not sound like Feisal is making a demand, so much as expressing how to fix the problem at hand, it may work it may not. That is his opinon.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by E30 Cabrio
    Someone mentioned Olbermann in the thread and it got off track.

    I mentioned that Olbermann had a meltdown on the 5th anniversary of 9-11 because Bush hadn't rebuilt the site, yet Olbermann supports building a Mosque in the shadows of the former Twin Towers, pointing out his utter hypocrisy.

    Or maybe Olby thinks it's better to build a Mosque than to build nothing on/near the site.

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...e-harm-th.html


    I just completely ignore that guy now. He's so far left and whacked.

    Leave a comment:


  • E30 Cabrio
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    ^^^Why is this in the Prop 8 thread??
    Someone mentioned Olbermann in the thread and it got off track.

    I mentioned that Olbermann had a meltdown on the 5th anniversary of 9-11 because Bush hadn't rebuilt the site, yet Olbermann supports building a Mosque in the shadows of the former Twin Towers, pointing out his utter hypocrisy.

    Or maybe Olby thinks it's better to build a Mosque than to build nothing on/near the site.

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...e-harm-th.html

    Leave a comment:


  • E30 Cabrio
    replied
    For those of you still supporting building a Mosque in the shadows of the Twin Towers, read this:

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/a...e-harm-th.html

    Leave a comment:


  • briansjacobs
    replied
    I was wondering the same thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • joshh
    replied
    Originally posted by czag13
    What about all the male-female marriages where, for one reason or another, they are incapable of having a child? Are you saying they shouldn't be allowed to marry because they can't "actually make a family" either?


    Of course, they are male and female.

    Leave a comment:


  • czag13
    replied
    Originally posted by joshh
    And that's what happens when it goes back and forth so damned much. You are correct.
    But no that's not what I meant. I meant families that can actually make a real family.

    What about all the male-female marriages where, for one reason or another, they are incapable of having a child? Are you saying they shouldn't be allowed to marry because they can't "actually make a family" either?

    Leave a comment:

Working...