Is polygamy a protected religious right?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Massive Lee
    replied
    Originally posted by StereoInstaller1
    No, it isn't. Rastafi do not get to smoke their ganj, so no way.
    So...

    Rastafarians can't smoke weed even though their religions asks for it.
    Mormons can't have multiple wives.
    Jews, Christians and Muslims can't cut your hand if you steal from them (a religious bylaw common to all three faiths).

    What about Hassidic Jews who can't operate mechanical devices on weekends. Are they forfeited their parking tickets? Are orthodox Muslims allowed to apply Sharia outside of a Muslim country?

    What is freedom of religion if you can't practice your religion? Just trying to get into a purely rethorical debate.

    Leave a comment:


  • StereoInstaller1
    replied
    Originally posted by Massive Lee
    The principle that I was trying to raise was not necessarely about being pro or against polygamy. But instead, asking if a religious "right" is legally stronger than a civil law. Whatever the religion.
    No, it isn't. Rastafi do not get to smoke their ganj, so no way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Philo
    replied
    Originally posted by Massive Lee
    The principle that I was trying to raise was not necessarely about being pro or against polygamy. But instead, asking if a religious "right" is legally stronger than a civil law. Whatever the religion.
    Simple answer, no. The state is not religiously coordinated, although religion has influence on its members. Government is not a sanction under religious control. This is a large reason why many governments do not function efficiently.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massive Lee
    replied
    The principle that I was trying to raise was not necessarely about being pro or against polygamy. But instead, asking if a religious "right" is legally stronger than a civil law. Whatever the religion.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldsbeaker
    replied
    Noted.

    I'm too masogynistic to care about the wimmens, though.

    Originally posted by Philo
    Two things:

    1) I agree that multiple spouses creates a difficult environment for any children.

    2) Learn terms.

    Polygamy - Multiple spouses
    Polyandry - multiple husbands
    Polygyny - multiple wives

    This topic is regarding Polygyny.

    Leave a comment:


  • Philo
    replied
    Two things:

    1) I agree that multiple spouses creates a difficult environment for any children.

    2) Learn terms.

    Polygamy - Multiple spouses
    Polyandry - multiple husbands
    Polygyny - multiple wives

    This topic is regarding Polygyny.

    Leave a comment:


  • nrubenstein
    replied
    There's nothing wrong with polygamy or polyandry. There's a lot wrong with crazy people who think that abusing children is their way into heaven, however.

    Leave a comment:


  • Van Westervelt
    replied
    Originally posted by Wh33lhop
    No wives, but 5 weeks and 3 days left? ;)
    Yup, we all have our weaknesses, and mine is hot women. Sue me, judge me, I dont give a lick. lol :p

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    i don't see a problem with it... beats the hell out of have a wife and a girlfriend.

    Actually, having two girlfriends is better. than two wives. I'm on a fence here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wh33lhop
    replied
    Originally posted by Van Westervelt
    I are mormon and no wives. fml.

    The blanket statement that 'Mormons do ____ and believe ____' is reckless, irresponsible and above all incorrect. Extremists who have taken things out of context and are NOT member of the known and labeled 'Mormon' religion are the only ones committing such heinous acts.
    No wives, but 5 weeks and 3 days left? ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • Philo
    replied
    So. . . . you could theoretically have a 3(+)way every night. . . I think I know what side i'm on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Van Westervelt
    replied
    I are mormon and no wives. fml.

    The blanket statement that 'Mormons do ____ and believe ____' is reckless, irresponsible and above all incorrect. Extremists who have taken things out of context and are NOT member of the known and labeled 'Mormon' religion are the only ones committing such heinous acts.

    Leave a comment:


  • ck_taft325is
    replied
    Is it just me, or is Lee REALLY trolling hard recently?

    Leave a comment:


  • 2002maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by mar1t1me
    Fun read.
    That made me lol. It's complete rubbish btw, totally untrue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sagaris
    replied
    As a Mormon, I become quite peeved when my wives argue about what type of soup should be made for supper and squander their time. It is then and only then that I will saddle up the horse and ride to the outskirts of town for a loaf of bread.

    (If you took that seriously then your sarcasm detector just exploded)

    As far as I know , less than 5% of the church membership practiced polygamy when it was in practice. A lot of members had a hard time with it and didnt get involved with it. It all boils down to whether the prophets that were commanded to practice polygamy for a short season were true prophets of God or not. If they were true prophets then thats what God wanted at that time and that's that. If not, then perhaps Muslim extremists contain the true doctrine and the only way to get to heaven is to blow stuff up. We will all find out one day. Until then we gotta try to live and get along with eachother and avoid being blowed up.

    Leave a comment:

Working...