*the reported or diagnosed cases are a higher % of the population than earlier DIAGNOSED cases per capita*
It cannot even be said for a fact that the disease is more common today than it was before for certain. Any speculation about environment or influences is just that - speculation.
Along wth ck_taft325is comment, the statistic is meaningless - and people who suck at statistics should avoid trying to using them.
4. More children are being diagnosed with ASDs today than in the past. Some of the prevalence increase is undoubtedly attributable to changing diagnostic tendency; however, there are insufficient data to determine whether this can explain the entire increasing trend.
6. A link between environmental exposures and ASDs is plausible, but little evidence exists supporting associations between specific environmental exposures and autism.
6. A link between environmental exposures and ASDs is plausible, but little evidence exists supporting associations between specific environmental exposures and autism.
Along wth ck_taft325is comment, the statistic is meaningless - and people who suck at statistics should avoid trying to using them.






Comment