Chump for President

[Farbin Kaiber]

^I would suggest rolling the scroll wheel one more internal click followed up by not clicking on the link to this thread as the easiest method to apply to this particular situation.

[Powling]

^I would suggest rolling the scroll wheel one more internal click followed up by not clicking on the link to this thread as the easiest method to apply to this particular situation.

Damn. Was hoping there was an option somewhere that I was just not seeing.

[marshallnoise]

Subscriptions maybe?

[Massive Lee]

Thanks Hawaii ;-)
It looks like Trump got butt fucked a second time.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-revised-travel-ban-judge-hearing-236086

"The ruling is another serious blow to Trump’s attempt to limit immigration as part of what he claims is an effort to reduce the threat of terrorist attacks in the U.S."

[gwb72tii]

Thanks Hawaii ;-)
It looks like Trump got butt fucked a second time.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-revised-travel-ban-judge-hearing-236086

"The ruling is another serious blow to Trump’s attempt to limit immigration as part of what he claims is an effort to reduce the threat of terrorist attacks in the U.S."

it will be appealed and be judged to be withing the President's authority

Presidents have wide latitude to limit or prevent certain classes of immigrants

not surprising a judge in the Aloha state would rule this while at the same time the original WA state judge refused to block the order

[TimeMachinE30]

[decay]

it will be appealed and be judged to be withing the President's authority

Presidents have wide latitude to limit or prevent certain classes of immigrants

not surprising a judge in the Aloha state would rule this while at the same time the original WA state judge refused to block the order

yeah, that's called "checks and balances". it's a good idea to have more than one pair of eyes on any legislation that gets written; especially when there is a cheeto-flavored idiot in the white house.

[BraveUlysses]

lols just keep on coming

[marshallnoise]

yeah, that's called "checks and balances". it's a good idea to have more than one pair of eyes on any legislation that gets written; especially when there is a cheeto-flavored idiot in the white house.

Checks and balances are all good. Except when there is nothing to be checked. Then it's called judicial overreach. You may not like that it's legal to do what Trump wants to do, but a federal judge to stop it based on feelings is flat out wrong.

Know what you are talking about before typing decay.

[z31maniac]

Yeah, because I'm going to be upset if my cost of living goes down because I don't like who is in the WH, or who passed the law giving me a lower cost of life.

You're grasping at straws.

[BraveUlysses]

Yeah, because I'm going to be upset if my cost of living goes down because I don't like who is in the WH, or who passed the law giving me a lower cost of life.

You're grasping at straws.

I'm glad she got coverage but it's amazing to see that people can attribute something to trump that he clearly didn't actually do. Nothing has changed in the law yet.

But good job missing the point entirely, cause this person and millions of other poor people will get fucked over 100% by the new insurance bill.

[z31maniac]

[TimeMachinE30]

I'm glad she got coverage but it's amazing to see that people can attribute something to trump that he clearly didn't actually do. Nothing has changed in the law yet.

But good job missing the point entirely, cause this person and millions of other poor people will get fucked over 100% by the new insurance bill.

Only "poor" people will lose coverage?

Will you lose coverage?

Did anyone one lose coverage due to Obamacare?

[TimeMachinE30]

Checks and balances are all good. Except when there is nothing to be checked. Then it's called judicial overreach. You may not like that it's legal to do what Trump wants to do, but a federal judge to stop it based on feelings is flat out wrong.

Know what you are talking about before typing decay.

It seems their plaintiff in the case has no standing, too. He is entirely exempt from the provisions of the EO (green card for example).

Again, like it or not, look at the COTUS. There is a lot in there. We would be wise to reference it before getting too wild with feelings.

[LBJefferies]

2 pages from a decades old tax return don't amount to shit. Trump's team had to pour through what is probably thousands of pages of returns over many years to find 2 pages that make him look favorable. And we don't know why those numbers were even there.