NASA says Climate Change exagerated?

[Bill 84 318i]

Liberals are smart enough to think, but not smart enough to think for themselves.

Nothing speaks to one's intellectual ability to digest complex issues more than their incessant need to label them.

[Farbin Kaiber]

It's funny you assume well educated is akin to liberalism. Liberals are smart enough to think, but not smart enough to think for themselves.

[CorvallisBMW]

so, whats to know?
like its a secret teachers are 99.9999% liberal?

Must have something to do with being well educated.

[Farbin Kaiber]

Well, his post is in this thread, but on a different subject.

[herbivor]

here's my last post on this tired subject.

[gwb72tii]

Sleeve sure seems to know a lot about the inner workings of 99.99999999% of America's colleges for someone who's never attended even one of them.

so, whats to know?
like its a secret teachers are 99.9999% liberal?

[CorvallisBMW]

Sleeve sure seems to know a lot about the inner workings of 99.99999999% of America's colleges for someone who's never attended even one of them.

[mrsleeve]

i think mrsleeve is really jealous he never got to go to graduate from college.

lol Not at all. I do just fine for my self, with out that huge debt hanging over my head.


Sure I could have gone, with out issue, Kettering hounded me with recruitment mail for years. I am very happy and secure with my life as it is.

[Kershaw]

i think mrsleeve is really jealous he never got to go to graduate from college.

[herbivor]

^Great last post. It could've been your first post because you spent the whole thread trying to prove your point and came up short. That's ok. I enjoyed the debate. I'm sure we'll play again later.

[gwb72tii]

here's my last post on this tired subject

anyone who thinks the pro AGW scientists are pure in their intent has their head in the sand. there are huge political forces intertwined with the AGW crowd that have absolutely nothing to do with GW and have separate agendas they leverage thru GW "solutions" (think fat fuck al gore and his carbon trading scheme).

anyone who thinks the science is settled is delusional and ignorant.
herbivore and others can espose the pro AGW arguments and science, yet when equally competent atmospheric scientists refute/undermine their stated conclusions, somehow its not relevant/admissable. this is the definition of ignorance, ie to ignore.
next time you guyz accuse the skeptics of ignoring the science, look in the mirror first and practice.

[Vedubin01]

interesting topic hit the news today kinda about this subject.


Things that make you go MMMMMMmmmmmmmm.


Global Warming Link to Drowned Polar Bears Melts Under Searing Fed Probe


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45447


Biologist Charles Monnett, the lead scientist on the paper, was placed on administrative leave July 18. Fellow biologist Jeffrey Gleason, who also contributed to the study, is being questioned, but has not been suspended.

Monnett now manages $50 million in studies as part of his duties as a wildlife biologist with the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department has already declined to pursue any criminal prosecution in the probe, but the scientists still face possible administrative action for any wrongdoing, the inspector general said in the memo.

[gwb72tii]

Geez, I wish my Mrs got this nasty in the bedroom :o

now that's funny

[mrsleeve]

^

Excuse me, I was clarifying a point and an implication, and there is a reason for that stereotype. I dont really care where you went to school, all but a few have to bow to the will of the federal govt if they want the federal loan/grant kiddies to be able to continue to attend, there by getting the money from that huge section of the student population. Even Harvard compromises its principals to get the 15% of their operating budget that comes from the feds. Where much of family has attended and where I have my course work DOES NOT.

Next Your real world experience good for you, why do you still support all the things you support then??? Oh I will make connect the dots leap here, your bread and butter is climate change right???? SO you are one of the ones that is profiting on it all. Just making these assessments on the information you have let out.

Oh and that is far from my sister..............................

[herbivor]

^The slightest bit of respect I had for you Sleeve was lost with that post, but keep posting, I still enjoy seeing your sister's cleavage in your avatar. Since you guys got nothing on this debate and have resorted to projecting stereotypes, I think we've exhausted the thread. But I'll entertain your curiosity about my education and background:
I'm over 30, graduated Magna Cum Laude with a degree in engineering and minor in physics, so you can say I have an affinity towards science. I paid my way through college working construction jobs and utilizing government loans. No one paid my way unless you include my fellow North Carolinians since it was a public school. I managed a 12 person engineering firm by the time I was 24 hiring and firing people twice my age. I started my own firm 4 years ago and became a part owner in a start-up company with another fellow entrepreneur. We're doing quite well even with the recession. I also have travelled all over the world visiting the arctic a few times and seeing the impact of climate change first hand. Oh yeah and I'm also married, have 2 kids and lived all over the country because I grew up in a military family.

Is that enough "real world" experience for you or did you want to review my Curriculum Vitae as well?