When the GW nonsense blows over, the *alarmists* will claim a victory in that they helped do *enough* to make the temps cool...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NASA says Climate Change exagerated?
Collapse
X
-
Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison
"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama
-
Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber View Post^ And, since you have a job in Charlotte, NC... Most likely white.
http://blackpoliticsontheweb.com/201...nt-rate-soars/
Regarding this subject entirely, I find it ironic that when a single science research paper may sparsely support the GW skeptic's position they are ready to jump on it and say "See, the science supports my position." But then continue to refute the thousands of other science documents that contradict their position.
People see what they want to see. I would love to believe that Global Warming is just another silly natural phenomenon but there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If you can find sufficient evidence then I would gladly change my position.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by herbivor View PostHow many black hippies do you know?
Regarding this subject entirely, I find it ironic that when a single science research paper may sparsely support the GW skeptic's position they are ready to jump on it and say "See, the science supports my position." But then continue to refute the thousands of other science documents that contradict their position.
People see what they want to see. I would love to believe that Global Warming is just another silly natural phenomenon but there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If you can find sufficient evidence then I would gladly change my position.
there are plenty of scientists with a more acute understanding of the actual science than you or anyone here posses that are what you would describe as deniers. you refuse to believe them for whatever reason you have. and their opinions are not hard to find.
but you cannot discount them and say the science is settled or whatever.
there is no such thing as "settled" science.
what your side does is "alarm" as many as possible to further political goals of the left, like population control, CO2 offsets and other such crap.
and now the climate is doing something your sides infallible mathematical models did not predict - the climate has not warmed, and in many places it is cooling, like the shit up here in the PNW
thats why some of us choose not to believe, and are skeptical, of you and your sides arguments and "science".
your sides arguments are all conjecture unsupported by historical data or by their predictive power. no science has linked CO2 to causing warming. none. yet it has become your sides cause, along with fat fuck gore and his financial interests in companies related to CO2 offset trading.
open your eyes and your mind, you're being played.“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
^I would suppose by the statement you haven't read any of the links I posted which refutes nearly everything you just said in great detail with very logical data. I would also suppose by your tone that you think GW is some mass conspiracy conjured up by liberals for some mass world control. The only "alarming" part in the GW debate is the fact that all of this evidence is pouring in and a large portion of the common public refuse to accept it. If it looks like a duck and quack likes a duck, guess what? It's probably a fucking duck, not a zebra conspiring to look like a duck.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryann View PostWhy does the media regularly present human-caused global warming as proven science rather than the hypothesis it is? Why do our politicians write economy crippling legislation in the name of human-caused global warming?
Because liberals are as money driven as Republicans.Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison
"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama
Comment
-
Originally posted by joshh View PostBecause liberals are as money driven as Republicans.
Originally posted by veggie guy^I would suppose by the statement you haven't read any of the links I posted which refutes nearly everything you just said in great detail with very logical data. I would also suppose by your tone that you think GW is some mass conspiracy conjured up by liberalsOriginally posted by FusionIf a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
William Pitt-
Comment
-
Originally posted by mrsleeve View Postmore so, just so long as is someone elses money
I read a fair share of them and like I said before, your links rebuttles are nothing more than grade school play ground Nuhhh Uhhhh, its cuz I saz its that waz...sigpic
Comment
-
herbie, this is too easy
i'll give you reference to one scientist and you can go from there if you're open minded
oh, and BTW
scientists get their funding for research from a variety of sources, public and private, neither of which disqualifies the science
you can't say, "oh, he's partially funded by exxon mobile and is biased" and not hold the same opinion of gov't sponsored scientists“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Ah yes Dick Lindzen. The only scientist with a "reputable" background that the skeptics love to site. Unfortunately you forgot to mention that Dick's predictions he made back in the 80's regarding temperature rise was way off whereas the models he loves to critisize were far more accurate. Your link was not new to me or useful in any way. But thanks for the effort.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by joshh View PostWhen the GW nonsense blows over, the *alarmists* will claim a victory in that they helped do *enough* to make the temps cool...
Maybe then we'll get free gas to warm this shit up again.
Fighting over a damn microwavable dinner temperature.
Comment
-
"Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
John F. Kennedy
Comment
Comment