Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Election 2012: More of the same

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
    #1

    Election 2012: More of the same

    I can't believe that in 1 years time we are going to be going through this same bullshit process yet again. The supreme court recently removed the limit on campaign contributions effectively making it legal to buy off politicians. These assholes spend all of their time, before AND after getting elected, at 30 thousand dollar a plate fundraiser dinners, and applying make up for their next "debate" if you want to even call it that. Their entire terms in office are spent campaigning and sucking corporate cock and not a damn thing of value actually gets accomplished. These fucking pieces of shit are bought and sold by the highest bidder and we make it possible because we continue to give our money to shitty corporations and cast our vote for "the lesser of two evils" instead of for the right man (or woman). If Ron Paul doesn't get the GOP nomination then I am not voting and the little money that I do have will stay right where it is in my low yield credit union savings account because I am not going to continue supporting the assholes with all the money and all the political power.

    Basically, if everybody is so fed up then why are we going to allow ourselves to continue with this farce that is a Presidential election?
    Tags: None
    #2
    I never give a dime to ANY politician and never have. And never intend to.

    What's even worse are those Americans that still believe the utter BS that comes out of Obama's pie hole even when he's a corporate cock sucker worse than the rest to date. Yet these people actually think he gives a fuck about them.

    I know the people I'm not voting for so far.
    Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

    "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

    ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by joshh View Post
      I never give a dime to ANY politician and never have. And never intend to.

      What's even worse are those Americans that still believe the utter BS that comes out of Obama's pie hole even when he's a corporate cock sucker worse than the rest to date. Yet these people actually think he gives a fuck about them.

      I know the people I'm not voting for so far.
      Originally posted by Isthmus
      lol shut up. reagan bush and bush sr were sucking the corp cock till white shit came out.


      Pay attention kiddie.
      Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

      "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

      ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

      Comment

        #4
        i think he's trying to point out the difference between a corporate cock sucker and a corporate gang bangee like bush sr or reagan.
        AWD > RWD

        Comment

          #5
          yes and where do you think we would be exactly if we continued on with Carter/Clinton/Obunghole style policy the last 30 fucking years ????
          Last edited by mrsleeve; 10-20-2011, 11:04 AM.
          Originally posted by Fusion
          If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
          The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


          The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

          Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
          William Pitt-

          Comment

            #6
            my bet is we would have continued clinton's surplus.
            AWD > RWD

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Kershaw View Post
              my bet is we would have continued clinton's surplus.
              Clinton would not have had a surplus with out Regan and Bush 41. You were not alive and I was just a baby at the end of the carter years. Why dont you look those up and see what things were like then???
              Originally posted by Fusion
              If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
              The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


              The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

              Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
              William Pitt-

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by mrsleeve View Post
                Clinton would not have had a surplus with out Regan and Bush 41. You were not alive and I was just a baby at the end of the carter years. Why dont you look those up and see what things were like then???


                Or his Republican controlled Congress.
                Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

                ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                Comment

                  #9
                  So don't vote for either a republican or democrat. Vote for a third party candidate or independent. I will be and have in the past. I haven't decided who yet this year but it for sure won't be either a republican or democrat.

                  And don't give me the BS "You're just wasting your vote cause they're not gonna win." We will always be stuck with dem/rep parties if everyone keeps having this attitude and still voting for them.
                  A lot of states, mine for example have voted one party for the past 2 decades or more and are never even close. So to me you're "wasting your vote" more by voting for either dem/rep parties. Every vote for a third party counts, and counts moreso in terms of your vote out of the total votes for them, and getting them noticed, and the change you're contributing to.
                  Zinno '89 <24v swap in progress>

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by joshh View Post
                    Or his Republican controlled Congress.
                    truth
                    the only reason we had a surplus is clinton hadhis ass handed to him in the mid-term elections and that changed his approach. he agreed with, insted of fought, the republican controlled congress that refused to spend money (gingrich)
                    “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
                    Sir Winston Churchill

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Originally posted by gwb72tii View Post
                      truth
                      the only reason we had a surplus is clinton hadhis ass handed to him in the mid-term elections and that changed his approach. he agreed with, insted of fought, the republican controlled congress that refused to spend money (gingrich)
                      Yeah. It had nothing to do with the Internet technology boom. Also known as the tech bubble. It was all the GOP's wise decisions.
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                        #12
                        the socialist is now crediting the free market :crazy:
                        Originally posted by Fusion
                        If a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
                        The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money. -Alexis de Tocqueville


                        The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken

                        Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
                        William Pitt-

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Originally posted by mrsleeve View Post
                          the socialist is now crediting the free market :crazy:
                          Yes. The free market that boomed because of a government investment in developing the Internet.
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                            #14
                            LOL, the idea that the ruling on corporate contributions really makes a damned bit of difference. Between HNW individuals and "bundlers" there isnt a change that will take place. It was just a "fire and brimstone" given by the Dems to claim it was going to give the Pubs unlimited funds.

                            In reality there is one candidate with a clear lead over all, Obama. His entire campaign effort has nearly 5x more than all of the Pubs combined.
                            Im now E30less.
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Originally posted by gwb72tii View Post
                              truth
                              the only reason we had a surplus is clinton hadhis ass handed to him in the mid-term elections and that changed his approach. he agreed with, insted of fought, the republican controlled congress that refused to spend money (gingrich)
                              So why didn't we have a MASSIVE surplus during GWB and the 6 years of republican controlled congress from 2000-2006? lol...

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                              Working...
                              X