Originally posted by CorvallisBMW
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Global Warming is over.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by FusionIf a car is the epitome of freedom, than an electric car is house arrest with your wife titty fucking your next door neighbor.
The Desire to Save Humanity is Always a False Front for the Urge to Rule it- H. L. Mencken
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.
William Pitt-
-
you may not like the source, and frankly i don't care, but the data is what feeds the IPCC and others
selected quotes
RSS
The slope is flat since January 1997 or 16 years and 1 month. (goes to January) RSS is 193/204 or 94.6% of the way to Ben Santer’s 17 years.
For RSS the warming is not significant for over 23 years.
UAH
The slope is flat since July 2008 or 4 years, 7 months. (goes to January)
For UAH, the warming is not significant for over 19 years.
Hadcrut4
The slope is flat since November 2000 or 12 years, 3 months. (goes to January.)
For Hadcrut4, the warming is not significant for over 18 years.
Hadcrut3
The slope is flat since March 1997 or 15 years, 11 months (goes to January)
For Hadcrut3, the warming is not significant for over 19 years.
Hadsst2
The slope is flat since March 1997 or 15 years, 11 months. (goes to January)
GISS
The slope is flat since May 2001 or 11 years, 9 months. (goes to January)
For GISS, the warming is not significant for over 17 years.
Conclusion
Above, various facts have been presented along with sources from where all facts were obtained. Keep in mind that no one is entitled to their facts. It is only in the interpretation of the facts for which legitimate discussions can take place. After looking at the above facts, do you feel that we should spend billions to prevent catastrophic warming?
Guest Post By Werner Brozek, Edited By Just The Facts In order to answer the question in the title, we need to know what time period is a reasonable period to take into consideration. As well, we n…
The new data confirms the existence of a pause in global warming,’ Professor Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Science at America’s Georgia Tech university, told me yesterday.
Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, who found himself at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ scandal over leaked emails three years ago, would not normally be expected to agree with her. Yet on two important points, he did.
The data does suggest a plateau, he admitted, and without a major El Nino event – the sudden, dramatic warming of the southern Pacific which takes place unpredictably and always has a huge effect on global weather – ‘it could go on for a while’.
New global temperature trend data released by the Hadley Centre and the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) in Britain find essentially...
haha at least cale admits to being a denier“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
giggles
Climate change researcher James Hansen, the long-time head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, is retiring from government employment to campaign for policies that he believes must be adopted to avoid impending catastrophic global warming.
...
More recently, Hansen has admitted that increases in global average temperatures have been halted for the last sixteen years. He argues that the rise must resume, but we shall see. In the meantime, other climate researchers are suggesting that the sensitivity of the climate to loading up the atmosphere with more carbon dioxide is somewhat less than many climate models have assumed.
Comment
-
gwb again with his repetition of the dumb claim that global warming has stopped because of an outlier used as the starting point. Regardless of how many times we say why it's a broken argument, he forgets and simply reposts it again.
Originally posted by rwh11385 View PostOnly if you are dumb and choose an outlier as the division.
But the creator probably knew exactly what he was doing, since the standards of the skeptics are pretty low - they'll eat up anything that tells them what they want to hear.
Shift it from '83 to '98 and '99 to 2012, or from 83 to 96 and 4/97 to 2012, and you'll see the honest trend and not just some cherry picked stupidity for those who don't know any better and are suckers for BS.
And neither gwb nor fusion seem to want to answer this:
Originally posted by rwh11385 View PostSerious and basic question here Pavel [and George] - for what rationale do you reject completely the notion of global warming / climate change? Which portion of it do you find false or wrong? That GHGs don't impact how the atmosphere absorbs energy? Or that you assume that energy disappears or can be destroyed? Or that mysteriously all additional energy escapes the planet without finding a planetary heat sink?
It'd be one thing if you or any other denier present an alternate possibility of what happens to the energy / heat that comes as a result of GHGs - but mostly all you seem to do is attack science while providing nothing more than ignoring reality. If anything, denial based on nothing is much more of a religion than the understanding of science and concepts that support an explanation of natural phenomenon.Last edited by rwh11385; 04-04-2013, 09:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fusion View PostSo GWB, me and a NASA scientist are wrong?
Yeah. Try actually reading what he says as opposed to what other people summarize simply.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MF DOOM View PostJust answer the question, please. Do you believe in god?Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries
www.gutenparts.com
One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!
Comment
-
what it all apparently means is this rwh
CO2 is apparently not THE driver of global warming, that man's understanding of climate is insufficient to explain cause and effect of anthro souces of GHG, that previous predictions of gloom and doom are wrong“There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
Sir Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Originally posted by MF DOOM View PostJust answer the question, please. Do you believe in god?
Comment
Comment