It’s not clear that private equity—like other forms of financial innovation—is good for America. You’d think that if private equity made businesses more efficient and valuable overall, there’d be clear evidence to support it, but there isn’t. Private equity firms earn most of their money through financial engineering. A big share of their returns comes from “tax arbitrage”—figuring out how to exploit loopholes to pay less to the government. Because interest is a deductible business expense, debt financing means they often pay little or no corporate tax. Private equity’s reliance on leverage can also magnify short-term earnings without leaving the companies they manage more valuable overall. One legal but dubious practice that private equity firms engage in is paying large “special dividends” out of borrowed money. As Jim Surowiecki of the New Yorker has written, “These dividends created no economic value—they just redistributed money from the company to the private-equity investors.” There’s some anecdotal evidence that the well-regarded Bain has been a better owner than most. But there’s no real way to evaluate that either.
While it appears that private equity may benefit some companies, this does not mean they always add value to them. Instead, private equity firms may make their riches by taking advantage of other debt holders, benefiting from tax arbitrage or firing employees. Evidence from the 1980s shows that private equity often took advantage of other debt holders.
and good job, his first venture was a success story? i guess that somehow determines that he is not a corporate pirate for the rest of his career.

Leave a comment: