That is true, but how many absurd conspiracy theories get thrown out because they never move past the stage of relying on thin circumstantial evidence? While you may not demand actual evidence when forming your opinions, I do.
For that to be the case the circumstantial evidence must be both overwhelming and inexplicable beyond reasonable doubt. Clinton missing a hearing is about the farthest thing from that.
Even with enough circumstantial evidence you can make a successful murder case and send a man to prison for the rest of their lives too.


Comment