Benghazi-Gate?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Well the wheels of justice do indeed turn slowly. Perhaps, although I doubt, the perps will be brought to justice:

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Srsly, stop

    Leave a comment:


  • profbooty
    replied
    Originally posted by einhander
    Shutup
    That is a rather eloquent and persuasive response.

    If you don't think that the conspiracy theorists were right, you would have pointed out that the republicans would have every incentive to be investigating this point rather than playing the blame game for the past 19 months and 8 or 9 investigations. Perhaps you didn't live through the media circus in the 80's?

    I tend to think if the Syria arms angle had merit, it would have already come out, though it still doesn't answer the main question, "Why the heck was Chris Stevens there?" and only adds red meat for the right to stew upon.

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    Originally posted by profbooty
    I find it funny how no one has ever really explained why the US ambassador needed to meet with the Turkish ambassador at a CIA outpost 500 miles away from the consulate.

    The only talk about that was been "conspiracy" theories about weapons sales to Syrian rebels. If it were true, that would seem to be a far more "juicy" story like Iran-Contra back in the 80's and a more interesting campaign story for the republicans.
    Shutup

    Leave a comment:


  • profbooty
    replied
    I find it funny how no one has ever really explained why the US ambassador needed to meet with the Turkish ambassador at a CIA outpost 500 miles away from the consulate.

    The only talk about that was been "conspiracy" theories about weapons sales to Syrian rebels. If it were true, that would seem to be a far more "juicy" story like Iran-Contra back in the 80's and a more interesting campaign story for the republicans.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber
    I can't imagine how much tofu and soy milk Brave consumes. Please post pics of your vegan approved e30 Sport interior with sustainable faux leather shifter boot.


    /gross generalization
    Ugh, get it right, it's tofu skin upholstery!

    Leave a comment:


  • einhander
    replied
    I hate tofu. It's my least favorite.

    Leave a comment:


  • Farbin Kaiber
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses

    Keep sucking Darrell Issa's cock, you seemed to have missed a few drops.

    I can't imagine how much tofu and soy milk Brave consumes. Please post pics of your vegan approved e30 Sport interior with sustainable faux leather shifter boot.


    /gross generalization

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    its no so much the fact that it happened, or that more occurred during the previous admin that people are pissed off about.

    Its all the lying and misdirection about WHY it happened is the big deal. Not to mention WHY SF units that were on the tarmac waiting for wheels up, WERE ORDERED TO STAND DOWN when they still could have arrived in time to offer assistance when it was needed most. this is the concept that the liberal mind cant seem to get its head wrapped around, and solidifies the fantasy land you seem to live in, inside of your own wishful thinking
    11 benghazis under one president, no fucks given. one happens during a president you don't like? must be a conspiracy!



    A report by Republicans on the Armed Services Committee recently declared: “There was no ‘stand down’ order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi.” A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report released in January said: “The Committee has reviewed the allegations that U.S. personnel, including in the IC [Intelligence Community] or DOD, prevented the mounting of any military relief effort during the attacks, but the Committee has not found any of these allegations to be substantiated.”
    This is a great example of you repeating more bullshit without fucking educating yourself first.

    Although, you're not creative enough to actually come up with this stuff, so nice job being the sycophant.

    Keep sucking Darrell Issa's cock, you seemed to have missed a few drops.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    its no so much the fact that it happened, or that more occurred during the previous admin that people are pissed off about.

    Its all the lying and misdirection about WHY it happened is the big deal. Not to mention WHY SF units that were on the tarmac waiting for wheels up, WERE ORDERED TO STAND DOWN when they still could have arrived in time to offer assistance when it was needed most. this is the concept that the liberal mind cant seem to get its head wrapped around, and solidifies the fantasy land you seem to live in, inside of your own wishful thinking
    Last edited by mrsleeve; 05-12-2014, 08:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber
    Love it, instead of being appalled it happened, like a little kid, you go and try to tattle-tale on what the older brother did before to take focus off oneself. It's still an atrocity either way, but I'd like to see an infographic of the Democratic response mirrored in that image. I'm sure the Democrats were complaining when Bush was in office, right?
    Tattling? Look it's awfully funny the GOP is obsessed with this story and gave not a single fuck about any of the serious security failures that seemed to happen in a particular 8 year stretch.

    This is pure politics and none of the politicians investigating this incident actually gives a shit that it happened (pretty sure you don't either).

    Leave a comment:


  • cunninglinguist
    replied
    Which president vacationed his way through 52 separate warnings about 9/11 (you know, the attack that happened on US soil and killed 3000 people)?

    Who can ever forget the rhetoric of the right after this event: "nobody has attacked us since 9/11. Therefore Bush has kept us SAFE!"

    After the barn has burned down, no further horses were killed inside the barn. This absolutely crystallizes the idiocy that is the conservative mind.

    Meanwhile, the "Islamic" Obama has hunted down and killed the perpetrator of that attack. Which president has kept us "safe" now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Farbin Kaiber
    replied
    Love it, instead of being appalled it happened, like a little kid, you go and try to tattle-tale on what the older brother did before to take focus off oneself. It's still an atrocity either way, but I'd like to see an infographic of the Democratic response mirrored in that image. I'm sure the Democrats were complaining when Bush was in office, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • freeride53
    replied
    ^ This. Some of these politicians' ignorance is appalling.

    Leave a comment:


  • kickinindian
    replied
    Originally posted by braveulysses


    wonder why they suddenly give a flying fuck? Cause nobody gave a shit the last 11 times.

    thank you!!!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...