Government Dependence

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gwb72tii
    No R3VLimiter
    • Nov 2005
    • 3864

    #121
    dude, you are unable to post intellectual rebuttals to arguments here on this board without insults. so jump in a lake, eh?
    its funny really coming from you of all people on this board, at least you and your twin brave
    “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
    Sir Winston Churchill

    Comment

    • rwh11385
      lance_entities
      • Oct 2003
      • 18403

      #122
      Originally posted by gwb72tii
      dude, you are unable to post intellectual rebuttals to arguments here on this board without insults. so jump in a lake, eh?
      its funny really coming from you of all people on this board, at least you and your twin brave
      Sorry you perceive calling out fallacious claims as insulting. Perhaps try making any intellectual rebuttals period instead of just throwing up ignorant opinion and people might take you for more than a troll.

      Comment

      • Kershaw
        R3V OG
        • Feb 2010
        • 11822

        #123
        Originally posted by gwb72tii
        dude, you are unable to post intellectual rebuttals to arguments here on this board without insults.
        Wow. I just face palmed so hard I broke my own nose.
        AWD > RWD

        Comment

        • BraveUlysses
          No R3VLimiter
          • Jun 2007
          • 3781

          #124
          angry, impotent old man ruins internet thread: highlights at 11.

          Comment

          • tjts1
            E30 Mastermind
            • May 2007
            • 1851

            #125
            Originally posted by gwb72tii
            dude, you are unable to post intellectual rebuttals to arguments here on this board without insults. so jump in a lake, eh?
            its funny really coming from you of all people on this board, at least you and your twin brave

            Comment

            • gwb72tii
              No R3VLimiter
              • Nov 2005
              • 3864

              #126
              Originally posted by Kershaw
              Wow. I just face palmed so hard I broke my own nose.
              pics or it didn't happen
              “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
              Sir Winston Churchill

              Comment

              • rwh11385
                lance_entities
                • Oct 2003
                • 18403

                #127
                Originally posted by rwh11385
                But unlike what a lot of Republicans said, it wasn't the end to manned spaceflight but rather a focus on growing commercial abilities. Shouldn't competition and private industry be seen fondly??




                A group of space veterans and big-name backers today took the wraps off the Golden Spike Company, a commercial space venture that aims to send paying passengers to the moon and back at an estimated price of $1.4 billion or more for two.

                The venture would rely on private funding, and it's not clear when the first lunar flight would be launched — but the concept received a vote of support from NASA, which abandoned its own back-to-the-moon plan three and a half years ago.
                "We’re not just about America going back to the moon; we’re about American industry and American entrepreneurial spirit leading the rest of the world to an exciting era of human lunar exploration," Stern said in the venture's first news release. "It’s the 21st century, we’re here to help countries, companies, and individuals extend their reach in space, and we think we’ll see an enthusiastic customer manifest developing.”
                Stern said Golden Spike's mission architecture has been in development for two years. Each expedition would involve two sets of two launches: The first set would put the pieces in place to pre-position a lander in lunar orbit, and the second set would deliver a two-person crew to hook up with the lander, head down to the lunar surface, return to lunar orbit and then sail home in a return capsule.
                NASA's associate administrator for communications, David Weaver, issued a statement that portrayed the venture in a positive light while steering clear of a formal endorsement.

                "This type of private-sector effort is further evidence of the timeliness and wisdom of the Obama administration's overall space policy— to create an environment where commercial space companies can build upon NASA’s past successes, allowing the agency to focus on the new challenges of sending humans to an asteroid and eventually Mars," Weaver said. "As the private sector works to develop human missions to the International Space Station and eventually the moon, NASA will continue to develop new technologies and capabilities to advance the frontier ever further into space."
                Oh, the woe of America's developing private space race and the government focusing on technology and research instead of repeating history.

                Comment

                Working...