Hillary Sucks.

[marshallnoise]

Or maybe they're terrified that a populist authoritarian has taken the GOP train off the rails and has a shot at the presidency, something that they didn't think was possible last year. You shouldn't draw wide conclusions from anecdotal experiences.



The people who worry about that shit are the racists and bigots who are too weak to stand up and take the shitstorm that comes from being an outspoken racist or bigot. Remember who's running on the platform of "anti-political correctness."



everyone likes the fantasy of imprisoning political opponents.

I have attached a picture of where Bothell, WA is so anyone can run as far from you as possible if they find themselves in the area. You are certifiable. Really.

[marshallnoise]

You do realize that this is the USA, and not some place that has just one system of justice for everyone right? Further, the head of the FBI, a lifelong Republican said that she should not be prosecuted, so why (with all of the knowledge of the situation that we do not have) would you want her to be tried?

Hold on a minute here. What the fuck are the point of laws if they aren't to show the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behavior? The law is supposed to be applied equally. I don't give a crap that a Republican said that we shouldn't prosecute or not, she violated laws. Laws that lesser people would have gone to jail over and probably have already.

They are not a finer form of clay than us and as such, they should be held to the same standard as everyone else.

[BraveUlysses]

This is what gets me every time.

May not be in the circle you run with, but for me - many of the people around me who are now fully supporting Hillary are the same people who just a year ago were complaining about career politicians and how we need to get them out of office. They wanted to rid the system of them entirely and have an outsider elected for the President.

Like I said, your results may vary, but those here who have flip flopped like this truly have shown how much they are just swayed by the whole group think mentality. They are more worried about being thought of as an outside or non-conformist then to take a chance and get some real change done.

Or maybe they're terrified that a populist authoritarian has taken the GOP train off the rails and has a shot at the presidency, something that they didn't think was possible last year. You shouldn't draw wide conclusions from anecdotal experiences.

They are so worried about the threat of being called a racist or anti-feminist or anti-transgender, or what ever hot button derogatory name is in the news this week, that they will always go with the "safe" candidate. And lately, that has been the Dem's.

The people who worry about that shit are the racists and bigots who are too weak to stand up and take the shitstorm that comes from being an outspoken racist or bigot. Remember who's running on the platform of "anti-political correctness."

Everyone should be in jail, that would fix it. Just be sure that the last one in throws the keys far enough away.

You do realize that this is the USA, and not some place that has just one system of justice for everyone right? Further, the head of the FBI, a lifelong Republican said that she should not be prosecuted, so why (with all of the knowledge of the situation that we do not have) would you want her to be tried?

everyone likes the fantasy of imprisoning political opponents.

[roguetoaster]

This is what gets me every time.

That's the whole theory of why we need an electoral college, so that in theory, an unfit candidate can win popular support but not be elected.

Just look at how voting rights were first dispensed, only to those the framers thought most capable of making an informed decision. Granted, they may have been operating under the influence of various biases/popular feeling of the time, but in some ways they may have been correct.

What I don't fully understand is that people of today should be as capable, if not more considering near universal primary education, of making a fair and balanced decision (and listening to all sides of an argument), but that does not seem to be the case.

Maybe it's just a case of widespread frustration with political and societal goings on that's led people to latch on to one of two extremes in hopes of that side being the solution to the current national problems.

She should be in jail just like anyone else would be.

Everyone should be in jail, that would fix it. Just be sure that the last one in throws the keys far enough away.

You do realize that this is the USA, and not some place that has just one system of justice for everyone right? Further, the head of the FBI, a lifelong Republican said that she should not be prosecuted, so why (with all of the knowledge of the situation that we do not have) would you want her to be tried?

[marshallnoise]

I don't think public service is public service. If she was a volunteer firefighter, I would have a different opinion. Public service is public extortion and that's some bullshit.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[djjerme]

Everyone needs to keep in mind that we are comparing someone who has devoted her life to political work as opposed to a private citizen

This is what gets me every time.

May not be in the circle you run with, but for me - many of the people around me who are now fully supporting Hillary are the same people who just a year ago were complaining about career politicians and how we need to get them out of office. They wanted to rid the system of them entirely and have an outsider elected for the President.

Like I said, your results may vary, but those here who have flip flopped like this truly have shown how much they are just swayed by the whole group think mentality. They are more worried about being thought of as an outside or non-conformist then to take a chance and get some real change done.

They are so worried about the threat of being called a racist or anti-feminist or anti-transgender, or what ever hot button derogatory name is in the news this week, that they will always go with the "safe" candidate. And lately, that has been the Dem's.

In the 50's it was the Rep, so times do change, but in the end the masses are the same.

But then again. There is a lot of angry people in America. Sometimes, that can be a good thing in encouraging change.

[GG///M3]

She should be in jail just like anyone else would be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dozyproductions]

Of course it requires a conviction, which is why I asked you to clarify. She's still eligible, unfortunately.

Got ya. On a similar note, I hate our justice system! :hitler:

[GG///M3]

That's hilarious. But it isn't real, is it?

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

Not sure, but it's awesome either way


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[marshallnoise]

That's hilarious. But it isn't real, is it?

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[GG///M3]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BraveUlysses]

18 U.S. Code § 2071



This holds a candidate ineligible for president IF convicted and that's the caveat.

Of course it requires a conviction, which is why I asked you to clarify. She's still eligible, unfortunately.

[Dozyproductions]

wow. that is really....prophetic. i'm indeed very impressed.

Hilary is still a skanky K.u.n.t turned inside out by a shit dick. i don't have much better to say about the asshole candidate #2 either.


so, i guess as you were saying above, they are about even in my book too.

The dude inflates the head on his shoulders a little bit.

[Dozyproductions]

18 U.S. Code § 2071

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States

This holds a candidate ineligible for president IF convicted and that's the caveat.

[BraveUlysses]

Besides, by law she isn't allowed to be president. By law. She get's a free pass and that doesn't just come because of the positions she's held.

By which law?