Hillary Sucks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    I like how a few posts back you point out "ad hominem" and then you make some weird claim that I'm being emotional because I don't agree with your fool of a candidate, and that I must have ovaries or that it's because I'm from a specific state.
    But I am being goofy, not actually trying to make a serious comment. While your attack was trying to be serious.

    I am not making a claim about your being emotional; I am observing that. The WA comment was because similar opinions are coming out of cities that start with B and are located in the state of WA. Again, being overly stupid.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    dont let him troll you

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    I like how a few posts back you point out "ad hominem" and then you make some weird claim that I'm being emotional because I don't agree with your fool of a candidate, and that I must have ovaries or that it's because I'm from a specific state.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    I don't even? What?
    Maybe its the state of Washington. I don't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by marshallnoise
    You are hyper-emotional. You fly off the handle and make wild accusations based on emotion rather than fact. If I didn't know any better, I would figure you for having a set of ovaries. And if so, that'd be just fine with me. But it sure would explain a lot.
    I don't even? What?

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    It's not hard. It's just that nobody really cares - except you, and people like you, who really, really, really get upset when 1 out of 100,000 people doesn't conform to your definition of a person.
    really the only people who do care about this, more than others, are democrats because clinton and her merry band of followers believe it to be a wedge issue the will somehow drive votes away from republicans. at the end of the day clinton doesn't give a shit about the LBGTFYREN (insert your letter here) community for anything except their votes

    its the same old story. divide america by social status, gender, race etc and then pander to each group. vote for me, i will make sure you get's what's fair.

    its sick. whatever happened to the essence of the usa, that we are a melting pot of cultures, that being different is to be embraced but your an american first and foremost?

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    This is true but at least we're looking at a republican house and senate that would be able to stop her from accomplishing anything for 4 years. Hopefully in that time the GOP can find an adult to run for the presidency.
    If that was only true. The problem with all presidents is Executive Orders. Both parties are guilty there and it is a real problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by EyExR
    30 pages later Hillary still sucks
    This is true but at least we're looking at a republican house and senate that would be able to stop her from accomplishing anything for 4 years. Hopefully in that time the GOP can find an adult to run for the presidency.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    That's not even the question. It's of who sucks less, for sure, and one person seems hellbent on proving they are the best at it. :p
    Its not Hillary, that's for sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    You may not personally be, but your party platform specifically targets these people. are you denying that there is a large portion of the GOP who wishes they simply didn't exist? That they are going to hell / less than human, just for being who they are?

    yes, oh so emotional.. :|
    There is the broad brush again! Are you a house painter by chance?



    Try as I might, I couldn't find transgender or LGBT in there. Under traditional marriage, there is mention of allowing states to make the decision and have it not be a federal issue.

    I didn't see that the Republican Party was targeting transgenders or LGBT as non-humans, sub-humans, or anything similar to that. Strange.

    And yes, I deny that Republicans, as a whole, want transgenders or LGBT to be wiped from the planet. Their religious beliefs do not prohibit transgenders or LGBT folks from existing either.

    You are hyper-emotional. You fly off the handle and make wild accusations based on emotion rather than fact. If I didn't know any better, I would figure you for having a set of ovaries. And if so, that'd be just fine with me. But it sure would explain a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by EyExR
    30 pages later Hillary still sucks
    That's not even the question. It's of who sucks less, for sure, and one person seems hellbent on proving they are the best at it. :p

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    You may not personally be, but your party platform specifically targets these people. are you denying that there is a large portion of the GOP who wishes they simply didn't exist? That they are going to hell / less than human, just for being who they are?

    yes, oh so emotional.. :|

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    It's not hard. It's just that nobody really cares - except you, and people like you, who really, really, really get upset when 1 out of 100,000 people doesn't conform to your definition of a person.
    Why do you think I am denying their personhood?

    You are an emotional fella, aren't you?

    Leave a comment:


  • EyExR
    replied
    30 pages later Hillary still sucks

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    It's not hard. It's just that nobody really cares - except you, and people like you, who really, really, really get upset when 1 out of 100,000 people doesn't conform to your definition of a person.

    Leave a comment:

Working...