Hillary Sucks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • djjerme
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    If the same thing had happened to Hilary


    A photograph of Hillary Clinton being kissed by former Senator Robert Byrd has been widely circulated as a political statement.


    *Waits for usual "But that was way back when/in the past..etc" excuse that one side is allowed to use but not the other.

    Action speak louder than words.

    Hillary's ACTION's vs Trump (or anyone for that matters) WORD'S.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    because the reality is, Johnson isn't even going to poll 10%. And I don't like him as a candidate anyway. Jill Stein is not somebody I could vote for either. So that leaves a choice of Trump, or anyone but Trump.

    Leave a comment:


  • Schnitzer318is
    replied
    Originally posted by M-technik-3
    Making a choice from these two horrible candidates is tough. It's too bad that our country did not have some other legitimate candidates.
    Agreed. Though I will be voting for someone other than the Greedy Clinton or the Narcissistic Trump. Currently it's looking like Johnson, though I would rather see Clinton in office than Trump just for the sake of not wanting Idiocracy to be a real thing.

    Both of these candidates think 100% about themselves... as do most politicians these days unfortunately. I don't understand how the Hillary supporters and Trump supporters go at each other saying essentially the same thing about the other without realizing they are both right and they need to vote for someone else.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    I don't disagree. And I can understand some people could not vote for Hilary just like I could never vote for Trump. But hell, I've changed my mind on 3rd party votes - that would be far better than a vote for Trump (or Hilary if she bothers you that much).

    it's encouraging that there are those in the R party willing to stand up to him, but far to few.

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    Making a choice from these two horrible candidates is tough. It's too bad that our country did not have some other legitimate candidates.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by marshallnoise
    Republicans didn't build the projects. Democrats did. And the projects are racist to the core.

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
    OK? What does that have to do with Trump not being uncomfortable with an endorsement by David Duke?

    If the same thing had happened to Hilary, and Hilary had a pattern of posting images found on white supremacist websites, I wouldn't be sitting here arguing that "well, the republicans are more racist so nya nya nya!". I'd be looking for somebody else to vote for. It has nothing to do with the candidate, who is hardly a Republican anyway (but it sure has been a useful vehicle to get him close to election).

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    Did you plug your ears while he was talking, because what he said was definitely not in support of the Khan family.
    You don't have to support the whole fucking family, do you? Such a weird religion, liberalism.

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by marshallnoise
    Look, Khan wasn't even criticised for being a war hero; his Islamic fascist parents were criticised. It's not the same thing as disrespecting a war hero, not even remotely close.

    Everyone on the left or attached to the left is off limits because of association alone, I get it.

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
    Did you plug your ears while he was talking, because what he said was definitely not in support of the Khan family.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    sure, before the civil rights movement and the parties basically switched - with the Republicans taking over for the racist democrats in the south. Such a tired argument. You may as well be comparing the Wig party of the 1700's.
    Republicans didn't build the projects. Democrats did. And the projects are racist to the core.

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by gwb72tii
    muslim is not a race lol
    sorry, what would you like me to call them? The intent is the same, the label doesn't make any difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Look, Khan wasn't even criticised for being a war hero; his Islamic fascist parents were criticised. It's not the same thing as disrespecting a war hero, not even remotely close.

    Everyone on the left or attached to the left is off limits because of association alone, I get it.

    Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    sure, before the civil rights movement and the parties basically switched - with the Republicans taking over for the racist democrats in the south. Such a tired argument. You may as well be comparing the Wig party of the 1700's.

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    lol. Accusing him? He proves it time and time again. Again, how long would it have taken you to disavow support from the KKK? Would you even have to give it a second thought? I wouldn't think so.

    maybe he thinks judges shouldn't be hispanic or muslim. But that's not racist at all. right?
    muslim is not a race lol

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    interesting you'd also bring up the KKK, an org that was part of the democrat establishment

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    lol. Accusing him? He proves it time and time again. Again, how long would it have taken you to disavow support from the KKK? Would you even have to give it a second thought? I wouldn't think so.

    maybe he thinks judges shouldn't be hispanic or muslim. But that's not racist at all. right?

    Leave a comment:

Working...