If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
because the reality is, Johnson isn't even going to poll 10%. And I don't like him as a candidate anyway. Jill Stein is not somebody I could vote for either. So that leaves a choice of Trump, or anyone but Trump.
Making a choice from these two horrible candidates is tough. It's too bad that our country did not have some other legitimate candidates.
Agreed. Though I will be voting for someone other than the Greedy Clinton or the Narcissistic Trump. Currently it's looking like Johnson, though I would rather see Clinton in office than Trump just for the sake of not wanting Idiocracy to be a real thing.
Both of these candidates think 100% about themselves... as do most politicians these days unfortunately. I don't understand how the Hillary supporters and Trump supporters go at each other saying essentially the same thing about the other without realizing they are both right and they need to vote for someone else.
I don't disagree. And I can understand some people could not vote for Hilary just like I could never vote for Trump. But hell, I've changed my mind on 3rd party votes - that would be far better than a vote for Trump (or Hilary if she bothers you that much).
it's encouraging that there are those in the R party willing to stand up to him, but far to few.
Republicans didn't build the projects. Democrats did. And the projects are racist to the core.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
OK? What does that have to do with Trump not being uncomfortable with an endorsement by David Duke?
If the same thing had happened to Hilary, and Hilary had a pattern of posting images found on white supremacist websites, I wouldn't be sitting here arguing that "well, the republicans are more racist so nya nya nya!". I'd be looking for somebody else to vote for. It has nothing to do with the candidate, who is hardly a Republican anyway (but it sure has been a useful vehicle to get him close to election).
Look, Khan wasn't even criticised for being a war hero; his Islamic fascist parents were criticised. It's not the same thing as disrespecting a war hero, not even remotely close.
Everyone on the left or attached to the left is off limits because of association alone, I get it.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Did you plug your ears while he was talking, because what he said was definitely not in support of the Khan family.
sure, before the civil rights movement and the parties basically switched - with the Republicans taking over for the racist democrats in the south. Such a tired argument. You may as well be comparing the Wig party of the 1700's.
Republicans didn't build the projects. Democrats did. And the projects are racist to the core.
Look, Khan wasn't even criticised for being a war hero; his Islamic fascist parents were criticised. It's not the same thing as disrespecting a war hero, not even remotely close.
Everyone on the left or attached to the left is off limits because of association alone, I get it.
sure, before the civil rights movement and the parties basically switched - with the Republicans taking over for the racist democrats in the south. Such a tired argument. You may as well be comparing the Wig party of the 1700's.
lol. Accusing him? He proves it time and time again. Again, how long would it have taken you to disavow support from the KKK? Would you even have to give it a second thought? I wouldn't think so.
maybe he thinks judges shouldn't be hispanic or muslim. But that's not racist at all. right?
lol. Accusing him? He proves it time and time again. Again, how long would it have taken you to disavow support from the KKK? Would you even have to give it a second thought? I wouldn't think so.
maybe he thinks judges shouldn't be hispanic or muslim. But that's not racist at all. right?
Leave a comment: