Hillary Sucks.

[M-technik-3]

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/24/the-missing-man-at-the-center-of-hillary-clinton-s-email-scandal.html

Anybody see this one? When does he turn up dead?

Oh and when does the affordable care act get squashed?

http://nypost.com/2016/07/24/the-latest-nail-in-obamacares-coffin/

[flyboyx]

Everyone needs to keep in mind that we are comparing someone who has devoted her life to political work as opposed to a private citizen, albeit a "celebrity" type. (Not saying career politicos are good!!!)

As such there is a whole set of other politicians who have actively sought to scrutinize almost every facet of a life in as opposed to someone who has really only been subjected to journalistic scrutiny.

I'd imagine that if we knew (or had ready access to) as much information about Trump as we do about Clinton that we would find them each to be unpalatable and unqualified, or even criminal by degrees.

So, when faced with equally questionable options there's really no reason to support either. Yet, being people, we latch on to some sin or merit of one or the other that makes the other the devil incarnate. That's just sad, and it makes normal, rational discussion about either almost impossible.

wow. that is really....prophetic. i'm indeed very impressed.

Hilary is still a skanky K.u.n.t turned inside out by a shit dick. i don't have much better to say about the asshole candidate #2 either.


so, i guess as you were saying above, they are about even in my book too.

[roguetoaster]

Cute, she has "flaws"
She's a habitual lier, she set up the private server to avoid scrutiny, she deleted emails against federal regulations, she completely misled congress about Benghazi, she sold access thru her "charity"
And you describe her as having flaws?

Cute

Everyone needs to keep in mind that we are comparing someone who has devoted her life to political work as opposed to a private citizen, albeit a "celebrity" type. (Not saying career politicos are good!!!)

As such there is a whole set of other politicians who have actively sought to scrutinize almost every facet of a life in as opposed to someone who has really only been subjected to journalistic scrutiny.

I'd imagine that if we knew (or had ready access to) as much information about Trump as we do about Clinton that we would find them each to be unpalatable and unqualified, or even criminal by degrees.

So, when faced with equally questionable options there's really no reason to support either. Yet, being people, we latch on to some sin or merit of one or the other that makes the other the devil incarnate. That's just sad, and it makes normal, rational discussion about either almost impossible.

[gwb72tii]

Oh please.

I'm not going to argue that Hillary doesn't have flaws, but compared to Trump? Come on.

This gives me some hope, that there are intelligent people in the R party who see him for what he is:

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/23/12258018/republican-convention-delegate-nevertrump

I don't like Cruz either, but at least he's shown he has a backbone, while illustrating how spineless the rest of his party is.

A vote for anyone else is basically a vote for Trump. You can argue about third parties all you want, but it's the truth and everyone knows it.

Cute, she has "flaws"
She's a habitual lier, she set up the private server to avoid scrutiny, she deleted emails against federal regulations, she completely misled congress about Benghazi, she sold access thru her "charity"
And you describe her as having flaws?

Cute

[Dozyproductions]

Oh please.

I'm not going to argue that Hillary doesn't have flaws, but compared to Trump? Come on.

Absolutely. You want to talk about Trump lying? That's a tuesday lunch routine for Clinton... in office. Let's not talk about the rest of the things she has done when she or bill was in office. 13 hours worth of testimony about bhengazi and hours worth for he emails of pure BS and lies. That's some good old character. Then there's the "documentaries" you can buy, have watch on TV (for the past 26 years) and now watch on youtube. If you can't believe most of what those taps are saying fine but if ANYTHING is true in those HOURS worth of video then she shouldn't be President because it was done all the while in an official government office. Besides, by law she isn't allowed to be president. By law. She get's a free pass and that doesn't just come because of the positions she's held.

Trump hasn't been in office to prove anything good or BAD. I hope for dear god that he's playing us dumbass american's as a strategy to get in to office. C'mon a wall? Deporting all those millions of people and etc?? I will say that atm, it doesn't seem like he's in the CFR gang (officially) and that's huge points for me. She says that she has experience? What has it gotten us? Show me. Do people still think all the clintons did was Bill playing the sax and monica lewinski? There's a reason people seem to like them but not know anything about their past.

Help me get this televised debate going. Do something about it instead of just being argumentative on a forum. Its a long shot on all fronts but the national consciousness has to change.

[nando]

Oh please.

I'm not going to argue that Hillary doesn't have flaws, but compared to Trump? Come on.

This gives me some hope, that there are intelligent people in the R party who see him for what he is:

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/23/12258018/republican-convention-delegate-nevertrump

I don't like Cruz either, but at least he's shown he has a backbone, while illustrating how spineless the rest of his party is.

A vote for anyone else is basically a vote for Trump. You can argue about third parties all you want, but it's the truth and everyone knows it.

[djjerme]

Every email you read from it should end with a sad trombone..

..and yet, it won't faze some in to sticking with the establishment because they are so scared to choose something other than a D when they vote.

Sent from my 710C using Tapatalk

[M-technik-3]

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

Sounds like the hack by the Russians on the DNC released 20K emails.

[flyboyx]

I truly believe that the electoral votes were rigged. Unfortunately, the system is set up so they can be.

That c-waffle simply had the good fortune to be in a political position to make the right deals so all those votes went to her.

I hate that bitch.

[roguetoaster]

Wikileaks breaks another bomb shell. DNC sounds like the rigged the primary's.

When thinking about rigging an election, just ask yourself what's more likely, that people across America colluded on a massive scale to hand the nomination to one person, or that good, honest, everyday people (you know, the ones running the actual election process) did their utmost to assure that the system functions fairly, especially considering the vast differences in election systems locally.

Conspiracy theories can be fun, but I do believe that the vast majority of the time they are simply untrue, although they are often based on a kernel of truth.

So, Kaine, good, bad, or indifferent?

[marshallnoise]

Wikileaks breaks another bomb shell. DNC sounds like the rigged the primary's.

Link?

[M-technik-3]

Wikileaks breaks another bomb shell. DNC sounds like the rigged the primary's.

[gwb72tii]

Oh look, a "documentary" by the author of a widely discredited book (even on the conservative side). I didn't know you still read children's fiction - and now there will be pretty pictures!

So you are defending Hillary?

[BraveUlysses]

More drive by commentary Lolololol

yes, your incoherent posts are drive by commentary

yes hillary does indeed suck, at being qualified to be president
this is about Benghazi, nit about the killing per se, but about hillary and her ability to be responsive to federal law
can she be pres and not have a security clearance?

[nando]

the link your homeboy posted above?