Lena Dunham Vs. Milo Yiannopoulos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Schnitzer318is
    replied
    A little late here... but both of these individuals give their generation a bad name, let alone their respective political affiliates/contemporaries.

    Leave a comment:


  • rhE-30
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    Sounds like a child molesting piece of human garbage to me. What point are you trying to make?
    Just wanted know if other people thought that guy was a piece of sh!t as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hooffenstein HD
    replied
    Originally posted by rhE-30
    Is your opinion the same of Robert Henry Richards?
    Sounds like a child molesting piece of human garbage to me. What point are you trying to make?

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by rhE-30
    Is your opinion the same of Robert Henry Richards?


    Why wouldn't he?

    Leave a comment:


  • rhE-30
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    She's a child molesting piece of shit. no matter how hypocritical the SJW left wants to be, there is no excuse for that.
    Is your opinion the same of Robert Henry Richards?

    Leave a comment:


  • gwb72tii
    replied
    Originally posted by Farbin Kaiber
    rightmeow.
    Meow?

    Leave a comment:


  • z31maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    The hell are you even talking about, dude? Why would I not inform myself on the very topic of the thread before posting in it?

    Her whole personality/career is based around being a lefty SJW feminist but that's besides the point. The point is the blatant hypocrisy exhibited by lefties. They give her a pass and even laud her as some kind of hero but demonise others whose views don't align with theirs for doing similar things.
    Oh god. This may be the best post in the thread. Well played.

    Drop the mic and go pour yourself a drink.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    That's racist.

    Seriously though, you should probably read some more. On going abuse over a ten year period only ending when Lena was 17. Spreading her sister's vagina open, masturbating together, bribing her to kiss her are all in the scope of what she did over that ten years. Realistically there is probably more that she doesn't want to openly admit to. Lena herself describes her actions as the behaviour of a sexual predator and she's completely unapologetic about it. She apologises if she triggered any "feminists" but hasn't directly apologised for her actions and doesn't care about what "conservative white males" think. She's even gone as far to joke that her abuse is what turned her sister gay. For some reason she's lauded by the media as a "feminist hero", whatever that means.


    Josh Duggars behaviour was very much similar in the same kind of age range. Despite being apologetic of his actions and expressing a clear understanding that what he did was wrong, he's completely demonised, branded a child molester and slammed by the media.

    Milo was a victim of sexual abuse, even though he feels it was consensual and he might have actually been the predator in his circumstances, he's completely bashed by the media, loses his book deal etc etc etc.

    In the context of this thread, I'm absolutely going to side with the "victim" over the perpetrator.
    I don't agree with Milo on all points, nor am I defending Josh Duggar's behaviour, however I will always speak out against the blatant hypocrisy from the matriarchal left.
    Took this advice. I should've gone beyond the two articles I read which only spoke of a curious 7 year old, not a predatory teenager.

    What's shooting Milo in the foot is not coming forward and being totally transparent with who he saw committing these acts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Farbin Kaiber
    replied
    Before we make it to Page #2, I'd like to thank those who have posted and maintained the focus of the thread and not gone on personal attacks, I'm rather proud of r3v rightmeow.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajhostetter
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    The hell are you even talking about, dude? Why would I not inform myself on the very topic of the thread before posting in it?

    Her whole personality/career is based around being a lefty SJW feminist but that's besides the point. The point is the blatant hypocrisy exhibited by lefties. They give her a pass and even laud her as some kind of hero but demonise others who's views don't align with theirs for doing similar things.
    QFT. The blind hypocrisy is really just astounding.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hooffenstein HD
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    Why exactly are you holding her up as an example of 'the left'? she's no more representative of 'the left' than josh duggar is of 'the right'.

    like i just dont even understand how you have the time or willingness to give a shit about one more stupid celebrity, or spend time reading about what she put in her book or cheer the idea of her dying.

    like how do you even have the time to give a fuck about this?
    The hell are you even talking about, dude? Why would I not inform myself on the very topic of the thread before posting in it?

    Her whole personality/career is based around being a lefty SJW feminist but that's besides the point. The point is the blatant hypocrisy exhibited by lefties. They give her a pass and even laud her as some kind of hero but demonise others whose views don't align with theirs for doing similar things.
    Last edited by Hooffenstein HD; 02-24-2017, 01:39 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marshallnoise
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    Why exactly are you holding her up as an example of 'the left'? she's no more representative of 'the left' than josh duggar is of 'the right'.

    like i just dont even understand how you have the time or willingness to give a shit about one more stupid celebrity, or spend time reading about what she put in her book or cheer the idea of her dying.

    like how do you even have the time to give a fuck about this?
    Really? Her whole existence centers around her political POV. She proudly identifies as a leftist and many view her as a standard bearer of leftist views.

    If Milo is going to get raked over the coals for being Lena's sister (effectively), then Lena deserves even more criticism yet there is a strange absence of criticism.

    What is strange is the you are giving Hoff shit for being educated about another person. Kind of makes me think you wish he wasn't as smart as he is so these inconvenient facts can not be a topic du jour.

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by Hooffenstein HD
    That's racist.

    Seriously though, you should probably read some more. On going abuse over a ten year period only ending when Lena was 17. Spreading her sister's vagina open, masturbating together, bribing her to kiss her are all in the scope of what she did over that ten years. Realistically there is probably more that she doesn't want to openly admit to. Lena herself describes her actions as the behaviour of a sexual predator and she's completely unapologetic about it. She apologises if she triggered any "feminists" but hasn't directly apologised for her actions and doesn't care about what "conservative white males" think. She's even gone as far to joke that her abuse is what turned her sister gay. For some reason she's lauded by the media as a "feminist hero", whatever that means.


    Josh Duggars behaviour was very much similar in the same kind of age range. Despite being apologetic of his actions and expressing a clear understanding that what he did was wrong, he's completely demonised, branded a child molester and slammed by the media.

    Milo was a victim of sexual abuse, even though he feels it was consensual and he might have actually been the predator in his circumstances, he's completely bashed by the media, loses his book deal etc etc etc.

    In the context of this thread, I'm absolutely going to side with the "victim" over the perpetrator.
    I don't agree with Milo on all points, nor am I defending Josh Duggar's behaviour, however I will always speak out against the blatant hypocrisy from the matriarchal left.
    Why exactly are you holding her up as an example of 'the left'? she's no more representative of 'the left' than josh duggar is of 'the right'.

    like i just dont even understand how you have the time or willingness to give a shit about one more stupid celebrity, or spend time reading about what she put in her book or cheer the idea of her dying.

    like how do you even have the time to give a fuck about this?

    Leave a comment:


  • naplesE30
    replied
    Cale: please read last sentence of my previous post..... we truly need some self-reflection as individuals and society as a whole. I personally can't stand Milo and rather enjoyed the egg on CPAC's face when this all went down. However, I believe what he said doesn't compare to what Lena and guys like Roman Polanski have done and largely been given a pass on. I am glad Milo lost all his speaking engagements and book deal etc. He should have, but how you can dismiss what Lena did and rationalize it speaks volumes to me as to your ability to look at things objectionably.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hooffenstein HD
    replied
    Originally posted by cale
    Had no SA on this, upon reading she was 7 years old and looked at her sisters vagina. You people are royally fucked if you can interpret that in any way sexually, or as behaviors of a predator.
    That's racist.

    Seriously though, you should probably read some more. On going abuse over a ten year period only ending when Lena was 17. Spreading her sister's vagina open, masturbating together, bribing her to kiss her are all in the scope of what she did over that ten years. Realistically there is probably more that she doesn't want to openly admit to. Lena herself describes her actions as the behaviour of a sexual predator and she's completely unapologetic about it. She apologises if she triggered any "feminists" but hasn't directly apologised for her actions and doesn't care about what "conservative white males" think. She's even gone as far to joke that her abuse is what turned her sister gay. For some reason she's lauded by the media as a "feminist hero", whatever that means.


    Josh Duggars behaviour was very much similar in the same kind of age range. Despite being apologetic of his actions and expressing a clear understanding that what he did was wrong, he's completely demonised, branded a child molester and slammed by the media.

    Milo was a victim of sexual abuse, even though he feels it was consensual and he might have actually been the predator in his circumstances, he's completely bashed by the media, loses his book deal etc etc etc.

    In the context of this thread, I'm absolutely going to side with the "victim" over the perpetrator.
    I don't agree with Milo on all points, nor am I defending Josh Duggar's behaviour, however I will always speak out against the blatant hypocrisy from the matriarchal left.

    Leave a comment:

Working...