Sharia protests

[mrsleeve]

Thing about argument is Hillary has ADMITTED to breaking laws...... so you were going where with that exctaly

[BraveUlysses]

No. His argument is that since he wasn't charged in a court of law and found guilty, then he is presumed innocent. That's how it works in this country.

*holds breath while i wait for sleeve and everyone else in here called hillary a criminal to admit she's not a criminal because she wasn't ever charged*










*dies of asphyxiation*

[mrsleeve]

No. His argument is that since he wasn't charged in a court of law and found guilty, then he is presumed innocent. That's how it works in this country.

Factually correct and from a legality perspective as well

Again ding ding winner winner chicken dinner

[marshallnoise]

Says the Clinton defender.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[BraveUlysses]

How is Trump a racist or rapist? Usually to be named a rapist one needs to have been charged with the crime. Pretty hard to be a president with a felony charge

Accusations against a rich man are always funny.

defending people who brag about sexual assault is so fucking cringy

[z31maniac]

your argument is that since he was elected, he must be innocent? are you fucking kidding me? and more to the point, would you say the same if hillary had won? somehow i doubt it.

No. His argument is that since he wasn't charged in a court of law and found guilty, then he is presumed innocent. That's how it works in this country.

[decay]

How is Trump a racist or rapist? Usually to be named a rapist one needs to have been charged with the crime. Pretty hard to be a president with a felony charge

Accusations against a rich man are always funny.

your argument is that since he was elected, he must be innocent? are you fucking kidding me? and more to the point, would you say the same if hillary had won? somehow i doubt it.

if you aren't informed enough to be aware of the racism (muslim travel ban, mexican border wall) or the sexual assault that he *bragged about* ("grab them by the waffleswaffleswaffleswaffleswaffles"), you really shouldn't be chiming in here, because you aren't going to have anything of value to contribute.

[LBJefferies]

No no no. That's a tactic YOU engage in. If you understood context and didn't cherry pick your quotes like you say you do, you would have never gone to the Treaty of Tripoli quote in the first place. Why is this so easy?

Given what that quote from the Treaty of Tripoli says, I would say it has a pretty broad context.

[Mediumrarechicken]

that aside, your statement that we should get rid of just the terrorist christians, but *all* of the muslims have to go, have made your position pretty clear.

it's just unfortunate that you're part of a voting bloc big enough to get a racist/rapist/con-man elected.

How is Trump a racist or rapist? Usually to be named a rapist one needs to have been charged with the crime. Pretty hard to be a president with a felony charge

Accusations against a rich man are always funny.

[decay]

that's the one place you are right, it was not particularly brilliant of you to make that statement.

[marshallnoise]

Which is not brilliant.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[decay]

no, it isn't; the foundation for your argument was incorrect, which invalidated and made irrelevant everything following.

[marshallnoise]

the fact that you think "LOL GTFO" is a counterargument makes me wonder why you think you're capable of "entertaining" a thought process at any deeper level than sitting a 2-year-old down in front of an episode of teletubbies. :)

you are so absolutely wrong here that i am ignoring everything that follows this argument.

LOL and GTFO is a dismissal, not a counterargument. But the above, wow, that's laziness.

[decay]

Duuuude, I entertained your thought process FOR FUN and you get to flip that around? LOL! GTFO.

the fact that you think "LOL GTFO" is a counterargument makes me wonder why you think you're capable of "entertaining" a thought process at any deeper level than sitting a 2-year-old down in front of an episode of teletubbies. :)

[marshallnoise]

that aside, your statement that we should get rid of just the terrorist christians, but *all* of the muslims have to go, have made your position pretty clear.

it's just unfortunate that you're part of a voting bloc big enough to get a racist/rapist/con-man elected.

Duuuude, I entertained your thought process FOR FUN and you get to flip that around? LOL! GTFO.