Should a high School incident be relevant 35 years later?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrBurgundy
    R3V Elite
    • Mar 2012
    • 5323

    #136
    Originally posted by Elysian
    July 1st, 1982.


    Ummmm still circumstantial


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Current Collection: 1990 325is // 1987 325i Vert // 2003 525i 5spd // 1985 380SL // 1992 Ranger 5spd // 2005 Avalanche // 2024 Honda Grom SP // 2024 Yamaha XSR700 // 2024 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

    Comment

    • Elysian
      Mod Crazy
      • Apr 2010
      • 674

      #137
      Originally posted by MrBurgundy
      Ummmm still circumstantial


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      You're kidding, right?

      She just happens to name the names of people Kavanaugh partied with, before the calendar was released, when Kavanaugh claims he doesn't know her? Circumstantial my ass.

      I got it, it was all Bart O'Kavanaugh

      Comment

      • MrBurgundy
        R3V Elite
        • Mar 2012
        • 5323

        #138
        Originally posted by Elysian
        You're kidding, right?



        She just happens to name the names of people Kavanaugh partied with, before the calendar was released, when Kavanaugh claims he doesn't know her? Circumstantial my ass.


        Does that conclusively prove his guilt?


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        Current Collection: 1990 325is // 1987 325i Vert // 2003 525i 5spd // 1985 380SL // 1992 Ranger 5spd // 2005 Avalanche // 2024 Honda Grom SP // 2024 Yamaha XSR700 // 2024 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

        Comment

        • Elysian
          Mod Crazy
          • Apr 2010
          • 674

          #139
          Originally posted by MrBurgundy
          Does that conclusively prove his guilt?


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Sure casts some doubt. Is he on trial yet?

          And again, he's still lying his ass off under oath. Devils Triangle a drinking game? Boofing means farting? My ass, pun intended. He lies about small things, he lies about big things, the guy just plain lies.

          Comment

          • MrBurgundy
            R3V Elite
            • Mar 2012
            • 5323

            #140
            Originally posted by Elysian
            Sure casts some doubt. Is he on trial yet?

            And again, he's still lying his ass off under oath. Devils Triangle a drinking game? Boofing means farting? My ass, pun intended. He lies about small things, he lies about big things, the guy just plain lies.
            It seems like you want him to be guilty for other reasons outside of the presented evidence, because you and I know that based on her testimony that there is no way in hell you can prove that Brett was the assaulter.
            Current Collection: 1990 325is // 1987 325i Vert // 2003 525i 5spd // 1985 380SL // 1992 Ranger 5spd // 2005 Avalanche // 2024 Honda Grom SP // 2024 Yamaha XSR700 // 2024 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

            Comment

            • naplesE30
              E30 Mastermind
              • Nov 2007
              • 1830

              #141
              I would hope that regardless of ones feelings towards BK and this particular case everyone would reject the idiocy of “believe all women” there is some serious exposure of idiocy in this movement.

              Comment

              • gwb72tii
                No R3VLimiter
                • Nov 2005
                • 3864

                #142
                it's curious why anyone thinks this lady is credible. Supposed witnesses do not support her story and in fact support Kavanaugh.

                She can't get the year correct, can't remember what age she was, cannot remember specifics about the attack, on and on. Yet her word is good enough to destroy a guy's life.

                She'd be laughed out of court if she ever got that far.

                BTW - i asked my wife if anything like this had happened to ehr, and to my surprise, because she had never told me, it had. About the same age, two guys etc. She remembers every detail, vividly. And their names. Ford apparently cannot remember last week.

                here you go
                The prosecutor who questioned Christine Blasey Ford about her allegations against Kavanaugh released a memo detailing inconsistencies in her story.
                “There is nothing government can give you that it hasn’t taken from you in the first place”
                Sir Winston Churchill

                Comment

                • MrBurgundy
                  R3V Elite
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 5323

                  #143
                  This whole fiasco has really shed some light on how ridiculous people are and to be quite frank, how delusional people can be....

                  For all you men out there that blindly support this accusation, you're literally supporting a movement that is creating a dangerous social climate for men.

                  Just being accused of sexual assault will ruin your life, regardless if it is true or not... An accusation of this nature should be taken seriously, and believing that BK was the assaulter based on what we know is plain stupid.
                  Current Collection: 1990 325is // 1987 325i Vert // 2003 525i 5spd // 1985 380SL // 1992 Ranger 5spd // 2005 Avalanche // 2024 Honda Grom SP // 2024 Yamaha XSR700 // 2024 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon

                  Comment

                  • Wschnitz
                    R3V OG
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 8089

                    #144
                    Hilarious how many of you are still caught up in the allegations from Ford when thats not even whats cooking him.

                    Its that he lies about everything.
                    1989 BMW 325is | 2019 Ford Ranger FX4
                    willschnitz

                    Comment

                    • Elysian
                      Mod Crazy
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 674

                      #145


                      Another day, another Kavanaugh lie. He told the Judiciary Committee, under oath, that he first heard of the Ramirez allegations in the New Yorker article. That was a lie, he was already working behind the scenes to refute them before they went public.

                      Comment

                      • Elysian
                        Mod Crazy
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 674

                        #146
                        Originally posted by MrBurgundy
                        It seems like you want him to be guilty for other reasons outside of the presented evidence, because you and I know that based on her testimony that there is no way in hell you can prove that Brett was the assaulter.
                        True, I've already outlined the lies that disqualify him from the SCOTUS, without even touching on the ever piling allegations (we're up to 6 now). I'm glad you picked up on that.


                        edit: Swetnick is doing an interview now, she claimed she contacted the Montgomery County Police about these parties, the officer is dead and it could take a month to get the Montgomery County record of the call.

                        Comment

                        • mbonder
                          R3VLimited
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 2255

                          #147
                          Originally posted by Wschnitz
                          Hilarious how many of you are still caught up in the allegations from Ford when thats not even whats cooking him.

                          Its that he lies about everything.
                          Quoted for truth

                          Comment

                          • parkerbink
                            R3V OG
                            • Jun 2004
                            • 10137

                            #148
                            Originally posted by z31maniac
                            Nope, your own words.

                            It's pretty clear that you think regardless if he committed the crime, he should be excluded from consideration. Whatever issues you have with him are not germane to this particular discussion, since it's about this allegation.

                            And my point is that if he didn't commit the crime, it should be inadmissible. Why is this so hard to grasp?
                            That RESPONSE to someone you cherry picked ignores my full post regarding the allegations are not the point. The lies are.

                            Good job trying to prove a non point.

                            [IMG]https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/my350z.com-vbulletin/550x225/80-parkerbsig_5096690e71d912ec1addc4a84e99c374685fc03 8.jpg[/IMG

                            Comment

                            • parkerbink
                              R3V OG
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 10137

                              #149
                              Originally posted by gwb72tii
                              it's curious why anyone thinks this lady is credible. Supposed witnesses do not support her story and in fact support kavanaugh.

                              She can't get the year correct, can't remember what age she was, cannot remember specifics about the attack, on and on. Yet her word is good enough to destroy a guy's life.

                              She'd be laughed out of court if she ever got that far.

                              Btw - i asked my wife if anything like this had happened to ehr, and to my surprise, because she had never told me, it had. About the same age, two guys etc. She remembers every detail, vividly. And their names. Ford apparently cannot remember last week.

                              Here you go
                              http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/...ccusers-story/


                              trump said she is credible.


                              Now what????????

                              [IMG]https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/my350z.com-vbulletin/550x225/80-parkerbsig_5096690e71d912ec1addc4a84e99c374685fc03 8.jpg[/IMG

                              Comment

                              • Elysian
                                Mod Crazy
                                • Apr 2010
                                • 674

                                #150
                                Originally posted by parkerbink
                                That RESPONSE to someone you cherry picked ignores my full post regarding the allegations are not the point. The lies are.

                                Good job trying to prove a non point.
                                Yes, seems they only want to cherry pick anything about allegations, nothing about the lies he tells.

                                Comment

                                Working...