Should a high School incident be relevant 35 years later?

[decay]

I didn't say wearing a mask should be illegal that was someone else, so if you want to play that card, keep it straight as well. That was gwb at the top of this page.

Also, couldn't care less about your politics. I pointed something out in your statement and like decay always does, instead of addressing it, you change the subject.

*yawn*

your failure to understand the connection between the two statements does not make it a subject change

[z31maniac]

your failure to understand the connection between the two statements does not make it a subject change

Go ahead and explain then.

GWB said there should be enhanced penalties for wearing masks while protesting. I never agreed or disagreed, but Danny pointed out in California there is already a statute regarding this.

I compared Antifa to the KKK because they both conceal their identities because they don't want to be held accountable for their crimes.


Oh right, the connection is both groups are afraid to stand up, publicly, for their beliefs.

[decay]

Oh right, the connection is both groups are afraid to stand up, publicly, for their beliefs.

add me on facebook and you'll see how shy i am about having anti-fascist sentiments associated with my real name

[z31maniac]

add me on facebook and you'll see how shy i am about having anti-fascist sentiments associated with my real name

Ya know, I would consider taking you up on that to see how you present your views without us busting your balls. But I'm not sure you wouldn't try to doxx me to prove to a point.

I mean we both know we could doxx each other, but even though we disagree, I wouldn't go that far.

[decay]

Ya know, I would consider taking you up on that to see how you present your views without us busting your balls. But I'm not sure you wouldn't try to doxx me to prove to a point.

I mean we both know we could doxx each other, but even though we disagree, I wouldn't go that far.

facebook or otherwise, you have my word that i will not do that. yeah we disagree a lot but you're not a white supremacist and you don't present a threat to anyone i know, which are the only two reasons i can think of that i'd bother.

[gwb72tii]

Go ahead and explain then.

GWB said there should be enhanced penalties for wearing masks while protesting. I never agreed or disagreed, but Danny pointed out in California there is already a statute regarding this.

I compared Antifa to the KKK because they both conceal their identities because they don't want to be held accountable for their crimes.


Oh right, the connection is both groups are afraid to stand up, publicly, for their beliefs.

Enhanced penalties for committing a crime while masked, not while protesting

[decay]

Enhanced penalties for committing a crime while masked, not while protesting

i'm glad you clarified that.

to reiterate, the reasons people wear masks is that even peaceful protest can get you doxxed.

[CarpHunter]

So nobody going to point out the obvious irony here? People debating the wearing of masks for anonymity in real life. While using the anonymity of an online forum, I.e. a mask, to voice their opinions about the very same subjects.

[mrsleeve]

troll account is a troll

[Schnitzer318is]

to reiterate, the reasons people wear masks is that even peaceful protest can get you doxxed.

So are you for or against doxxing? Seems you straddle the line based on the circumstance.

Personally, doxxing of individuals personal information should be illegal. Doxxing or whistleblowing of government agencies, or government personnel's work info, etc I'm okay with. And the reason for this is that, in most cases, I believe the public has a right to know what it's government and it's officials are up to. We put them there, and we pay for it.

[z31maniac]

So nobody going to point out the obvious irony here? People debating the wearing of masks for anonymity in real life. While using the anonymity of an online forum, I.e. a mask, to voice their opinions about the very same subjects.

Many of the people in this subforum, and the forum in general know each other personally. Have hung out with them, have their phone numbers, and speak to each other outside of the forum.

[decay]

So are you for or against doxxing? Seems you straddle the line based on the circumstance.

i listed the two conditions that would make me consider doing it, three posts above yours. on this page. come on man, fucking read.

[Schnitzer318is]

i listed the two conditions that would make me consider doing it, three posts above yours. on this page. come on man, fucking read.

5 posts... but who's counting.

I was looking for clarification. You were okay with politician's personal information being leaked earlier in the thread. Or am I remembering someone else?

[decay]

5 posts... but who's counting.

I was looking for clarification. You were okay with politician's personal information being leaked earlier in the thread. Or am I remembering someone else?

still on the SAME FUCKING PAGE, so point stands.

after you clarifying what you meant, yes. ideologically, this is somewhere i’m probably in alignment with the libertarian crowd here. if politicians have access to my paycheck without my consent, then they forfeit their right to privacy.

i still have rules of engagement that apply after that general sentiment. you’ve read those conditions already.

that’ll be my opinion until you find a better way to hold our public servants accountable for their actions.

[naplesE30]

that’ll be my opinion until you find a better way to hold our public servants accountable for their actions.

Vote much? Seems a pretty good way to hold politicians accountable. Not changing many minds by doxxing and screaming at them at dinner, or their front yard..... quite the opposite actually. I have yet to hear a politician say the screaming protester throwing a temper tantrum persuaded them.