I got two 885 heads. One is missing a rocker arm.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SoCal General Chat
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by mkcman17 View PostNo, just half-assedly cleaned. I was expecting my mpg to be considerably worse, because I burn tanks like no one's business. Maybe I'm just used to the mpg of my truck...
Originally posted by IronmanE30 View PostMike, did you notice an improvement in performance with the larger injectors?
「'89 BMW 325is | '02 Mitsubishi Montero Limited | '2005 GMC Sierra 2500 Duramax | 2007 BMW M5 」
「my feedback thread」
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronmanE30 View PostMike, did you notice an improvement in performance with the larger injectors?
Originally posted by ethrtyiS View Posti feel like you would get better mpg if you had rebuilt them. when i rebuilt mine, they were so dirty and clogged. definitely going too hinder your mpg.
Originally posted by ethrtyiS View Postyou won't feel much of a gain unless you pair it with a bigger maf and tune.1989 325is / 2.7, 274 cam, e30 M3 5-lug
1989 LN106 Hilux / 3.0TD SFA
1974 2002tii / stock
2002 IS300 / 5spd LSD
Comment
-
I get like 25 - 26 mpg when I'm cruising at 55mph which is weird since I have a Dinan chip and I'd figure that I'd get worse mpg. Anyways, I still have yet to put in my new injectors so that will most likely affect my gas mileage.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the bigger the injector, the more gas getting sent to the engine? Wouldn't that reduce the MPG?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mkcman17 View Postapparently not, because i mathematically averaged over 24mpg.
Originally posted by mkcman17 View Posteven so, it's not exactly what you'd call a blow your face off difference.
「'89 BMW 325is | '02 Mitsubishi Montero Limited | '2005 GMC Sierra 2500 Duramax | 2007 BMW M5 」
「my feedback thread」
Comment
-
i don't understand, why can someone argue that an e36 m3 is superior to an e30 m3. i just can't wrap my head around that concept.
「'89 BMW 325is | '02 Mitsubishi Montero Limited | '2005 GMC Sierra 2500 Duramax | 2007 BMW M5 」
「my feedback thread」
Comment
-
Originally posted by turge View PostI get like 25 - 26 mpg when I'm cruising at 55mph which is weird since I have a Dinan chip and I'd figure that I'd get worse mpg. Anyways, I still have yet to put in my new injectors so that will most likely affect my gas mileage.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the bigger the injector, the more gas getting sent to the engine? Wouldn't that reduce the MPG?
The Dinan chip, well arguments aside that it's not doing much, so we'll say a "performance" chip would in theory increase power or at least shift it into a more usable band and that should mean it can do the same work as before more efficiently.Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!
Comment
-
Originally posted by turge View PostI get like 25 - 26 mpg when I'm cruising at 55mph which is weird since I have a Dinan chip and I'd figure that I'd get worse mpg. Anyways, I still have yet to put in my new injectors so that will most likely affect my gas mileage.
Originally posted by ethrtyiS View Postwell mine read 24-26mpg all the time with my heavy ass foot and my driving.1989 325is / 2.7, 274 cam, e30 M3 5-lug
1989 LN106 Hilux / 3.0TD SFA
1974 2002tii / stock
2002 IS300 / 5spd LSD
Comment
-
Originally posted by howdyhoayman View PostAnyone local have an early model shift linkage? Lemme know ASAP. 310-714-0808
It wasn't me!
ahah JK Aymando!!! Good luck with your transmission!
jou ma se poes in 'n fishpaste jar.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Transaction Feedback
Comment
-
Originally posted by smooth View PostNo, your engine management is just going to run the injectors at a lower duty cycle.
The Dinan chip, well arguments aside that it's not doing much, so we'll say a "performance" chip would in theory increase power or at least shift it into a more usable band and that should mean it can do the same work as before more efficiently.
Comment
Comment