Originally posted by Wh33lhop
View Post
However, the stance is that mutation and adaptation are still different. Mutations are genetic one-offs that occur randomly: it has nothing to do with reproduction. An Adaptation is a sequence of conditioning where a species shifts (either by physiological factors or psychological) to adapt better to it's enviornment. In essence it is a mutation, but it is a tactful conclusion adapted from its environment to further develop more and more offspring.
That's why the scientific definition for NS is worded the way it is.
Thus; in nature, because basic instinct in animals are to develops more offspring, there have been no documented natural occurrences of homosexuality in animal mating and breeding patterns that have not been synthetically produced by means of manipulation through experimentation.
TL:DR
All natural breeding in animals has ever produced is male on female baby-making. Male on male has been accomplished but it has been through prolonged and sex-less exposure to the two animals of same sex in an experimental setting.
Ergo; testosterone's gotta be dealt with somehow...
Conclusion? Homosexuality is an unnatural choice.
It's not misogyny, sexism, homophobia, or kainitophobia. It's science.
Comment