Anyone running a RMS S/C on a swap car?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • E30FTW
    Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 76

    #16
    I'm running a Rotrex C38 CF blower on my S52 e30. It is Active Autowerkes stage II kit, with a smaller (higher boost) pulley. I call it stage 2.5...

    Makes 400whp+

    All the plumbing, be it intake, hot side, or cold side all needed to be custom made. Some of the AA plumbing was able to be cut up, reclocked, and otherwise utilized, but most of it was made from new materials.

    The power delivery is great, and its entirely possible to drive the car like a normal person and not know you have a rocket ship under your right foot.

    Comment

    • triggrhaapi
      Grease Monkey
      • Feb 2007
      • 350

      #17
      I bet. I'm torn because the power response from the Eurosport kit is incredible, the aftercooling is equally so, and the price is insanely unbeatable.

      My only concern is if the kit will clear my IX booster.
      1987 BMW 325is | Frankenmotor S50 | Supersprint Replica Headers | K&N Intake | Gutted Stock Midpipe | Zimmermann Rotors | Stainless Brake Lines | Porterfield Racing Pads

      Comment

      • sharky
        R3VLimited
        • Jan 2005
        • 2672

        #18
        if what will clear the ix booster? As for the C38, yeah I am sure doing the IC was a pain in the ass as far as tubing. Thankfully rubber flexible with the heat excanger. i think the intake on my RMS is going to be the tricky bit.

        Comment

        • triggrhaapi
          Grease Monkey
          • Feb 2007
          • 350

          #19
          The Eurosport kit is an intake manifold with aftercooler and supercharger bolted to it.

          Looks like this:

          1987 BMW 325is | Frankenmotor S50 | Supersprint Replica Headers | K&N Intake | Gutted Stock Midpipe | Zimmermann Rotors | Stainless Brake Lines | Porterfield Racing Pads

          Comment

          • Bimmerman325i
            R3V OG
            • Dec 2007
            • 6854

            #20
            If I had the cash, that's the kit I'd buy.
            2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
            95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
            98 M3/4/5 (stock)

            Comment

            • evangreen
              Advanced Member
              • Aug 2007
              • 148

              #21
              Rms posted a group buy thread on here awhile ago, I thought it said that fitment wasn't an issue in an e30 with abs. Might want to check that thread, I believe there was a few pics of the setup on an e30

              Comment

              • rneedham1979
                E30 Modder
                • Jul 2008
                • 852

                #22
                What is the highest likely output from a TS, both whp and wtq?

                I understand and agree the TS is sweet in stock form but where does it max out?

                Originally posted by Bimmerman325i
                higher whp != better. Compare the torque curves of both stock kits. The Eurosport blows any CF blower out of the water.

                There are many of the TS kits making over 400whp with mods, just like your kit is making over 400whp with mods.


                Can you send a link? How many are running the same whp and wtq as a CF?

                Originally posted by triggrhaapi
                There's a guy on BFC who's been making over that since 2007. What the hell are you talking about?
                The TS is clearly a great set up but for the money a used CF seems more practical and has the ability to make more power with slight modifications. NO? There seem to be quite a few guys running the RMS sage II kit with different tunes making 420-450whp, are there TS making that kind of power? (this is a question)

                The one thing I know for sure is the OP won't be disappointed either way, 400whp supercharged E30 is pretty nasty!
                Last edited by rneedham1979; 02-23-2010, 08:11 AM.
                Turbo E30
                Roadkill 80lb 93 octane OBDI tune
                BavSol Cylinder Head
                Stock S50 in. cam Schrick ex. cam
                Otis' tubular T4 manifold
                Oringed 87mm S52, Eagle rods and 8.5:1 CP pistons.
                GT4094r w/Batmowheel Impeller
                614whp@17.5psi, 100 Oct
                690whp@21psi, 100 Oct
                801whp@27psi, 110 URT
                Old: 1/4 mile: 10.91@144.38 (636whp)
                New: ?
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_f7fUVqblI

                Comment

                • e30polak
                  R3V OG
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 6136

                  #23
                  After driving a 500whp RMS supercharged e36 a couple weeks ago, I decided to ditch the turbo idea. Hopefully I will have a stage 2 kit on my car by this summer.

                  And rneedham, we need videos of your beast! :hitler:
                  Check out Undr8d Empire on Facebook: www.facebook.com/Undr8dEmpireLlc

                  INSTAGRAM: @UNDR8D_EMPIRE

                  Scarlet V2 - #Project333Ti by @castromotorsport, @kingsautobodyshop, @bimmerheads, @hardmotorsport, @excel_motorsports & @mateomotorsports - http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=371356

                  Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                  Comment

                  • Bimmerman325i
                    R3V OG
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 6854

                    #24
                    Originally posted by rneedham1979
                    What is the highest likely output from a TS, both whp and wtq?

                    I understand and agree the TS is sweet in stock form but where does it max out?
                    No idea. Ask TRM or matt, I just know what I've read. 400whp is easy with those, and they make full boost off idle.



                    Originally posted by rneedham1979
                    Can you send a link? How many are running the same whp and wtq as a CF?
                    No idea and no idea. Numbers are pointless comparisons though. The TS makes the same wtq or more, and over a larger rpm band. Peak numbers are for dyno queen handitards.

                    Originally posted by rneedham1979
                    The TS is clearly a great set up but for the money a used CF seems more practical and has the ability to make more power with slight modifications. NO? There seem to be quite a few guys running the RMS sage II kit with different tunes making 420-450whp, are there TS making that kind of power? (this is a question)

                    The one thing I know for sure is the OP won't be disappointed either way, 400whp supercharged E30 is pretty nasty!
                    Ask TRM or matt that question, I'm far from an expert. They have set up many TS with 400whp. The new kit has a larger blower that should give much more tuning headroom. A 400whp TS is likely faster than a 500whp CF blower just because of how the power is delivered. Compare a dyno from each and you'll see what I mean.
                    2017 Chevrolet SS, 6MT
                    95 M3/2/5 (S54 and Mk60 DSC, CARB legal, Build Thread)
                    98 M3/4/5 (stock)

                    Comment

                    • triggrhaapi
                      Grease Monkey
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 350

                      #25
                      Originally posted by rneedham1979
                      The TS is clearly a great set up but for the money a used CF seems more practical and has the ability to make more power with slight modifications. NO? There seem to be quite a few guys running the RMS sage II kit with different tunes making 420-450whp, are there TS making that kind of power? (this is a question)

                      The one thing I know for sure is the OP won't be disappointed either way, 400whp supercharged E30 is pretty nasty!
                      The Eurosport is worth the extra money for all the area under the curve you get from it. The response is better, the intercooling is better, and yes, there are guys with 2.5L TS systems making 450whp.

                      To me it's worth it. CF supers are, in my opinion, retarded. A turbine is not meant to be linearly driven, it's meant to be exponentially driven.

                      Oh and also, for the Eurosport, all you need to hit 400whp is minor head work (which I already have), a schrick exhaust cam, a pulley and a tune. Oh and tuning is WAY easier on a TS because no matter what RPM you're at, the engine displaces the same amount of air each revolution, so the tuning is no different software wise than N/A tuning.
                      1987 BMW 325is | Frankenmotor S50 | Supersprint Replica Headers | K&N Intake | Gutted Stock Midpipe | Zimmermann Rotors | Stainless Brake Lines | Porterfield Racing Pads

                      Comment

                      • madjurgen
                        E30 Fanatic
                        • May 2005
                        • 1203

                        #26
                        Originally posted by e30polak
                        After driving a 500whp RMS supercharged e36 a couple weeks ago, I decided to ditch the turbo idea. Hopefully I will have a stage 2 kit on my car by this summer.
                        You seemed pretty set on going turbo. Can you elaborate on your experience and why youve changed your mind?

                        As time went on, the factory developed the car each year, making it faster, more comfortable, and capable of handling at higher speeds.
                        You don’t want this. You want the trickiest, most dangerous, oldest model you can find. Only then can you prove to the world that you’re a man.

                        Comment

                        • matt
                          No R3VLimiter
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 3731

                          #27
                          Originally posted by triggrhaapi
                          Oh and tuning is WAY easier on a TS because no matter what RPM you're at, the engine displaces the same amount of air each revolution, so the tuning is no different software wise than N/A tuning.


                          That's absolutely not true.

                          Comment

                          • triggrhaapi
                            Grease Monkey
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 350

                            #28
                            It IS true with a twin screw, it is NOT true with a centrifugal. Well, at least if it's directly driven. If you use a viscous transmission, then it's PSI based and the super doesn't make the same number of revolutions per engine revolution at any given RPM.

                            However, a twin screw WILL displace a specific amount of air per S/C rev. That's why their size is measured in liters.
                            Last edited by triggrhaapi; 02-23-2010, 11:49 AM.
                            1987 BMW 325is | Frankenmotor S50 | Supersprint Replica Headers | K&N Intake | Gutted Stock Midpipe | Zimmermann Rotors | Stainless Brake Lines | Porterfield Racing Pads

                            Comment

                            • e30polak
                              R3V OG
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 6136

                              #29
                              Originally posted by madjurgen
                              You seemed pretty set on going turbo. Can you elaborate on your experience and why youve changed your mind?
                              I drove a few more turbo e30s, and realized that I didn't like the way the car controlled the power as well. For my power goals, and the way that I use my car, I don't feel it's the right fit. I do canyon runs a lot, and I plan to track the car soon. Therefore I don't want the car to be overly difficult to control in those situations.

                              I also didn't like the laggy-ness of the higher powered turbo set-ups. I realize that spool time and power on set can all be controlled with the proper set-up and a good tune, but that will be way more money then I'm willing to spend.

                              I 've driven a couple of SC e36 m3s, and I love how smooth the powerband is, and how comparable it is to an NA engine. Also a Blower set-up will add less weight to the front of the car then a turbo set-up will.

                              Finally, used blower set-ups go for $1500-$3000 all day long on BFC, and will be much more reliable then a turbo set-up for the same price. I'm only looking to make around 350whp, so a blower is the best option for me.
                              Check out Undr8d Empire on Facebook: www.facebook.com/Undr8dEmpireLlc

                              INSTAGRAM: @UNDR8D_EMPIRE

                              Scarlet V2 - #Project333Ti by @castromotorsport, @kingsautobodyshop, @bimmerheads, @hardmotorsport, @excel_motorsports & @mateomotorsports - http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=371356

                              Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                              Comment

                              • jrdeamicis
                                E30 Modder
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 956

                                #30
                                Originally posted by e30polak
                                I drove a few more turbo e30s, and realized that I didn't like the way the car controlled the power as well. For my power goals, and the way that I use my car, I don't feel it's the right fit. I do canyon runs a lot, and I plan to track the car soon. Therefore I don't want the car to be overly difficult to control in those situations.

                                I also didn't like the laggy-ness of the higher powered turbo set-ups. I realize that spool time and power on set can all be controlled with the proper set-up and a good tune, but that will be way more money then I'm willing to spend.

                                I 've driven a couple of SC e36 m3s, and I love how smooth the powerband is, and how comparable it is to an NA engine. Also a Blower set-up will add less weight to the front of the car then a turbo set-up will.

                                Finally, used blower set-ups go for $1500-$3000 all day long on BFC, and will be much more reliable then a turbo set-up for the same price. I'm only looking to make around 350whp, so a blower is the best option for me.

                                Im in your boat.

                                The high HP turbo E30s are just down right scary. Giant fucking smile scary.


                                I think 350whp would be perfect for an E30.
                                Past Car : E30 S50 6 Speed 5 Lug 3.73
                                Current : Z3 S50 OBD2 (Smog Legal) 6 Speed BBS RN Dual Ear Diff
                                ___________________________________________
                                BNB Designs
                                Engine Swaps, Fabrication, Innovation, General Repair
                                Richmond CA
                                Julian 848-248-8029

                                Comment

                                Working...