Wiring Harness
So the Hall sender conversion is done. I installed the completed circuit in my M50 with a Hall sensor and verified that it works today. It is completely transparent to me and I forgot that I had on the drive home until some hot chics asked me at a stoplight "is that a Hall sensor in your M50" and I sheepishly replied "yes. yes it is." I know this part of the conversion will work.
On to the wiring harness.
I have the stock M54 harness and an e34 harness. I will need to use some of each and will end up with a mash-up harness. From the M54, since I'm using the M54 manifold, I will need to use the fuel injector and coil harness. The coil harness is already completely seperate and the fuel injector harness I will need to cut off. I hope the wire colors are the same! I will remove and completely replace the e34 version of those. All the sensors look the same as the M50 so the rest of the e34 harness is fine.
Gone will be the M54 DISA connection, fly-by-wire throttle body and quad Oxy sensors.
I have a red label 413 that I'll put an M3 chip in (thanks Doug!)
I will also remove the e34 tranny plug. Shame on you that have kept it, I plan on never having a transvestite in my car (that I know of). Anyone know what the two extra plugs by the ECU connection are? I've got 3 relays and 2 unidentified auxilliary-type plugs. An ID would be appreciated (lower-left portion of photo, one is black and one is white).
In fact, I would appreciate any notes on sensor connection wire colors to save me some hours of ETK madness.
On deck: install fuel pressure regulator.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
M54. Let the foolishness begin.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by hoveringuy View PostI'm not sure how the ECU decodes the VR signal, but I'm thinking it looks for the zero crossing is it goes positive again to start the next revolution, in which case it's good.
Leave a comment:
-
Charge pump success?
Things are looking up for using the Hall sensor and doing some signal conditioning to make it look like a VR signal. I got the charge pump working and made it change the original Hall signal into a full-blown +12v to -12v signal.
I've got a VR sensor on channel 1 here and a Hall senor on channel 2. The sensors are exactly 3 teeth apart, with the VR sensor lagging the Hall sensor.
This capture was at about 100 rpm, you can see the phase of the two signals are pretty close as is the voltage. The missing tooth crosses the Hall and then the VR sensors, the waveforms look a little different here. The Hall sensor reads the missing tooth literally and the VR sensor has a zero crossing half way through.
I'm not sure how the ECU decodes the VR signal, but I'm thinking it looks for the zero crossing is it goes positive again to start the next revolution, in which case it's good.
Next step is to solder up the package and install the Hall sensor in my running M50. It's exactly 2 chips, 2 capacitors and a potentiometer. That's it!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bender View Postthe depth of teeth on the inside crank gear is definetly smaller. not sure if that would effect how the VR works. But my vote would be to hack up the stock bosch VR sensor to make it fit and seal inside the block.
I haven't whipped out the charge pump yet but my next tactic will be to turn the half-wave Hall signal into a full-wave signal. It's the zero crossing point that the ECU is looking for.
I could also tap the rear hole for a 3/4 threaded VR and I'm sure that would work, too! Larger diameter=more sensitivity.
Leave a comment:
-
the depth of teeth on the inside crank gear is definetly smaller. not sure if that would effect how the VR works. But my vote would be to hack up the stock bosch VR sensor to make it fit and seal inside the block.
Leave a comment:
-
lol, oscilloscope + bench grinder = shadetree
Still, awesome work though. Way to be resourceful!!
Leave a comment:
-
sensor lab
I got a bunch of stuff in the mail today so was finally able to fire up my sensor lab. It's based on the BMW factory tool, the standard signal wheel on a bench grinder setup.
I have the M54 Hall crank position sender , an M50 sender, an M20 one and a few aftermarket units. A mini history of BMW sensors!
My quick quick look at it shows that the Hall sender produces a solid 5V square wave signal at almost any wheel speed down to zero. That's the beauty of active electronics.
Comparing the aftermarket "aerospace" quality 3/8" sender to the M50 Bosch sender shows that the Bosch one clearly rocks. It produces at least 5 times the signal magnitude and generates a 10 v peak-to-peak signal all the way down to about 80 rpm on the wheel and that's with a generous air gap.
The 3/8" sender doesn't produce that kind of voltage until a few hundred rpm. It does make a nice, clean signal but a car will never start if it needs to be cranked to a few hundred rpm!
I honestly don't know what the threshold level is but it's not even close to the Bosch unless I got the air gap down to a few thousandths.
Next up... I have a charge pump waiting in the wings....
Leave a comment:
-
no front 60-2 wheel
Here's a picture of the front of the engine. My understanding is that the M52/S52 motors have Siemens ECU's with 60-2 toothed wheels in both the rear and front of the engines, they use Hall sensors in the rear but the front wheel is unused, kinda like the vestigal legs in snakes.
OBD1 conversions will just add the VR sensor to the bung in the front becuase the wheel is already there.
The M54 has evolved to comletely shed the front sensor wheel and the mounting bung for the VR sensor is now gone. The front timing cover was completely changed to accomodate the new cooling scheme and dual VANOS. All I have to work with is the crankshaft mounted sensor wheel in the rear.
I have plently of stuff in the mail and some projects brewing in my lab to overcome that. More to follow.
Also note that I can't even remove the A/C pulley. It's part of the main pulley/dampner.
As far as the Zionsville waterpump, it uses the same gasket as the M50 waterpump.
Leave a comment:
-
The aluminium is super nice and all, but isn't there a groove for the other gasket missing? Are you going to just silicone/rtv it?
Leave a comment:
-
Can you post a picture of the damper on the front of the crank, and the back of the intake cam sprocket? I have a couple of ideas...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hoveringuy View PostThere's a lot of things on the M54 that I see as needlessly complicated for the sake of emissions. Here's something that's gotten an overhaul that I like.
The oil vapor management in the M50 just ported the vapors into intake manifold where it is supposed to get sucked up and burned. A lot of it does, but I think a good portion of the vapors end up condensing in the intake back to oil where it gums up your ICV and such.
In the M54 the oil vapors first go through this little cyclone spinner as they get sucked into the intake manifold. The device separates the liquid out and drains it back into the crankcase. The vapor travels through a small manifold where it is ported almost direcly to each of the intake valves.
This means that the e34 dipstick tube needs to have the oil return connection from the M54 dipstick tube grafted on to it. Otherwise the tube fits nicely. You can see the tube that connects there dangling down.
Another item done...
Leave a comment:
-
It's still a 60-2 wheel. I need to see if a VR sensor would fit in there and what the airgap would be. Plus, it needs to seal the crankcase. Another thing to consider is that Hall and VR sensors trigger on different parts of the teeth. One triggers in the middle and another on the edge, I think.
This is by no means a slam-dunk!Last edited by hoveringuy; 10-08-2008, 10:25 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
if it is indeed a 60-2 wheel, then i don't see why a vr sensor would not work. just need to find one that fits in place of the hall sensorLast edited by blueapplesoda; 10-08-2008, 09:33 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
duuuude... this is a getting to be a gritty little project!
I'm stoked for you! GL with the techno-details!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: