Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

M20 ITB's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • whodwho
    replied
    I was involved with a Dyno tuning session this weekend with a M30 with ITBs, started out SD and ended up Alpha-N. On SD you could get it running ok @ idle and WOT but rough thru the transition.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by clarkson View Post
    Local Aussie M20 nut is doing a roller rocker and cam combo, I reckon if he sold those in kit form I would buy that.

    My take on ITB's is this. I wanna do triple 45 dcoes. I know webers pretty well, and just seems easier to setup than standalone ITB injection.
    no way. all you need is a vac manifold to pull a signal off each TB. run speed density.. done. you can have the fuel map tuned in an afternoon.

    Originally posted by TobyB View Post
    Historically, VAC has had lash pad hardness issues.

    Lester Owen doesn't do M20, does he?

    I ran the Ireland 'Heavy Dooty' M10 rockers on the 2002 with notable success,
    given the reasonable cost.

    Wonder if KM Cams will do an M20 steel rocker?

    t
    the M20 IE HD rockers are good. there was a batch that had some flashing issues but it was more of a matter of cleaning them up rather than poor strength. Somebody had a set x-rayed and the casting quality was excellent.

    IMO everyone always freaks out about M20 rockers and says "billet!!!". But there really aren't any that are worth the price they cost. the HDs are only $300 and probably work as well and maybe even better (given how many have adjuster or pad issues). heck even a brand new set of stock/OEM rockers will take a lot of punishment. select proper valve springs and keep them adjusted. No issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarkson
    replied
    Local Aussie M20 nut is doing a roller rocker and cam combo, I reckon if he sold those in kit form I would buy that.

    My take on ITB's is this. I wanna do triple 45 dcoes. I know webers pretty well, and just seems easier to setup than standalone ITB injection.

    Leave a comment:


  • TobyB
    replied
    Historically, VAC has had lash pad hardness issues.

    Lester Owen doesn't do M20, does he?

    I ran the Ireland 'Heavy Dooty' M10 rockers on the 2002 with notable success,
    given the reasonable cost.

    Wonder if KM Cams will do an M20 steel rocker?

    t

    Leave a comment:


  • clarkson
    replied
    Yes stupid money:

    VAC - M20 Billet Rocker Arms, Set of 12
    Preorder Now!
    VAC-PRA-M20
    $1,799.95

    I wonder how many they have sold.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herr Faust Schinken
    replied
    Vacs i think stupid money

    Leave a comment:


  • clarkson
    replied
    wow those are nice looking rockers.

    Porsche Adjusters? What's the damage (price)?

    Leave a comment:


  • tinkwithanr
    replied
    Ha, fancy seeing you over here Toby.

    Broken Rockers you say?





    ;)

    Leave a comment:


  • TobyB
    replied
    Plenums are underrated...

    Me, I'd take the S54, thank you very much, and hit the track.

    And then not worry about breaking rockers ever again.

    t

    Leave a comment:


  • tinkwithanr
    replied
    Interesting thoughts. I know there have been a number of 'adjustable' length intake manifolds, though they tend to just be three or four different positions as opposed to the completely variable system on that bike.

    It would also be interesting to see the benefits, if any, the addition of a larger throttle plate upstream from the itb's.

    Leave a comment:


  • fporro
    replied
    I could best describe dbilas 44mm itb's response to throttle as the way a sail would behave.

    - If you were keeping certain amount of tension on rope as on partial throttle, then you cold feel the force of the wind increase and dreacrease as you manipulate it.
    it raises or lowers it, as rpm increases and decreases.

    - but, if wot is not reached gradually, then you'll feel resistance disapear and sail falls as on rpm drop or bog down feel.

    I think all of this has to to with air speed velocity, it must be manipulated and keep at peak or within peak range during various throttle positions.

    yzf r bikes have this fly by wire throttles with adjustable lenght trumpets




    As many have said, the plenum could be improved up on.

    There's not much talk about distance from valves to trottles, extruda and dbilas both make adaptors and yes, they both transition to match head port.,
    there's 40mm units in dbilas catalouge under 323i engines.

    I have a question or 3,

    - itb's have a tappable port, just in front of throttle plate, would this be a acceptable place for map readings?

    - if so, all 6 cylinders ? or just one reading., i'm thinking of tapping all 6 to take readings from dbilas plenum, a carbon airbox I bought and that crazy pvc pipe intake I made.,
    been thinking one huge trottle infront of airbox to manipulate overall intake pressure and itbs in conjuction with adjustable trumpets manipulating air speed. scweets.

    - could this readings be use to supplement ecu, someone posted that map's and itb's don't tune well together.

    and last but not least, does anyone has the dbilas chip ?











    Last edited by fporro; 10-14-2012, 07:04 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • e21jps
    replied
    ITB's on m20 are the goods, forget all the technical calculations and flows 40mm is about right, 45's can work but you need nice looong runners/trumpets but will always be a bit too big and have boggy midrange.

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by Buttbump View Post
    If you look at Extrudabody's site or give them a Call www.extrudabody.com they have 40mm @ 209cfm, 45mm @ 295cfm, and 48mm @ 345cfm ITB kits for the M20's???????????

    The Size of ITB's depends on what your head flow numbers call for........ Good rule of thumb is 1.5 times the Head Port Flow numbers....... IE: if your getting 200cfm thru each port Extrudabody's 45mm flow 295cfm (According to Kevin) which is about perfect for that combination, but if your head only flows 100cfm then their 40mm ITB's @ 209cfm are simply too BIG........ sizing ITB's has little to do with Engine Size, and all to do with Head Port Flow Numbers with your specific Cam Lift/Compression...........

    Now what OTHER causes can cause ITB's to be too big? Too Large of a CAM Lift or too Large Over Lap on the Cam....... As the Piston moves back up on the Compression stroke, the intake Valve is STILL OPEN, the RUSH of incoming air/fuel (IE: Velocity) is what's Holding the Intake Charge in the Cylinder, if the intake TRACT is too LARGE or CAM is too Large = Little to NO Velocity, and the Charge is pushed back up the Intake Tract in the form of REVERSION....

    ITB's are not CONDOM's................ One size does not fit all.... :)
    first work out the runner size you need (cross sectional area 'CSA').......do this by getting hold of pipemax and some other simulation programs e.g. Engine analyser pro, dynomation and see what varying the runner bore size does to inlet tract velocity then target recommended velocities at whatever rpm you are after which in turn will give you the CSA you need, then choose what throttles compliment this. Doing this makes sure that with the head and cam you have things will be pretty close to what they need to be.

    Excessive large runnners is shown to kill midrange according to the simulations which in reality is shown on the dbilas dyno plots with 45mm and larger throttles i have seen. Most people haven't the cam or exhaust setup to make the most of the bigger throttles so i wouldn't be sacrificing midrange for next to no topend, gain its best to err on the slightly small size IMO.
    Last edited by digger; 10-14-2011, 04:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buttbump
    replied
    If you look at Extrudabody's site or give them a Call www.extrudabody.com they have 40mm @ 209cfm, 45mm @ 295cfm, and 48mm @ 345cfm ITB kits for the M20's???????????

    The Size of ITB's depends on what your head flow numbers call for........ Good rule of thumb is 1.5 times the Head Port Flow numbers....... IE: if your getting 200cfm thru each port Extrudabody's 45mm flow 295cfm (According to Kevin) which is about perfect for that combination, but if your head only flows 100cfm then their 40mm ITB's @ 209cfm are simply too BIG........ sizing ITB's has little to do with Engine Size, and all to do with Head Port Flow Numbers with your specific Cam Lift/Compression...........

    Now what OTHER causes can cause ITB's to be too big? Too Large of a CAM Lift or too Large Over Lap on the Cam....... As the Piston moves back up on the Compression stroke, the intake Valve is STILL OPEN, the RUSH of incoming air/fuel (IE: Velocity) is what's Holding the Intake Charge in the Cylinder, if the intake TRACT is too LARGE or CAM is too Large = Little to NO Velocity, and the Charge is pushed back up the Intake Tract in the form of REVERSION....

    ITB's are not CONDOM's................ One size does not fit all.... :)

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by jules325i View Post
    So if i contact Dblias dynamics and there is a 40mm it could be made to work effeciently.
    they will be able to tell you but will recommend the 45mm


    this says there is

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X