12v Timing Chain: If you had the Option would you?
Collapse
X
-
woa..
I have to say, I'm quite surprized. All i've ever heard from this forum (R3V) is bitching about the tbelt.
whining about issues, valve slap on failers, people swaping motors to get away from the issue.
sure I would love to have a tbelt built like the drive belt on my Harley.
For the last year I've been working on this issue thinking everybody may want to convert to chain.
oh well from what i read i was way off base....
I crack the "Nut".......https://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar...re-irs.356333/
This Forum is built on love, and powered by Sexual Tension!
When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.Comment
-
Like others said if, if it's replaced when it needs to be replaced there's no problem! I looked into a timing chain conversion for my m20 but it wasn't worth it. I just see the timing belt as regular maintenance now...-AlexComment
-
Comment
-
If you think a timing chain is a maintenance free part then you clearly have never owned an M42. lolComment
-
So true, that's why I voted 'Go F yourself'. I would rather change that belt every year than have to worry about sealing a goddamn timing case. I have done numerous t-belt joibs on my 1g/2g DSM's. After those whores, any other belt has to be a cinch.
All things being equal, a belt is also lighter, cheaper, and cleaner. The chain weighs a ton compared the the belt. The belt and tensioner costs what, like $60 maybe, and cam sprockets/gears don't have to be replaced due to wear, nor does one have to spend the loot on a set of timing case gaskets. Plus no oil is involved, or silicone for case gaskets.-03/2005 E46 330D Touring 6spd(204hp/410nM) Sapphire Black/Naturbraun Sport...300k KM & 35mpg(mixed)Comment
-
you are right they still use some belts today. I think the base civic engine is still a belt. but most hondas are chains again.
Honda was the big rebel against the trend but the consumers dont like it.
hyundai kia is the other company. still some belts but mostly chains now.
daewoo was belts, and also some gm cars like the pontiac roadster. but like, all toyotas nissans bmws etc are chains now.
Comment
-
My experience so far with timing chain-equipped cars is that the timing chain system is not necessarily trouble free. Sprockets wear out, tensioners wear out, chains stretch, etc. It's not all it's cracked up to be. And all of those parts cost more than a timing belt and its tensioner.The current fleet:
1992 325ic: 148k-171k miles
1999 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 4WD, 114k-142k miles
1984 MasterCraft Stars and Stripes Powerslot (not a car :D) PCM Ford 351W, 904 hoursComment
-
possibly but which ones?
the majority of toyotas use chains like from corrolas to camrys to tundras.
It is possible the v6 in camrys is a belt.
definitely part of the chain movement.
some chains do last forever like on toyota trucks. Never a belt in toyota trucks. even lasting forever and never breaking a belt is better. less friction and less metal in the oil.
better gas mileage from a belt.
Comment
-
Last edited by stamar; 03-18-2012, 03:42 PM.
Comment
-
Belts are more efficient, far cheaper, and if mainained, plenty reliable.
/thread ;)Comment


Comment