oil?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dnguyen1963
    R3VLimited
    • Nov 2011
    • 2648

    #16
    Originally posted by idanity
    its nonsense b/c newer cats are cheaper and crappier...and teh U.S. govt made a law or something to force the warranty that all NEW cats are garunteed to last 120k or something...don't quote me on specifics, but thats what i read...somewhere, sometime..maybe in the deep web...the car manufactures and oil companies just came together to help each other out...and possibly the new metals in engines don't need zinc...i didn't read that last part, but its plausible.

    Do you understand anything when I said zinc complexing with palladium/rhodium?

    Comment

    • nando
      Moderator
      • Nov 2003
      • 34827

      #17
      as far as I know there has never been any real evidence that ZDDP damaged cats (at least not in the concentrations that older high zinc oils had). it's was "suspected", not proven.

      if you're burning so much oil as to coat the cats enough to damage them your emissions are probably fucked anyway. right?
      Build thread

      Bimmerlabs

      Comment

      • dnguyen1963
        R3VLimited
        • Nov 2011
        • 2648

        #18
        Originally posted by nando
        as far as I know there has never been any real evidence that ZDDP damaged cats (at least not in the concentrations that older high zinc oils had). it's was "suspected", not proven.

        if you're burning so much oil as to coat the cats enough to damage them your emissions are probably fucked anyway. right?
        The tests are quite simple. Elemental analysis for zinc and oxidation test for palladium.

        Comment

        • nando
          Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 34827

          #19
          but in what concentration? in a lab setting?

          where's the real world evidence? my original M20 cat had 220,000 miles on it and was perfectly functional. The M20 had high ZDDP oil in it that entire time.

          Mobil ran their test M20B25 to 1,000,000 miles with a high zinc oil. Yeah, it was a "lab", but surely if ZDDP = death to cats they'd have to replace it a couple times in 1,000,000 dyno miles?
          Build thread

          Bimmerlabs

          Comment

          • dnguyen1963
            R3VLimited
            • Nov 2011
            • 2648

            #20
            Originally posted by nando
            but in what concentration? in a lab setting?

            where's the real world evidence? my original M20 cat had 220,000 miles on it and was perfectly functional. The M20 had high ZDDP oil in it that entire time.

            Mobil ran their test M20B25 to 1,000,000 miles with a high zinc oil. Yeah, it was a "lab", but surely if ZDDP = death to cats they'd have to replace it a couple times in 1,000,000 dyno miles?
            Like I said, perfectly tuned cars will not experience this problem and I am sure your car and the one that Mobil tested are in excellent condition. The ones that are not well maintained and burning oil with high ZPPD (i.e. those that cannot pass CA emission) will most likely accelerate the death of their cat. As for real world evidence, this is similar to the battle for global warming...it depends on who you ask. My answer is based solely on the chemistry between zinc and precious metals in the cat. I have done many syntheses with palladium, and trust me, it does not take much to poison the palladium and render it ineffective.

            Comment

            • TobyB
              R3V Elite
              • Oct 2011
              • 5163

              #21
              If your car is burning oil with high level of ZPPD then your cat will be destroyed in no time
              THAT is nonsense. 'Complexing' is also not a chemical nor metallic term.

              ZDDP DOES eventually chemically bond to the elements in NEW, MODERN 3 way cats and
              render them less effective. And it's a warranty issue- since oil's changed every 20k now
              engines DO wear more before the emission warranty's up, and there were statistical
              problems running high ZDDP levels in modern motors...

              THAT DON'T NEED IT!!!

              Here's the thing, and here's where you're RIGHT- if you have a roller camshaft, ZDDP
              is not needed. It's really only there for sliding friction reduction on the cams of
              older motors.

              So if you have an E30, run Mobil1 15-50, Brad Penn, or something else without a starburst
              on it.
              Your cat will last 50,000 miles or more, as designed, and may actually have 9 lives
              and hack up a hairball...

              If you have a more modern car that's been designed for low ZDDP oils, by all means run
              them. Hell, even my 89 mitsu has roller rockers. The M20's ancient.

              And needs ancient oil...

              t
              now, sometimes I just mess with people. It's more entertaining that way. george graves

              Comment

              • Komzorz
                Grease Monkey
                • Jun 2011
                • 332

                #22
                I can tell you what oil I wouldn't recommend - Castrol Edge 5w-50.

                It's a great oil, but leaks like a sieve out of my 80k mile m20. I'm guessing it's just too slick for our simpler needs. Will be switching to Brad Penn.
                '87 325is - Schwarz/Schwarz

                Comment

                • stamar
                  E30 Fanatic
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 1362

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Komzorz
                  I can tell you what oil I wouldn't recommend - Castrol Edge 5w-50.

                  It's a great oil, but leaks like a sieve out of my 80k mile m20. I'm guessing it's just too slick for our simpler needs. Will be switching to Brad Penn.

                  I have no leaks with napa brand synthetic 5-50 which is made by valvoline

                  but I have noo data on the zinc content.

                  Comment

                  • dnguyen1963
                    R3VLimited
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 2648

                    #24
                    [quote=TobyB;3316793]THAT is nonsense. 'Complexing' is also not a chemical nor metallic term.

                    Go back and read your Chem 101 text book if you do not understand the term "complexing".

                    Comment

                    Working...