m20 adjustable cam gear

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SkiFree
    replied
    Originally posted by TobyB

    I just slot the bolt holes on the 2002 gears, and pull the pin out. That works just fine.

    t
    Sooooo ... guess what just went NLA Toby.

    Leave a comment:


  • TobyB
    replied
    it was something they nipped in the butt pretty quick.
    Not that there's anything wrong with that...

    hee

    I'm slightly surprised no- one's offering one with the old hot- rodder trick of cutting different keyways into the
    stock gear to give +2, -2, +4, -4, etc.

    I just slot the bolt holes on the 2002 gears, and pull the pin out. That works just fine.

    t

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by SkiFree
    ^ Nando, you've got it backwards (as I'm guessing you were guessing).

    Yes, but it was something they nipped in the butt pretty quick.
    out of curiosity when are we talking? they have been around for ages

    Leave a comment:


  • whodwho
    replied
    Perfect, thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • SkiFree
    replied
    Originally posted by whodwho
    Same as a rubber crank seal wears a groove into the crank



    Bummer, I guess not quick enough for me 8^(

    So they originally designed it up from an ebay one and not an OEM?!?! 8^)
    Email me when you can Keith. The guy who heads up NukeNA is a pretty understanding.

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by whodwho
    Was there an issue with the Nuke ones at one time?

    The belt fits that way on my Nuke one as well, I was surprised at the fit. I didn't know if it fit that way on a new OEM one and wears in over time.

    I took some pic of all three as well a while back, I will see if I can find them.
    i have a new Nuke and OEM here in front of me, the contibelt wraps around the OEM slighty better than it does on the Nuke which needs a little bit of tension to get it to fully mate.

    The blue gates fits OEM well but on the Nuke it would need even more tension than the conti to fully mate but not near as bad as the IE bottom pic.

    if you compare teeth they are slighty different shape (depth) on the Nuke vs OEM gear. in a way it makes sense for the belt to fit best under a bit of tension as that's how it operates.

    ive been using a nuke for 8 years and done a few belt swaps without issues and will be using another for new engine. the biggest hassle was having to pull the hex bolts for the cam seal carrier (one at a time) and countersink the carrier to fit countersunk screws but dont know if this is still the case.
    Last edited by digger; 01-05-2016, 04:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • whodwho
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    I don't see how a rubber belt could wear a steel gear.
    Same as a rubber crank seal wears a groove into the crank

    Originally posted by SkiFree
    Yes, but it was something they nipped in the butt pretty quick.
    Bummer, I guess not quick enough for me 8^(

    So they originally designed it up from an ebay one and not an OEM?!?! 8^)

    Leave a comment:


  • SkiFree
    replied
    ^ Nando, you've got it backwards (as I'm guessing you were guessing).

    Originally posted by whodwho
    Was there an issue with the Nuke ones at one time?
    Yes, but it was something they nipped in the butt pretty quick.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    I don't see how a rubber belt could wear a steel gear.

    Leave a comment:


  • whodwho
    replied
    Originally posted by SkiFree
    I used to sell the ebay pulley and while they would work in a pinch the teeth were just far enough off that it would stretch the belt abnormally (I did see a couple cases of rapid timing belt wear associated with this issue).

    Took these pictures to illustrate the problem ....


    No, there is no "cheaper" alternative that is worth anything at this point. The guys at VAC do one, but they just machine out an existing gear and put their own innards in it (and the pricing is a hair bit more).
    Was there an issue with the Nuke ones at one time?

    The belt fits that way on my Nuke one as well, I was surprised at the fit. I didn't know if it fit that way on a new OEM one and wears in over time.

    I took some pic of all three as well a while back, I will see if I can find them.

    Leave a comment:


  • MR 325
    replied
    Originally posted by Kershaw
    I doubt you're going to find cheaper than ebay Chinese made, but for quality...

    http://www.bimmerheads.com/catalog/m...camshaft-gear/

    Leave a comment:


  • abit
    replied
    ok, thanks for participating in the debate, I ordered nuke gear :)

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    yeah, that ebay gear isn't bad quality but the belt teeth aren't quite right. it makes installing the belt a giant pain in the ass.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkiFree
    replied
    I used to sell the ebay pulley and while they would work in a pinch the teeth were just far enough off that it would stretch the belt abnormally (I did see a couple cases of rapid timing belt wear associated with this issue).

    Took these pictures to illustrate the problem ....


    No, there is no "cheaper" alternative that is worth anything at this point. The guys at VAC do one, but they just machine out an existing gear and put their own innards in it (and the pricing is a hair bit more).

    Leave a comment:


  • abit
    replied
    that nuke product is what I mean about PPF pulley, I want something like that, but bit cheaper, Chinese pulley is not my goal at all.

    Leave a comment:

Working...