Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

low dyno numbers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    if it was a mustang dyno, they naturally read lower than dynojets
    Michael Spiegle

    '01 Ford Escape / Daily Driver
    '99 M3 / Track Car
    '87 325is bronzit / wtf car
    '06 Daytona Triumph 675 / Daily Rider

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Digitalwave
      With a 200k M20 and a chip I would wager you are still making less than stock factory HP, although 108whp is a joke. And 153whp for a 7psi turbo is very low too, I have seen stock M20s make that but just like Chris said the numbers mean nothing and can't really be compared.
      224 wtq isn't anything to sneeze at though..
      Build thread

      Bimmerlabs

      Comment


        #18
        224 wtq isn't anything to sneeze at though..

        He was using a small turbo that spooled up by about 2500 rpm, so it made huge torque down low, but ran out of breath about 5000-5500 rpm. Since then he switched to a larger one, but hasn't dyno'd it yet.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by nando
          Originally posted by Digitalwave
          With a 200k M20 and a chip I would wager you are still making less than stock factory HP, although 108whp is a joke. And 153whp for a 7psi turbo is very low too, I have seen stock M20s make that but just like Chris said the numbers mean nothing and can't really be compared.
          224 wtq isn't anything to sneeze at though..
          Oops, I didn't notice that part.

          RISING EDGE

          Let's drive fast and have fun.

          Comment

          Working...
          X