front drop on H&R sports WAY too low

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • taiden
    Advanced Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 178

    #1

    front drop on H&R sports WAY too low

    I put some 29664 H&R sports on my 85 318i.

    I ended up with a 2.25" drop in the front, and a 1.25" drop in the rear.

    From my brief research, it should be a 1.25" drop in the front.

    Any idea as to where my 1" of ride height went?

    My spring pads are still there. The only other thing is my front sway bar is disconnected at the moment, but I don't think this would account for 1" of ride height.

    www.h-r.com/bin/29664.pdf << spring spec sheet
  • Exodus_2pt0
    R3V Elite
    • Dec 2011
    • 5943

    #2
    What was you're ride height before/after?

    That would give you a good idea if it is just defective springs or something else.
    No E30 Club
    Originally posted by MrBurgundy
    Anyways, mustangs are gay and mini vans are faster than your car, you just have to deal with that.

    Comment

    • LJ851
      R3V OG
      • Nov 2010
      • 7918

      #3
      Doesn't make sense, are the springs new?
      Lorin


      Originally posted by slammin.e28
      The M30 is God's engine.

      Comment

      • taiden
        Advanced Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 178

        #4
        The springs are not new, but I have never in my life seen a car sag 1.0" over time.

        Not sure what you are getting at with before/after measurements and it having to do with defective springs. The drops I listed were found by taking the difference between stock ride height and dropped ride height.

        It's incredible how much more the front is dropped. I have all my spring pads installed.

        Comment

        • taiden
          Advanced Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 178

          #5
          Also the free length is exactly what free length is on the spec sheet. I measured everything during install.

          Comment

          • CW325
            E30 Fanatic
            • Jul 2011
            • 1434

            #6
            Maybe your car just sat higher than usual on the stock springs..? Post pictures of how they look now

            Comment

            • taiden
              Advanced Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 178

              #7
              That's certainly possible.

              Sorry it's too dark for pictures. But from center of the wheel (where the rondel center is), following a vertical line to the fender, here is my ride height in inches.

              front: 13.0"
              rear: 13.5

              Early wheel arches

              Left and right heights are within 0.5" of each other, but the numbers above are averages. The variance in left to right heights are identical to the variance in heights on stock springs.

              Comment

              • Exodus_2pt0
                R3V Elite
                • Dec 2011
                • 5943

                #8
                If you measured the ride height before, and after, you would know exactly how much the springs dropped your car.

                Comparing specs doesn't say much on a 20+ year old vehicle.
                No E30 Club
                Originally posted by MrBurgundy
                Anyways, mustangs are gay and mini vans are faster than your car, you just have to deal with that.

                Comment

                • taiden
                  Advanced Member
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 178

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Exodus_2pt0
                  If you measured the ride height before, and after, you would know exactly how much the springs dropped your car.
                  This is what I did.

                  Comment

                  • CW325
                    E30 Fanatic
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 1434

                    #10
                    Assuming your on stock wheels, how much gap Is there between the tires and fender?

                    Comment

                    • taiden
                      Advanced Member
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 178

                      #11
                      Alright here is my measurement sheet.




                      Code:
                                              front      rear
                      ride height stock       15.25"     14.5"
                                  H&R         13.00"     13.5"
                                  difference  2.25"      1.0"
                      
                      
                      free length stock       14.25"     9.5"
                                  H&R         10.75"     8.0"

                      Comment

                      • taiden
                        Advanced Member
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 178

                        #12
                        Originally posted by CW325
                        Assuming your on stock wheels, how much gap Is there between the tires and fender?
                        Hard to say because it's so far tucked that from the outside edge of the tire to the fender is almost 45° from vertical, but my measurements should give you an idea. Measurements were taken from the center of the wheel, straight vertical to the fender.

                        Comment

                        • mlytle64
                          Advanced Member
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 141

                          #13
                          87 325 before H&R sports


                          same car after H&R sports. drop was almost exactly as advertisted, about 1 in.
                          marshall
                          75 M2
                          87 325
                          97 m3
                          02 325it

                          Comment

                          • taiden
                            Advanced Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 178

                            #14
                            That's what I was hoping for, but were they the 29664?

                            Comment

                            • taiden
                              Advanced Member
                              • Oct 2009
                              • 178

                              #15
                              I hate posting these pictures because they are misleading. The front looks much lower in person.



                              Comment

                              Working...