The OFFICIAL 2013 Formula 1 thread!
Collapse
X
-
If they changed it to 1/10 of liter, the teams would just put 9/10 of a liter less in the car.
Almost every car is underfueled to start with the expectation at some point in the race the car will run a "conservation stint".
The race started wet (which uses less fuel) and the cars were still conserving at the end.Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries
www.gutenparts.com
One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!
Comment
-
Need parts now? Need them cheap? steve@blunttech.com
Chief Sales Officer, Midwest Division—Blunt Tech Industries
www.gutenparts.com
One stop shopping for NEW, USED and EURO PARTS!
Comment
-
A pretty exciting race but Vettel has done some reputational damage. Also, why Alonso didn't pit on L1 is beyond comprehension.
FTW
-RBR
-Mercedes
-Vettel
Fail
-Force India
-Alonso
-VettelCurrent: Brilliantrot '91 318is M20B25
Former: '88 M3 3.2L, '91 318is 2.0L, '90 318i, '85 325e 2.8L, '84 318i 2.0L, '84 318i, '90 325is
wamchenry@gmail.com
insta: @simple_machinesComment
-
Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.
If you have bought items from me, please leave feedback below.
If you are a BUYER, Check My Feedback.:up:
http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=183860
Check out my Euro Build Thread
http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=215557Comment
-
Heh, I figured that was the next argument. Yes, teams could simply just run with more fuel on board, much in the same way that the FIA could reduce the size of their fuel sample. Anyways, I don't see the answer to this dilemma being found in this thread, so hopefully it won't continue to be a problem like it has been the last few seasons.If they changed it to 1/10 of liter, the teams would just put 9/10 of a liter less in the car.
Almost every car is underfueled to start with the expectation at some point in the race the car will run a "conservation stint".
The race started wet (which uses less fuel) and the cars were still conserving at the end.
And the picture (above) is hilarious, I like Vettel and I still don't place him completely in the wrong, but I see him going through PR hell this season for that stunt.- Trey
E90 325i/6 (ZSP, ZPP, ZCW)
E36 325i sedan
E30 325i sedan
Volvo 945TComment
-
The fuel situation is pretty straight-forward:
A race car requires a certain Quantity (Q) of fuel to cover the race distance and that amount falls somewhere between:
Qmin = Optimal consumption rate X distance - 1L
Qmax = Optimal performance rate X distance - 1L
From there it is up to the strategists to determine what is the proper tradeoff between fuel load and performance; nobody wants a heavy car in a sport where a few lbs = a tenth or whatever the math is at that particular circuit. When the race pace is faster than the model they decide on, then you can end up short of fuel.
Bottom line: Sometimes you get it wrong!
And the FIA requirement is an arbitrary fixed number that is the same for all teams, so it makes no difference if it's a little more or less than a liter as it's an absolute value.Current: Brilliantrot '91 318is M20B25
Former: '88 M3 3.2L, '91 318is 2.0L, '90 318i, '85 325e 2.8L, '84 318i 2.0L, '84 318i, '90 325is
wamchenry@gmail.com
insta: @simple_machinesComment
-
This time a million. The FIA's regs (aside from the actual test) has nothing to do with how much fuel the cars have left over. That's 100% on the engineers. Could they change the rules/design requirements to eliminate the cars running out of fuel? Theoretically, yes. Probably not happening, though.The fuel situation is pretty straight-forward:
A race car requires a certain Quantity (Q) of fuel to cover the race distance and that amount falls somewhere between:
Qmin = Optimal consumption rate X distance - 1L
Qmax = Optimal performance rate X distance - 1L
From there it is up to the strategists to determine what is the proper tradeoff between fuel load and performance; nobody wants a heavy car in a sport where a few lbs = a tenth or whatever the math is at that particular circuit. When the race pace is faster than the model they decide on, then you can end up short of fuel.
Bottom line: Sometimes you get it wrong!
And the FIA requirement is an arbitrary fixed number that is the same for all teams, so it makes no difference if it's a little more or less than a liter as it's an absolute value.1991 318i SOLD
2003 325i SOLD
Racecars and stuff.Comment
-
Teams will always error on the side of to little fuel as the start of the race is so crucial. One pass or lack of a pass at the start can make or ruin your race. As the race goes on the field gets more strung out so the conseving fuel isn't usually a big issue but yeah that's a downside to no in race refuelling. I really do rue the artificially slow pace of the current formula.
One day hopefully their will be a series of balls out fast as hell engineering to the max racing in open wheel form. No restrictions other than displacement. Wouldn't that be cool to see.Comment
-
I honestly like that Vettel was driven enough to disobey team order and push for the win as a driver should do.
F1 is interesting due to its team nature, but it is still driver vs driver, and should be fought to the line. Team orders? Screw em if you can take the position, just be aware of the political fallout.
Comment
-
this is from 2012, but i found it relevant to this topic. im not an avid watcher of formula 1, but i do enjoy watching it when its on. so seeing this for the first time, i was impressed, very.
Comment
-
Exactly. If you ask me, the secondary driver on the team (WEBBER) is there to ensure that the primary driver (VETTEL) wins races. People may come to races to watch RBR. People may come to watch Webber. But for the most part, the major fans of RBR are coming to watch Vettel WIN. Not to watch him hang back behind the secondary driver while he limps his car into a checkered flag in P1. If you honestly believe this is how racing should be, we have vastly different opinions of what racing is.I honestly like that Vettel was driven enough to disobey team order and push for the win as a driver should do.
F1 is interesting due to its team nature, but it is still driver vs driver, and should be fought to the line. Team orders? Screw em if you can take the position, just be aware of the political fallout.
Please pop a cork in that crap. I hate this social convention that when someone likes something that other people don't, they're a "fanboy". If that's the case, then to all of the homosexuals in the world, I'm a vagina fanboy.
Regardless, this too, shall pass. This is nothing more than this week's F1 drama, and next race, someone else will do something foolish that half the fans will get all sandy-in-the-vag over, while the other half defends it with their lives.
:hitler:Comment

Comment