I know there was M4 discussions but

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tg318is
    replied
    I dig the front... and then the rest of it is a little too 'soft'. idk.

    Leave a comment:


  • rturbo 930
    replied
    I still think they need to fire Bangle. BMWs cars still look like shit compared to the German's other offerings IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • lolcantturn
    replied
    Wow that looks humongous

    Leave a comment:


  • lambo
    replied
    ^ If you're being serious... The E30 M3 definitely wasn't supposed to be "bland". I mean, look at the box flares and big wing haha! Now, the E28 M5, that was definitely a sleeper.

    Leave a comment:


  • ELVA164
    replied
    Doesn't the blandness fit the true spirit of the M cars though? It's a true sleeper; looks like bloated horrible crap, but goes really fast and stuff! So it's worth it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Roysneon
    replied
    I'll never afford one, IDGAF.

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    replied
    It's kinda like BMW is going the way Chevrolet went in the 80's and 90's to big and bland

    Leave a comment:


  • Vtec?lol
    replied
    I can't get over the fact that it's called a fucking four.
    Totally kills it.

    Leave a comment:


  • rThor432
    replied
    I just can't get interested. I don't care that it's got more turbos than it's competitors and carbon-ceramic brakes. Still a heavy sled..

    Leave a comment:


  • M-technik-3
    started a topic I know there was M4 discussions but

    I know there was M4 discussions but

    still thinking it's bland and blah. Everyone is basically making the same car these days.



    Looks like any other new three series.
Working...